Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Trolls AZ House Speaker Over Jan. 6 Testimony: He Better Hope There's No Tape of Our Conversation Re 2020 Election
Western Journal ^ | June 23, 2022 at 9:27am | Randy DeSoto, Patriot Project

Posted on 06/23/2022 3:28:44 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

Former President Donald Trump issued a statement ahead of Arizona House Speaker Russell Bowers’ Tuesday testimony before the Jan. 6 committee suggesting Trump may have a recording of a phone conversation the two had in November 2020 about the last presidential election.

During the hearing, Bowers testified about that call and another he had in December 2020 with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Trump regarding holding a hearing at the Arizona Capitol to review allegations of voter fraud.

The speaker recounted to the Jan. 6 committee that he flat-out refused the request, given Giuliani’s hoped-for end game would be to replace now-President Joe Biden’s electors with Trump ones if fraud could be shown to the satisfaction of a majority of state legislators.

Bowers further stated that Giuliani’s team provided no evidence that led him to believe there might have been widespread fraud.

In a Tuesday morning statement Trump issued before Bowers testified, the former president said, “Arizona Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers is the latest RINO to play along with the Unselect Committee.

“In November 2020, Bowers thanked me for getting him elected. He said he would have lost, and in fact expected to lose, if I hadn’t come along. During the conversation, he told me that the election was rigged and that I won Arizona,” Trump added.

Bowers won his 2020 re-election bid by nearly 10 percent to represent District 25, which is in Maricopa County in the city of Mesa.

“He said he got more votes than I did which could never have happened,” Trump recalled. Trump said Bowers acknowledged that he would not have been re-elected without the 45th president’s rallies.

Trump concluded, “Bowers should hope there’s not a tape of the conversation.”

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 202011; 202012; 2020election; 202206; arizona; becareful; bowers; donaldtrump; giuliani; j6; january6th; maricopacounty; recording; rigged; riggedelection; russellbowers; tape; tapes; trump; trumprallies; votefraud; voterfraud; warning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: circlecity

If you remember, Trump said the same thing to Comey.

“James Comey better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!”


21 posted on 06/23/2022 4:01:56 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Born in 1950

Remember the perfect phone call? Trump let Adam Schlitt play plenty of rope out before Trump produced the transcript.


22 posted on 06/23/2022 4:02:10 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

PDJT was the sitting prez at the time. Of course he has a tape. Stupid governor.


23 posted on 06/23/2022 4:13:13 PM PDT by TonyinLA ( I don't have sufficient information to make an informed opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The magical ballot.

What is the magical ballot?

I’ll tell ya.

The magical ballot was the ballot used by millions of Democrats to vote for Joe Biden.

Why was it magical?

Because it was a ballot that not only had Joe Biden on it it also had a bunch of other Democrats running for various offices. But magically, the only vote cast was just for Joe Biden and none of the other Democrats on the magical ballot.

It’s magic that based on all the millions of votes Biden received that all those Democrats down the ballot are not in office.......


24 posted on 06/23/2022 4:14:41 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyinLA

The problem with producing a tape it is will tell people that there are tapes of everything, which will make them subject to discovery of about any type.


25 posted on 06/23/2022 4:16:27 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

26 posted on 06/23/2022 4:19:24 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I do not like, not trust, Rusty Bowers.


27 posted on 06/23/2022 4:21:30 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

The actual plot to steal the election was mostly Democrats, but the Republicans are all in on the coverup, because they know they should have stopped it.

Rather than explain to their constituents why they sat there and did nothing - it’s much easier to just lie and say it didn’t happen.

It’s the same reason rape victims don’t testify against their attackers - they feel ashamed and would rather keep it secret and pretend it never happened.

Imagine being a Republican legislator from one of the swing states like PA - your constituents want to know why you let the Democrats steal it. The media calls you a conspiracy nut if you believe it was stolen. The Justice Department might even indict you for inciting an insurrection if you call the Biden administration illegitimate.

The easiest thing by far is to just go along with the fake news narrative that there was no fraud, that Trump is just a sore loser.


28 posted on 06/23/2022 4:24:39 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“I don’t know why you’re baffled. The Dems know there was fraud and they committed it. The last thing they want is to uncover it.”

It’s been a year and half already. If there was fraud, why haven’t we seen actual proof, evidence, brought to court, lawsuits, etc? Trump has raised millions of dollars to fund this, and still nothing.


29 posted on 06/23/2022 4:30:20 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Yawn. Big Wind: full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.


30 posted on 06/23/2022 4:39:09 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (The Reset is real…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

That would be a loser strategy. Leverage in the hand, produced at the right moment to do the most damage.


31 posted on 06/23/2022 4:40:02 PM PDT by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

We have seen the evidence & the evidence of crooked courts & prosecutors that wouldn’t allow the evidence to be presented in court.


32 posted on 06/23/2022 4:42:06 PM PDT by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

How many times has he said that? Has he ever delivered any such recordings?


33 posted on 06/23/2022 4:42:48 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

“We have seen the evidence & the evidence of crooked courts & prosecutors that wouldn’t allow the evidence to be presented in court.”

No we haven’t seen any evidence that would stand up in court.

To claim that everything, and everyone is in such a large conspiracy to deny Trump an election win, including a huge percentage of his own appointees, life long Republicans all claiming otherwise, under oath, or pleading the 5th is crazy. Put up or shut up.

Rudy was quoted as saying, we have lot’s of theories, but no evidence.


34 posted on 06/23/2022 4:48:28 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Coronal; JonPreston
How many times has he said that? Has he ever delivered any such recordings?

See posts 20-22 for proof that he has delivered on this before.
35 posted on 06/23/2022 4:51:10 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
If he had a tape, he would produce it. An idle threat right now means nothing.

Why would he produce it now?

If Trump has {or doesn't have} a tape, he'd do what he just did, tease.

36 posted on 06/23/2022 4:59:56 PM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Nope. The smart move would be to hold onto such evidence until needed as defense in a criminal case. Making such a recording public at this time would allow the persecutors, (oops, prosecutors), time to manufacture countering evidence. This is a long defense play. Make the other side worry about the possibility of exculpable evidence that will impeach the witness.


37 posted on 06/23/2022 5:42:35 PM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

We will have to agree to disagree. Anyone who could make that statement is not going to be convinced by evidence, affidavits, or scientific analysis. You might ask yourself why:

1. Maricopa County Republican Committee Executive Board To Reject 2020 Presidential Election After Election Audit and “2000 Mules” Documentary Prove Irrefutable Evidence of Fraud
2.
Texas GOP Passes Resolution Declaring Biden ‘Not Legitimately Elected’
Texas Republicans passed a resolution on June 18 stating that President Joe Biden was “not legitimately elected,” and that “substantial” election fraud in key metropolitan areas influenced the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Biden.
“We believe that the 2020 election violated Article 1 and 2 of the US Constitution, that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures (Excerpt) Read more at resistthemainstream.org ...


38 posted on 06/23/2022 6:01:55 PM PDT by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

Bowers must have testified in the woods. This is the first time his name has been mentioned.


39 posted on 06/23/2022 6:36:32 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

“Bowers must have testified in the woods. This is the first time his name has been mentioned.”

He testified Tuesday, under oath, in public hearings about Jan 6, along with other Republicans, who campaigned and voted for Trump, and said he would vote for Trump again should he get the nomination.


40 posted on 06/23/2022 6:46:16 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson