Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Noble Declaration of Independence
Article V Blog ^ | July 3rd 2020 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 07/04/2022 9:30:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie

Independence Day makes Progressives squirm. They despise the principles of the American Revolution. If they could, their scotus judges would gut the Declaration as thoroughly as they have the Constitution. To them, our Noble Declaration, this expression of God-given reason subverts social justice; they are right.

Since the Declaration is indeed hostile to their moral relativism, the Left has long attempted to minimize our founding to a fuzzy faith in the people. The “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and “all men are created equal,” translates in their Marxist minds as widespread democracy accompanied with equal stuff to all. It is in the democratic atmosphere alone in which their demagogues can incite the people into various factions constantly at each other’s throats.

Despite their efforts they can’t twist the Declaration into a statement of majoritarianism. A few minutes in actual reading and contemplation puts their slogans to rest. In the Preamble the Founders dissolved political bands, the statutory power of Great Britain. However, left untouched were the moral bands which connect all men, which are derived from the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.

Consent of the governed is not a rule for democracy. Consent is the means to an end, the security of our unalienable rights. Majoritarian consent alone is insufficient to make political power just. If numbers alone made right, the American Revolution would be deprived of its moral justification. The moral order comes first. Only after they had set forth that order did the Founders turn to government. And there too they were clear: government is instituted to secure our rights—that is its purpose. And it gets its just powers from the consent of the governed.

Government is thus twice limited: by its end, to secure our rights; and by its means, which require our consent if they are to be legitimate. Absent moral justification, our revolution could be regarded as littler better than a Black Lives Matter riot. Modern resort to dangerous majoritarianism is heard when the media often describe a congressionally passed bill as having “bipartisan support.” That is majoritarian Left-speak for just and moral law. It just isn’t so.

Our Founders recognized their duty, as equals among mankind, to explain why separation from Great Britain was necessary. Only a decent and civil people would even bother. The Declaration isn’t a crude manifesto of political separation and power to the people.

Before resorting to force for correcting abuses of government, civilized men will appeal to reason and even sentiment. So imbued were the Founders with introspective reason, they asked if they weren’t making too much of their complaints against George III. The same reason convinced them that America was headed for despotism, and it was necessary to “throw off such government.” Being rational yet knowing that one should not sit alone in judgment of one’s actions, they not only submitted facts to a candid world, but asked God Himself, “the Supreme Judge of the World,” if they were right.

The Declaration of Independence wasn’t signed by the chairman of a peoples’ committee. No demagogue-in-waiting stood ready to assume authoritarian power. Individual men, through reliance on the protection of divine Providence, mutually pledged to each other their lives, fortunes, and sacred Honor. There is nothing more to pledge beyond one’s life, possessions, and especially honor. In an age when a man’s word carried more force than law, these men were so convinced in the righteousness and truth of their cause, they swore to never dishonor themselves and suffer the disdain of their peers.

This fourth of July, I suggest we all take some time beyond BBQ and fireworks. Engage your friends and in-laws in discussion of Our Noble Declaration of Independence.


TOPICS: Government; History
KEYWORDS: 4thofjuly; articlev; declaration; independenceday; july4th; theframers; therevolution

1 posted on 07/04/2022 9:30:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Excellent


2 posted on 07/04/2022 9:35:30 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
e “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and “all men are created equal,”

Grates on our Marxist Government like finger nails on a blackboard. They hate America like the devil hates holy water.

3 posted on 07/04/2022 9:35:30 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Strong words. Well-stated.


4 posted on 07/04/2022 9:37:38 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I suggest we also engage our friends and neighbors on why the founders put the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution and how ignoring it has resulted in the clown world we find ourselves in.

The purpose of the clause was to prevent foreigners from being CIC.

John Jay to George Washington:

“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

That means anyone born with more than ONE nationality is NOT a natural born citizen and is indeed a foreigner and was PRECISELY who the founders were excluding.

Obama should be an object lesson on how correct they were.


5 posted on 07/04/2022 9:42:27 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

NPR nixes traditional July 4th reading of Declaration of Independence in favor of exploring ‘equality’

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/07/04/npr-nixes-traditional-july-4th-reading-of-declaration-of-independence-in-favor-of-exploring-equality-1257794/

Sho’ nuff.


6 posted on 07/04/2022 9:43:11 AM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Our family used to go to the rodeo in St. Paul, OR every Fourth of July (it was my father’s birthday). I’ll always remember Dad reciting the Declaration of Independence from memory one year during the drive over.


7 posted on 07/04/2022 10:10:28 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin

Wow.


8 posted on 07/04/2022 11:07:33 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

Thanks!


9 posted on 07/04/2022 11:08:04 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson