Posted on 03/15/2022 5:27:29 AM PDT by Red Badger
Who is Don Berlin? was Don Berlin working for and who backed his efforts to set up President Trump for sedition in early January 2021?
We reported in late December that information from the Deep State dossier created by Don Berlin presented to President Trump right before Jan 6 was leaked to the media as soon as Mark Meadows provided it to the Jan 6 Committee in December 2021 per the committee’s subpoena.
Deep State operative Don Berlin created a bogus dossier and presented it to President Trump related to the 2020 Election a few days before his rally on January 6th at the Capitol. We produced support for this in Parts 1,2 and 3 in this series included in the article below.
Information from this bogus dossier was then summarized and provided to a group of individuals in the Trump White House, including the President’s Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows. CNN reported on December 9th that President Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows provided documents to the Jan 6 Committee.
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided the House select committee investigating the January 6 riot with text messages and emails that show he was “exchanging with a wide range of individuals while the attack was underway,” according to a source with knowledge of the communications.
The messages on Meadows’ personal cell phone and email account, which were voluntarily handed over without any claim of executive privilege, relate to “what Donald Trump was doing and not doing during the riot,” the source added.
These communications offer a window into what people were texting to Meadows on January 6, what he was telling them about Trump in real time, and what the former President was doing for those hours while the Capitol was under attack and rioters were chanting “Hang Mike Pence,” according to the source. The far-left Rolling Stone website reported on a PowerPoint presentation included in Meadows’ emails provided to the Jan 6 Committee on December 9th as well.
The House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol has obtained a trove of electronic messages from former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, including an email referring to a PowerPoint suggesting Trump could declare a national security emergency in order to delay the certification of the results of the 2020 election.
The revelation is the latest indication that Trump and his inner circle, including his allies in Congress, were very actively and very aggressively trying to overturn the results of the election, which Trump lost handily.
The PowerPoint presentation, which spanned 38 pages and was titled “Election fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN,” was part of an email sent on Jan. 5, the day before the attack on the Capitol. The email pertained to a briefing that was to be provided “on the hill.” Hugo Lowell of The Guardian tweeted slides from the presentation on Thursday detailing a conspiracy theory-laden plan for Vice President Pence to install Republican electors in states “where fraud occurred,” and for Trump to declare a national emergency and for all electronic voting to be rendered invalid, citing foreign “control” of electronic voting systems.
The Deep State’s favorite Mainstream Media outlet, the New York Times, the Deep State’s choice for dropping garbage hit pieces on President Trump, reported on the bogus PowerPoint presentation on December 10th:
Jan. 6 Committee Examines PowerPoint Document Sent to Meadows
Mark Meadows’s lawyer said the former White House chief of staff did not act on the document, which recommended that President Donald J. Trump declare a national emergency to keep himself in power.
This same news story was then reported at the Boston Globe later that day:
The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol is scrutinizing a 38-page PowerPoint document filled with extreme plans to overturn the 2020 election that Mark Meadows, the last chief of staff to President Donald Trump, has turned over to the panel.
The document recommended that Trump declare a national emergency to delay the certification of the election results and included a claim that China and Venezuela had obtained control over the voting infrastructure in a majority of states.
A lawyer for Meadows, George J. Terwilliger III, said Friday that Meadows provided the document to the committee because he merely received it by email in his inbox and did nothing with it.
“We produced the document because it wasn’t privileged,” Terwilliger said. Phil Waldron, a retired Army colonel and an influential voice in the movement to challenge the election, said Friday from a bar he owns outside Austin, Texas, that he had circulated the document — titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN” — among Trump’s allies and on Capitol Hill before the attack. Waldron said that he did not personally send the document to Meadows, but that it was possible someone on his team had passed it along to the former chief of staff.
We asked the following questions in December:
How did the Jan 6 Committee know to obtain this memo from Mark Meadows? Why was this leaked so fast after being obtained by the Jan 6 Committee? Who on the Committee leaked this PowerPoint presentation? How many more Deep State set up’s took place against President Trump? Today we have another question – Who was paying Don Berlin to put together this presentation?
In Part 3 of our series above, we provided the dossier that Don Berlin presented to President Trump and other entitled “The Foot Patrol”. In this document, there is a caveat that shares the following:
Was the US DOD (Department of Defense) behind this dossier? The above caveat suggests that DOD analysts created the dossier. We also know and reported in Part 3 of this series (embedded above) that Don Berlin told the FBI in June 2016 that he worked as a defense contractor.
Another possibility is that Berlin was paid by individuals outside of the government. He claims that there were no US government data sources used in its making. This would indicate that the individuals supporting Berlin were non-government individuals.
We noted in Part 3 that Berlin’s dossier appears connected to Republicans because he presented it before a group of Republican leaders and President Trump sometime in the early days of January 2021. Berlin actually was there to present the dossier he prepared to the President. We know this from a trusted and verified source.
Another scenario is that Berlin was paid for by foreign sources. Maybe it was all three of these scenarios. Regardless, we shall soon have better information on who’s behind the Berlin dossier.
The longer the Deep State lives, the more America dies.
A useless hanger-on who along with Mary Fanning and Dennis Montgomery led people on a snipe hunt for network packet captures that showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that the election results were manipulated.
Please, please, no looking behind the curtains. What’s the latest DofD report detailing Putin’s war crimes as reported on “The Five” and bandied about here?
No need to read further.
Absolute BS! Pure #ComDem_Insanity!
Joe Hoft says Trump “lost handily”?
Since when? Before or after the added 6 million “votes” to get Basement Joe to the magical 81 million?
Berlin is in the same cadre who forwarded the bogus Steele Report. Belin is the one who should be investigated for sedition.
As I read further?
“The longer the Deep State lives, the more America dies.”
Totally agree.
I’m trying to figure out what this article is saying. Can someone help?
Is the article saying that, this guy Berlin sends a detailed email to Meadows that outlines a narrative that Trump could challenge the results of the election based on several rumored election fraud contentions.
The email was never acted on, by Meadows, never sent to Trump and the contents never acted on by Trump
but, it was planted so that soon afterwards, it was leaked to the media to link Trump with a conspiracy to overturn the election results on January 6.
IOWs, they planted the email so to look that it showed proof of what Trump was going to do.
Is this how everyone else sees this?
“The revelation is the latest indication that Trump and his inner circle, including his allies in Congress, were very actively and very aggressively trying to overturn the results of the election, which Trump lost handily.”
The results of the election were overturned to ensure that Trump lost. And the lame stream media, Dims, and Deep State have been covering up ever since.
It all goes back to the satanic demons HIllary and Obama folks. But Obama is untouchable since we live in a perpetual state of fear over a word. The R word.
“ the results of the election, which Trump lost handily”
No need to read further.”
That’s where I stopped too.
Reading the whole article, i think that he mean’t to say “won handily”.
How do you set someone up for sedition who isn’t vulnerable or slanted in that direction to begin with?
With lies, half truths..........................
Very poorly presented as copy-pasted by Red Badger. I forgive Red Badger, who is relatively a newcomer, for omitting the necessary formatting that puts the content in proper context.
The sections that are specious and offensive to common sense are quotes from CNN and other garbage propaganda.
Look over the actual report here:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/exclusive-backed-don-berlin-paid-dossier-created-set-president-trump-sedition
Guess that may be so.
I am conditioned to read something like that and my eyes glaze over. And my head shakes.
Thanks.
{quote}Very poorly presented as copy-pasted by Red Badger. I forgive Red Badger, who is relatively a newcomer, for omitting the necessary formatting that puts the content in proper context.
The sections that are specious and offensive to common sense are quotes from CNN and other garbage propaganda.
Look over the actual report here:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/exclusive-backed-don-berlin-paid-dossier-created-set-president-trump-sedition
{/quote}
That was very helpful, pointing that out, Hostage.
But Red Badger’s profile/homepage on FR has been “removed by moderator.” So, do you still conclude that is was a benign posting, just poorly done (the link to the actual report WAS given by Red Badger), or is there something more, shall we say (eyebrows wiggling up and down)...deep state-ish about this? Just wondering out loud, with electrons.
I don’t know.
I tend to be forgiving.
but that it was possible someone on his team had passed it along to the former chief of staff. (NOT directly quoted as his exact words.)
NO! but that it was possible someone on his team had passed it along to the chief of staff.
Urinalists!
Meadows was the CURRENT Chief of Staff at the time, NOT “former”.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.