Posted on 04/03/2022 8:14:18 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
A detailed list of the destroyed and captured vehicles and equipment of both sides can be seen below. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
Running total
4/3 - 401
4/2 - 389
4/1 - 362
3/31 - 350
3/30 - 342
3/29 - 331
3/28 - 316
3/27 - 307
3/26 - 297
3/25 - 289
3/24 - 280
3/23 - 275
3/22 - 270
3/21 - 263
3/20 - 257
3/19 - 251
3/18 - 244
3/17 - 235
3/16 - 229
3/15 - 217
3/14 - 209
3/13 - 204
3/12 - 193
3/11 - 187
3/10 - 164
3/9 - 156
3/8 - 149
3/7 - 140
3/6 - 120
3/5 - 108
As noted on the website: "This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here.
Dead Invaders.
“The Deputy Commander of the VDV’s 83rd Air Assault Brigade, Lieutenant Colonel Vitaly Slabtsov, was killed in Ukraine (h/t @VDV_Textbooks). The 11th Air Assault Brigade’s deputy commander was killed earlier in the war.”
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1509913531080187916
“Major Ruslan Petrukhin, a graduate of the Kazan Higher Military Command School and a deputy battalion commander in the 38th Motorized Rifle Brigade, was killed in Ukraine.”
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1506420748382048265
“Captain Alexander Fomashin, a RVVDKU graduate, was killed in Ukraine likely while serving in a VDV unit. He was buried in Ryazan.”
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1510037860811956225
“Dmitry Karpov, a member of the VDV’s 31st Air Assault Brigade, was killed in Ukraine.”
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1510426416894066688
Crossed 400! 1/3 of original 1200 tanks are destroyed or captured.
It’s over. Please concentrate on the Texas border.
And that’s just tanks. Doesn’t include other armored vehicles, etc. I have gotten to like your source site there. Photographic evidence to back up every number. Thanks for keeping the running tally. The one down side to the sight is as it updates, I can’t find a way to go back and see the numbers from the previous days.
Ukraine captures 4 Russian aircraft carriers, a dozen warships and all Russian military personnel of general rank & lower. Ukraine occupies and annexes the Siberian,Ural and Volga regions.
Next up: Ukraine crushes the Martian forces in “Independence Day, Part 15”.
Another Russian T-72B3, abandoned along with a TMM-3M2 heavy mechanized bridge.
Some more Russian armour was destroyed/abandoned whilst trying to cross flooded areas near #Irpin, including 3x BMD-2 and a likely 9S932-2 intelligence and control vehicle (Part of the Barnaul-T AD system)
You need to stop believing everything the MSM tells you.
More vehicles lost by the Russian army during the retreat from #Chernihiv Oblast - a captured 1V14 battery command and forward observer vehicle and a destroyed Ural-based MTO-UB1 maintenance workshop.
Ukraine claims a bit more.
Russia’s losses as of April 3
Source: Indicative estimates by Ukraine’s Armed Forces as of 11 a.m. EET
18,000 troops (approx., to be confirmed)
143 planes
105 MLRS
7 boats
134 helicopters
1,249 vehicles
644 tanks
76 fuel tanks
325 artillery pieces
89 UAV
1.830 armored personnel carriers
54 anti-aircraft warfare
4 mobile SRBM system
24 special equipment
THE KYIV INDEPENDENT
“You need to stop believing everything the MSM tells you.”
—
They are the main spreaders of same sunshiny Neo-Con-Lib-Neverending-War propaganda fed them by the Biden WH as is repeated here. Anything contrary is banned from reportage and/or blocked.
So, I say, might as well go for the best imaginings possible. Maybe throw in a image or two to try sell the fictions.
I’m just worried that unstoppable mighty Ukraine military won’t stop at conquering Russia and come after us via Bering!
Xi asked Putin to start after the Olympic. Apparently, that is part of Russian problems. After the Winter, huge areas of Ukraine turn into mud swamps.
As you see on pictures, the Russian equipment’s have invariably drown in these swamps!
Then you just need few Gypsies to pull the equipment out and you done. Another tank lost!
From Michael Kofman:
@KofmanMichael
Follow up thread on Russian force availability and long-term prospects. The Russian military has taken significant casualties. After redeploying, and pulling additional units from standing formations, it may be tapped out of available forces, for now. Thread 1/
If the Russian leadership wants to continue this war it has to make a significant political choice. They cannot sustain a long war against Ukraine as a special operation, and they don’t want to reframe it as a war. This has implications for force availability. 2/
Moscow is trying to fight a war with the largest country in Europe without declaring a state of war at home. Ukraine has fully mobilized, and has extensive Western support. Russia may technically have more manpower and materiel on paper, but it is politically inaccessible. 3/
The Russian military is not prepared for a long war, and expected this ‘operation’ to be done within days. Now a significant part of the force is exhausted. As a very rough estimate, they may have lost ~30 battalions (not BTGs) worth of equipment. 4/
Although the Russian military has a lot of kit, assuming a 200,000 force deployed with more than 120 BTGs involved, separatist army corps, and Rosgvardia, that military now has substantially reduced combat effectiveness. 5/
The Russian military has pulled together what they could from the remaining standing force, including bases abroad, and Kaliningrad. There’s now close to nothing left to send beyond those battalions that have recently arrived to support offensives in the Donbas. 6/
It is difficult to say what constitutes the current ground force available for the next phase in the war. I don’t like low confidence numbers since they give a false sense of certainty. 7/
I would say it is still a significant, but substantially diminished force. Best guess is ~80 BTGs total. I would take that number with a grain of salt, keeping in mind that BTGs are used here as a rough unit of measurement. 8/
There is also no evidence of stoploss. The Russian military is taking in 134,500 conscripts this month as part of a biannual draft & releasing those whose terms of service have expired. Since Moscow has not declared a war, it has no political basis for retaining conscripts. 9/
So how is the Russian leadership trying to square this circle? There are rumors that they’re offering sizable payouts to those willing to sign a contract, including conscripts getting out of service, and those with prior military experience. 10/
There are also cases where conscripts are intimidated into switching to contract service - sometimes given the choice between months of difficult serving conditions and signing a contract. 11/
Behind the scenes the Russian military is likely trying to increase manning in formations. These are often manned at ~75%, hence the tiered readiness system with contract-staffed BTGs. Many have heard of Shoigu’s 168 BTG figure. I think this number is technically committed. 12/
Brigades and regiments are generally supposed to generate 2 BTGs, and be able to produce a 3rd over time with increased manning. The Russian military expected to raise those manning levels via mobilization in the event of a war - they’re likely trying to do it piecemeal now. 13/
By offering substantial amounts of ₽ to get more manpower, the Russian military may fill out some of these formations. In my view, they may then deploy as battalions and entire units, since many unit HQs & support elements are in the war already. 14/
There are also auxiliary forces. Syrian mercs, Wagner ChvK, etc. These are not going to make a difference in this war. They can amount to a few battalions more at best. They’re symptomatic of the problem: Russia is short on troops, looking to get manpower where they can. 15/
In short, Russia can get more battalions, but without a national mobilization its ability to pursue the war beyond the Donbas looks very circumspect. And it can’t get more units quickly. Right now, the Russian mil has to fight largely with what it has managed to put together. 16/
This problem is somewhat unsurprising. The Russian mil was built around the concept of active defense, eschewing strategic ground offensives. It lacks the logistics, and manpower, to sustain this kind of fight in the largest country in Europe. 17/
However, if Putin chooses to declare a state of war, conduct national mobilization, the situation becomes a lot more complicated. In that case, Russian manpower and materiel availability would be subject to a decidedly different set of calculations. 18/
Would he have the domestic support to do it? Entirely up for debate. There appears to be substantial support for the war within the Russian public, but it is uneven, and extent of true support vs fake poll reporting highly disputed. 19/
Conversely, Ukraine is going to need ammunition and more equipment to replace losses, equip reserves. It needs mechanized equipment for counter-offensives. ATGMs and MANPADS alone won’t do. Hence the ask for Soviet equipment from countries that have inventories. 20/
I’m sure some folks will say - but Ukraine has captured a lot of equipment. On paper, yes, but it’s going to be a while before this kit is serviceable, manned, and deployed where it makes a tangible difference. A few captured tanks or IFVs do not an armored brigade make. 21/
In some ways this is a story of one military which has large amounts of mobilized manpower, but shortages of kit to equip the force, and another military which has large reserves of equipment, but a visible crunch in available manpower without national mobilization. 22/
Beyond the current battle in the Donbas, if this eventually becomes a prolonged war of attrition, Ukraine seems overall in a more favorable position, but I think the honest answer is ‘it depends.’ That’s my unsatisfactory conclusion thus far.
“Just In: #British anti-ship ‘Harpoons’ are already in Odesa.
Range 200 km.”
” Propaganda, propaganda, propaganda. All that matters is propaganda.” -Adolf Hitler 1924
“Just In: #British anti-ship ‘Harpoons’ are already in Odesa. Range 200 km.”
That would put Stevastopol within range.
Getting them to Odessa this fast would be a challenge. I’m skeptical until I see the video of Russian ships sinking. But if not there yet, they are on the way. Boris Johnson is determined to see Little Pukin fail.
https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1510697124299689985
thread by a generally good fellow doubting this.
one point he makes:
“... Russia has enough surface warfare combatants in the Black Sea right now to make any piecemeal ASM attack pretty ineffective. It’s probably the one area that they have a very solid air defense umbrella.”
Would love it if Ukraine can keep Russia from taking all their coast and connecting to Transnistra- which Ukraine would have to defeat the R navy to do.
Funny... I think Putin is afraid to reduce Odessa to rubble to take it. Which he’d have to do. Would look very bad at home, Russians have a soft spot for Odessa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
