An Article V convention can only propose Constitutional Amendments that must be ratified by the states in the usual manner. How is that a “Trojan horse?”
Why do you think the communists, who do not follow the constitution, will follow the Article V rules?
The problem I see with it as far as I’ve been able to determine over the years this Article V movement has been around is that once convened, there is NOTHING to stop the ensuing proceedings to change the original charter/purpose/goal. There is just not enough experience with it in our history, frankly.
The arguments I’ve gotten back range from “we wouldn’t do that” to “that can’t happen....” and so on. Of COURSE it can happen. There is NOTHING to stop the convention from being infested with leftists and progressives masquerading like they want to strengthen our founding. They’re already doing it with DAs all around the country, with Secretaries of States, with elections clerks and poll workers and WILLING collusion from Democrat judges.
In truth, Article V is a great idea. But it depends on honest and ethical peoples to execute - Just like our current Constitution needs. I’ve seen NONE of this in my lifetime and I’m not about to support a convention. To me you might as well check yourself into a euthanasia clinic and say, “I give up.”
NO!!!!!!