Posted on 04/11/2022 9:33:41 AM PDT by blam
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Monday issued a new warning against Finland and Sweden seeking NATO membership, after the Sunday Times reported that “Finland’s application is expected in June, with Sweden expected to follow.”
Peskov said that “the alliance remains a tool geared towards confrontation” – but Washington is said to be supporting the move, with Western officials cited as saying that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is proving to be a “massive strategic blunder”.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin. Image: Finnish govt
It was first revealed last week that Finland in particular has changed its thinking regarding its historic neutrality on the NATO question; however, there would be a period of domestic political debate before any application is made, and also with Sweden expected to determine its course independently.
After those reports first emerged days ago, a Russia lawmaker from parliament’s upper house, Vladimir Dzhabarov of the Federation Council, issued the most dire warning from among Moscow officials, threatening that such a “strategic mistake” as Helsinki petitioning NATO means Finland “would become a target.”
“I think it [would be] a terrible tragedy for the entire Finnish people,” said Dzhabarov. He also strongly suggested it would result in “the destruction of their country.”
He expressed hope that it’s unlikely that “the Finns themselves will sign a card for the destruction of their country” – as originally cited in RIA Novosti. The Finnish foreign ministry subsequently said it “does not comment on the statements of individual MPs” when asked to respond.
According to a recent Axios report, “60% of Finns now support joining NATO, according to a survey conducted last month — a 34-point jump from last fall, and the highest level since polling on the issue began in 1998.”
Map: The Daily Mail
Early this month Finland’s Prime Minister Sanna Marin signal a complete reversal of policy direction, saying that a “new security environment” in Europe brought on by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine means the country has to rethink its long-standing policy of neutrality toward the NATO bloc. “Russia is not the neighbor we thought it was,” she said of Moscow’s ongoing assault on Ukraine, calling it a “flagrant violation”.
“In this new situation and changed security environment, we’ll have to evaluate all means to guarantee the safety of Finland and Finns,” Marin said. “We’ll have to seriously mull over our own stance and approach to military alignment. We’ll have to do this carefully but quickly, effectively during the course of this spring.”
Expanding NATO was not part of MAGA circa 2016.
***NATO wasn’t paying their fair share of the burden in 2016, and probably still aren’t. Making them pay their fair share does MAGA. As it pertains to Ukraine, who already had a MAP in place, it made sense to expand NATO to them else Russia wouldn’t have invaded. There’s a bit of a large duhh factor to that part of the equation.
You got Finns to the left, Finns to the right, and you're the only bait in town.
Go ahead Putin and pull NATO in and see what you’ve got left when it’s over.
The way things are looking, the best bet for any of the countries butting up against Russia would be to play Switzerland, the way it used to be.
The way Switzerland used to be before the 1700s was the country that sent the most mercenaries to fight all over Europe.
That legacy is seen in the Vatican swiss guards.
Switzerland was conquered by Napoleon.
It only became neutral after their own civil war in the mid 1800s.
Also, the swiss were next to be conquered by Germany after the Soviet union was crushed. They just got lucky.
Now with Putin’s aggression, a new NATO rule should be 2% spend or else the get 2 years notice to leave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.