Nonsense. There is speculation that Hitler may have had Jewish blood, as well as, African blood. I say speculation because Hitler himself was not available to submit his blood for DNA analysis. Instead his still surviving family members submitted blood tests and were found to have traces of both Jewish and African blood traits. That means either DNA is unreliable or these blood traits started appearing in later family members beyond Hitler himself.
The real question is, are these people who are white and identify themselves as committer BLM supporters consensual or are they there as a result of intimidation? The same applies to Jews like Soros. Were they consensual collaborators or were they intimidated to become collaborators merely to save themselves? Soros claims that his participation was consensual, but due to intimidation and his ability to pass himself off as not being Jewish, accounts for his collaboration for self preservation.
Either way he was guilty of collaborating with Nazis to plunder and then exterminate his fellow Jewish brethren. That we know is the case by his own admissions.
Can't blame the Russians for seizing on that, because there is a wisp of truth to the claim, even though it remains pure speculation when it comes to Hitler himself. Bennett just refuses to except that fact, and instead wants to claim they are trying to blame Jews for the Holocaust.
The question is, is Zelenskyy supporting the Nazis in Ukraine, or is his life being threatened by the Nazis unless he accepts their demands?
You see, nothing is really as straight forward at all, when it comes to this war.
Hitler did not believe he had non Aryan blood nor did he consider himself be "Jewish." So even if Lavrov was right about being vierteljude, it doesn't matter, nor does his sentence make any sense.
True