Excellent scholar, that man.
Pretty straight forward
Actually if you’re states rights you agree...and win.
But if you’re pro-life you lose. This means murdering babies is allowed to be ok by states. So cali can decide to murder babies at 9 months as it’s coming out of the womb just because the mom says I don’t want this baby—it has blue eyes!
It doesn’t matter. Current generation is too stupid to comprehend this kind of reasoning
Bookmark
There's nothing in the Constitution about homo marriage, or regular marriage for that matter. Another ruling pulled out of black robe ass.
Revisit it anyway, and force Alito to decide.
States should immediately enact restricts on homo marriage, and let it wind through the courts.
Same with sodomy. Nothing in the Constitution about the right to stick your thingy in another's man's booty.
Imagine if we had gotten Harriet Miers instead of Sam Alito? God knows what He’s doing.
However according to the media, the Court’s decision not only ends abortion everywhere, but ends women’s rights, bans contraception and bans gay marriage. The liberal elites would have use believe that women would now be treated no different than under the Taliban’s version of Islam. I am particularly galled by the quick condemnation by foreign leaders like Trudeau and especially the UN. It is utter hypocrisy that these same leaders are silent about the actual maltreatment of women in Muslim countries, but choose to criticize the US where the abortion issue is now up to the voters to decide.
The riots, demonstrations, grand standing are all political motivation.
>>Many on the left, including the dissenting justices, are freaking out that Clarence Thomas, in a non-binding concurring opinion, wrote that the decision calls into question old cases like gay marriage and access to birth control.
So, IIRC, did Breyer in his dissent.
IMO Thomas was correct in stating that any law made up out of thin air should be struck down. I also think that he mentioned those three particular cases just to tweak the leftists a bit.
Clarence Thomas presents as the Justice most cognixant of the real scope of the US Constitution, even though his concurring opinion is not binding on the Court or the Nation.
The people who do not like this ruling are upset because it does not outlaw abortion, it makes it harder to get one and it returns the feeling of guilt that society once imposed on those who do.
This is how the country is supposed to work. Congress writes the laws, not the Courts.
Unfortunately, our seditious public education system doesn’t teach those things.
This opinion could also be the the chink in the armor that begins the of power back to the States, where it should be, in others areas as well.