Posted on 05/09/2022 7:55:19 AM PDT by Starman417
Yesterday, on Mother's Day, pro-abortionists protested against Motherhood. They attempted to harass and intimidate Justices of the Supreme Court and their families. They are blocking and desecrating churches. They're screaming "Thank God for abortion."
If God gave us abortion, he also gave us 9-11, the Holocaust, COVID and Hitler.
Protesters do not appreciate the irony of trumpeting "my body, my choice" and "not your body" when just months ago they were demanding that everyone allow government to repeatedly stick a needle in their arms. They want government out of the bedroom but into the deltoids. The unvaccinated, who wanted choice for their own bodies, were declared to be the public enemy by the President and assorted ignorant celebrities. Leftists want it both ways, as they are wont to do.
Thus, government dictating what happens to one's body is a good thing or a bad thing, it just depends on the issue.
The thing is those demanding "my body, my choice" already have that option.
The same God who gave them abortion gave them birth control pills, a morning after pill and condoms. That God also gave them something else- the right to say no and the right to demand responsibility from their partners. The value of life in this country is on a downward trajectory in part courtesy of George Soros owned DA's and the "defund the police" movement. The focus on abortion as some kind of human right marginalizes the life that is created in the womb. And it is life.
If a unicellular organism was discovered on Mars or anywhere beyond Earth science would declare it to "life." That's a fact. Arguing that a 20-week fetus is not a life is self-delusional, an argument meant to blunt the guilt associated with fetal termination. Unborn sea turtles are protected by Federal law. Unborn eagles are protected by Federal law. Unborn human babies are not. Activists seek the protection of their elimination.
3D fetal sonograms make clear that fetuses are babies and not "clumps of cells."
A fetus is a body in a body. Women are caretakers of that body within until birth. It's that way all through the animal kingdom on Earth. Abortion as birth control is heinous. So is post-birth abortion. It's not hard to imagine democrats promoting abortions for kids up to 5 years of age.
It is good to review the creation of Planned Parenthood by Margaret Sanger. The original intent of Planned Parenthood was to eliminate the black population.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Technically, Overturning Roe will make abortion subject to real representative democracy as the legislatures will be the body that writes the laws.
Enough with the objectivity already. /s
They don’t have this conflict in England. Abortion is legal-decided by the voters not the courts.
I remember driving by a protest at Planned Parenthood. An old guy held up a big poster of an aborted fetus. Gruesome. This is what the left is afraid of. Since then ultrasound has made us more aware.
We need to set up a national registry of adoptive parent volunteers.. Do it now. Strike while the iron is hot. It’s about healing, not anger.
The left has no intention of letting people decide for themselves what course their nation and lives will take.
It was hilarious listening to a Liz Warren, little blue fist raised & quivering with rage, assert this ruling overturned the will of a majority of the American people when the precise opposite is true.
It’s a short step from murdering babies to murdering adults.
Are the Democrats, against democracy? Are Democrats with a capital “D”, opposed to being democratic, with a small “d”?
The liberal view is that the American people want Roe vs. Wade upheld, and that the American people want legalized abortion.
If that’s true, then the states will pass abortion laws which the liberals prefer. If abortion is really that popular in this country, then that will be expressed through the democratic process.
So why then, are the liberals so opposed to what’s expected in this opinion? If this opinion is finalized as expressed in the leak, then state legislatures will be the entities which make abortion laws. If abortion really so popular, then the Democrats and liberals and leftists will be happy with the results.
Or do the oppose the legislative process? Do they really want judges in Washington, DC, deciding everything?
Also, how is Planned Parenthood able to sell body parts (head, liver, kidneys, lungs, arms, legs, etc.) if a fetus is just a "clump of cells"! Hmmmmm?
One of the most attractive women I’ve ever seen. Is she still active on FR?
I love how the author refused to capitalize democrat(s). :-)
Why not up til the time of college graduation?
Abortion is indeed a thought provoking subject.
I wonder if our various subcultures have, statistically speaking, different views. If so could this be accommodated in our law? Haven’t we read that in some cities Muslim communities operate under their own set of laws?
I am hoping that after Roe is overturned, many communists flee red states back to their rat nests.
But, they are just threatening that as they threaten to leave the country when their guy doesn’t win.
A ruling by the court should NEVER be interpreted as law.
A ruling is just a decision regarding a case that appeared before the court. A decision by a court is not established law.
Established law comes from the legislative branch of the government, and judges interpret laws that have been passed by legislatures.
Roe v Wade did not result from any established law. It was a ruling by a decidedly left-wing-leaning court and it did not result from interpretation of the constitution or the bill-of-right or any other law.
Any ruling can be considered not to be law. That’s the only thing that the SCOTUS is about to do with Roe v Wade. Since Roe v Wade is not law, the judges are not overturning any law(s).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.