Posted on 06/25/2022 8:57:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Excellent scholar, that man.
Pretty straight forward
Actually if you’re states rights you agree...and win.
But if you’re pro-life you lose. This means murdering babies is allowed to be ok by states. So cali can decide to murder babies at 9 months as it’s coming out of the womb just because the mom says I don’t want this baby—it has blue eyes!
Rush would be smiling. Not gloating, not dancing a fool, but just smiling.
It doesn’t matter. Current generation is too stupid to comprehend this kind of reasoning
It’s a huge win for the pro-life side. It means that abortion can be argued on the basis of science instead of making all discussion moot by putting it beyond debate and into a judicial lockbox.
I have to disagree. If you want to murder babies move to a state that allows it. And stay the hell out of Idaho.
It’s true that this is not an all out victory over the scourge of abortion. A preborn baby’s right to life should be inherent and treated equally in every state and territory of the US.
Bookmark
There's nothing in the Constitution about homo marriage, or regular marriage for that matter. Another ruling pulled out of black robe ass.
Revisit it anyway, and force Alito to decide.
States should immediately enact restricts on homo marriage, and let it wind through the courts.
Same with sodomy. Nothing in the Constitution about the right to stick your thingy in another's man's booty.
As mentioned, one of the many things that bothered me was how it was argued on a right to privacy and not women’s rights. Even RBG had a issue with that. If it was argued on a women’s rights basis originally I would have had much more respect for any ruling.
Personally, the Mississippi law that permitted abortion up to 15 weeks was reasonable to me. Abortion really came on my radar when they began demanding access at any time for any reason, even just until the due date because the mother decided they didn’t want the child.
I took it to mean don’t try to expand this ruling. The same sex marriage is another issue. We are talking the right to kill babies here. Another case another ruling. IMO
I would argue why the Gov is involved in marriage in any way. As you said, it’s not in the constitution, they shouldn’t be involved.
There a few values or educated insights exhibited in an epicurean, decadent culture. The current dichotomy that exists in America is not unlike the political divide that existed in Rome at the end of the Republic.
Interesting that the abortionists in Congress make so much noise about losing in the supreme court when they could have taken abortion up in the legislative branch....but didn’t. Their apparent intention was to keep their own hands clean while tarnishing the judicial branch. No politician wants to run on passing abortion laws, no matter WHAT they say. That is why they pushed so hard to keep the stain on the court. Now if the progressive radicalists want to keep killing babies, they will have to answer to the people with the blood on their own hands instead of the courts hands. Looks like a new day for those without a voice to get one and a new dilemma for those loud mouthed politicians who have openly stated they will vote for abortion legislation but in reality will not run on it because THEY know that their chances of being elected or reelected for their stance on abortion will be just as dead as the babies they have killed over the past 50 years. My question to all abortionists is simple. Isn’t 50 years of baby killing enough for you?
I believe you are correct, FRiend. The last two major decisions by this court are reason to celebrate on some level, and Rush would be leading the party. Dang I miss him 😢.
Nice post. Regards
Imagine if we had gotten Harriet Miers instead of Sam Alito? God knows what He’s doing.
However according to the media, the Court’s decision not only ends abortion everywhere, but ends women’s rights, bans contraception and bans gay marriage. The liberal elites would have use believe that women would now be treated no different than under the Taliban’s version of Islam. I am particularly galled by the quick condemnation by foreign leaders like Trudeau and especially the UN. It is utter hypocrisy that these same leaders are silent about the actual maltreatment of women in Muslim countries, but choose to criticize the US where the abortion issue is now up to the voters to decide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.