Rasputin ... Putin ...
Interesting.
Whatever - sounds like after-the-fact backbiting by a former administration official against a rival. Kushner is not going to stop being Trump’s son-in-law (as far as we know), and that won’t stop me from voting for Trump again.
I’m inclined to believe Peter Navarro.
There are some of us here that will believe every word of this...I do.
I never believed those here that claimed there was no infighting between Bannon and Kushner. Of course there was...and Kushner won. To the detriment of Trump
Those tongue in cheek comments by the author may be why the DOJ would go after Kushner to get him to be the mole. Kushner will sell out everyone to keep from going to prison like his father (maybe not his wife..but who knows..look at what his father did)
Not a fan of Jared, he was in was over his head.
Any one who said that should be bitch-slapped and fired.
WOW...no idea he was so evil.
bump
For a moment let’s assume that Hillary won in 2016, and she put Chelsea’s husband in a senior position. Not even knowing much about the guy, most folks here would suggest that that’s a bad idea. Nepotism of any sort is usually a bad idea.
Same goes with this Trump-Kushner situation. Just another example of Trump’s poor appointment choices. Please learn from this the second time around, Donald.
Have to admit I was a big Kushner defender here on FR.
I. Was. Wrong.
Peter Navarro is one of the few truly brilliant loyalists to Trump. Always, always had his back and supported MAGA 100%.
I’d take one Navarro over a room full of Kushners, Boltons, Pences...
It seems odd to me that with Peter under indictment, he takes this opportunity to call out the son-in-law. You are stuck with your in-laws — love ‘um, hate them, you are not going to get rid of them.
Why now?
Another view.
Navarro has his view, Bannon has his view.
A couple of things are indisputable. For one, everyone, including Bannon, admitted that without Kush’s financial genius, they wouldn’t have won. They needed his expertise.
Second, Bannon accused Kush of leaking, but I’m as sure as I can be that Bannon was leaking (or, also leaking). Look at “Devil’s Advocate” which makes this pretty clear.
Third, I just don’t see Kush as being that disloyal. Navarro is a true believer, but like Grenell can get off the rails sometimes, thinking they are speaking for Trump when they are not.