Posted on 03/20/2022 5:10:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Dominion voting machines were used across the country in various states and counties. Yet, since the 2020 Election, not one single independent, objective and complete audit of the Dominino machines used in the 2020 Election has taken place.
Dominion voting machines were used across the country in the 2020 election, not in all states but in many. But these machines have not been completely audited by independent and objective experts at any location since the 2020 Election.
We reported today that in the small audit of the county in New Mexico, the state is threatening the county with having to buy new machines if the county dares have anyone investigate these machines.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“People haven’t figured this out yet? Both parties were in on it.” Exactly right at ALL levels of gov’t. The Establishment banded together to eliminate a Man of the People to protect their personal and political, corrupt interests.
There should not be any proprietary software used in elections, period.
our local congress critter is going to be in for a rude surprise during the primary.
Mostly it was about getting Trump out before he could stop the Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA) that both parties have been working on for 30 years.
That’s not losing. That’s fraud.
What does that video purport to show?
It makes zero sense to make a voting machine that doesn’t count votes correctly.
It makes a lot of sense to print a million ballots, mail them everywhere, don’t check signatures, don’t check for citizenship, pay people to harvest them, put out anonymous drop boxes for collecting then, and count them using machines that have a 99.999 accuracy of counting them. That is, if you want to cheat.
A bounty system for illegal vote harvesting might have helped. Voter ID and good rolls might have helped.
See my tagline.
Both teams are dirty
It’s not the machine. It’s the software.
And it makes perfect sense, especially if you have to steal a landslide.
It could have been the machines too.
It’s hard to tell how many of the reports were false and how many were true.
Bingo!
I saw a Dominion TRAINING VIDEO where they explained how you would “re-create” a ballot that was rejected by their scanner.
They explained how there was a ‘library’ of different shaped blobs that would randomly be used to fill in the circle, to “protect the privacy” [of the machine that created the ballot???], and how the original would be destroyed.
Any one listening should have been thinking “holy crap that’s a sure-fire method to destroy and manufacture votes” - but Democrats were probably loving it.
That is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you should do.
You should NEVER EVER EVER destroy an original, and any computer re-created ballots should be CLEARLY MARKED that is was a re-generation and the original attached to it- for auditing purposes.
IS THERE NO ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS COMPUTER SYSTEMS AUDITING?????
Antrim County did a hand count audit of the election results.
The results were virtually identical to the machine count.
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Antrim_720623_7.pdf
There are paper ballots. When hand counted, they match the results.
How does “software” change the hand counted results versus the totals counted by machine?
Look all you want but there was no Kraken in the voting machines. Stupid conspiracy that got Trump and friends distracted until they too late gave Rudy and Miss Crazy the boot.
The kraken was turning off the signature verification. Not prosecuting voter fraud. Not investigating hundreds of ballots going to a single address. Mailing them to dead and moved people. You think all the undeliverable ballots got properly destroyed?
Read the report generated by Antrim County, Michigan. It’s all in there.
Mr. DOMINION
for $200.
Please.
.
Bow to
Our Overlord.
👍
That was a misconfigured machine. In I think one polling place. Not a secret program unleashed to “flip votes”. They programmed the machine with the wrong ballot. It was caught. Yeah, maybe it happened more, but again, nothing that wouldn’t be easily caught in a hand count. Which there were plenty.
Did they try to discern fraudulent ballots?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.