Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC quietly lowers early childhood speech standards
Post Millenial ^ | February 18, 2022 | N/A

Posted on 02/19/2022 9:28:03 AM PST by DoodleBob

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has quietly changed their standards for early childhood development, as the effects of pandemic policies on children’s development, from speech to reading to other basics, becomes increasingly more apparent.

Earlier this month, the CDC announced that new checklist ages for its important milestone lists were added. These new ages added were 15 and 30 months.

The update banner at the top of the page points those interested in the updates to the developmental milestones to a Pediatrics article outlining the research conducted that resulted in the change.

The CDC just quietly lowered the standards for speech in early childhood development.

Now children should know ~50 words at 30mo rather than 24mo.

Instead of highlighting the harmful effects ?s & lockdowns have had on children, the CDC just lowered the bar for milestones. pic.twitter.com/11QraOgFbJ— BowTiedRanger (@BowTiedRanger) February 18, 2022

One of the authors of this study, Jennifer M. Zubler, said that the changes were made to the guidelines ensure that it reflects milestones that at least 75 percent of children can reach. Since children are no longer able reach these previously attainable milestones, they have been lowered.

The abstract states: "Application of the criteria established by the AAP working group and adding milestones for the 15- and 30-month health supervision visits resulted in a 26.4 percent reduction and 40.9 percent replacement of previous CDC milestones. One third of the retained milestones were transferred to different ages; 67.7 percent of those transferred were moved to older ages."

Before, the milestone guidelines said that at 24 months, or two years of age, a child should be able to say more than 50 words. This milestone has been pushed back to 30 months.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostmillennial.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cdc; socialskills; speech; speechdevelopment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
The full abstract (PS...you have to pay for the actual study...hmmm...funded with tax dollars...maybe so they can harvest data for dozing?) reads

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Learn the Signs. Act Early. program, funded the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to convene an expert working group to revise its developmental surveillance checklists. The goals of the group were to identify evidence-informed milestones to include in CDC checklists, clarify when most children can be expected to reach a milestone (to discourage a wait-and-see approach), and support clinical judgment regarding screening between recommended ages. Subject matter experts identified by the AAP established 11 criteria for CDC milestone checklists, including using milestones most children (≥75%) would be expected to achieve by specific health supervision visit ages and those that are easily observed in natural settings. A database of normative data for individual milestones, common screening and evaluation tools, and published clinical opinion was created to inform revisions. Application of the criteria established by the AAP working group and adding milestones for the 15- and 30-month health supervision visits resulted in a 26.4% reduction and 40.9% replacement of previous CDC milestones. One third of the retained milestones were transferred to different ages; 67.7% of those transferred were moved to older ages. Approximately 80% of the final milestones had normative data from ≥1 sources. Social-emotional and cognitive milestones had the least normative data. These criteria and revised checklists can be used to support developmental surveillance, clinical judgment regarding additional developmental screening, and research in developmental surveillance processes. Gaps in developmental data were identified particularly for social-emotional and cognitive milestones.

1 posted on 02/19/2022 9:28:03 AM PST by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

DOXXING, not dozing!


2 posted on 02/19/2022 9:28:42 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

The CDC just quietly lowered the standards for speech in early childhood development.

Now children should know ~50 words at 30mo rather than 24mo.

because an ignorant and unquestioning child is a compliant future citizen.


3 posted on 02/19/2022 9:30:26 AM PST by Flick Lives (The CDC. Brought to you by Pfizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Well, if some of those words are “Fauci is a lying piece of excrement” then I’d be ok with that.


4 posted on 02/19/2022 9:32:24 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

So much evil.

How anyone can not see this as a graven political move to cover the forced masking.

Deep spiritual blindness.

No we are to believe the science of childhood development over the last 100 years was wrong and actually all those children who met the previous milestones were abnormal?


5 posted on 02/19/2022 9:34:32 AM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10247315/Face-masks-harm-childrens-development-Study-blames-significantly-reduced-development.html

COVID rules are blamed for 23% dive in young children’s development: Disturbing study shows scores in three key cognitive tests slumped between 2018 and 2021, with face mask rules among possible culprits

Face masks and other social distancing measures may in fact impede on children’s development, a new study executed by Brown University has found

The probe analyzed the cognitive development of the youngsters through infancy, childhood and adolescence

In the study, researchers first analyzed 1,070 assessments administered on 605 kids prior to March 2020, when COVID lockdowns and masking began

A further 154 assessments from 118 kids administered between March 2020 and June 2021, during the height of the pandemic, were then carried out

Thirty-nine children born in 2018 and 2019 were analyzed over the course of the pandemic, into 2021.

The report found that there was a 23 per cent drop in scores measuring kids’ intelligence quotients since the start of the pandemic

The study also found similar dips in the same span in regards to developing children’s ability to communicate, both verbally and though subtle facial cues


6 posted on 02/19/2022 9:35:46 AM PST by COUNTrecount ("I've always won, and I'm going to continue to win. And that's the way it is." -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

But, but, BUT...

I thought that masks DIDN’T IMPAIR CHILD/SPEECH DEVELOPMENT???

/s

This

“According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “the limited available data indicate no clear evidence that masking impairs emotional or language development in children.”

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-02-masks-classhow-child.html

vs. this

“If children’s “social and language development is a little bit slower, which it could be, balancing that with the risk of someone dying of the coronavirus – when all the evidence we have indicates that they will catch up and they will be OK – just doesn’t seem worth it to me,” said Amy Learmonth, a professor of psychology at William Paterson University in New Jersey.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/11/health/masks-child-development-effects-covid-pandemic-wellness/index.html

The OP outlines how tyrants view mea culpa.


7 posted on 02/19/2022 9:36:54 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

“That’s the news from Lake Wobegon, where all the women are strong (because of their Y chromosomes), all the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average (after renorming the standards).”


8 posted on 02/19/2022 9:38:22 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Dictatorship: now available in maple flavor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Because it’s harder for a toddler to learn to talk, or understand others talking, in a distant, nosebagged, world.


9 posted on 02/19/2022 9:38:30 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Maybe COVID restrictions and masks have nothing to do with it.

I had to stop watching video clips of Joe Biden because I could feel IQ points dribbling away from me every time I saw one. :-P

10 posted on 02/19/2022 9:41:28 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
Wow...Dr Amy flip flops like Fauci...

“When young children are learning the basics of being social beings, their parents and siblings can provide most of the input they need,” says Amy Learmonth, Ph.D., a developmental psychologist who runs the Cognition, Memory and Development Lab at William Paterson University in New Jersey and has studied children as young as eight weeks old. In fact, having parents and siblings home much of the time actually can be a boon for children age five and younger. Conversely, Learmonth says older children and adolescents develop social skills by learning to “navigate complex social groups of peers.” Prolonged isolation from peers could be stripping opportunities to naturally develop social skills, particularly the longer social distancing goes on.

11 posted on 02/19/2022 9:41:40 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

The no accountability crowed at the CDC wants you to believe they have your best and most precious interests at stake. That supposedly justifies their rampant coercion and predation.


12 posted on 02/19/2022 9:42:33 AM PST by Track9 (Agamemnon came home to a HRC type party. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Covering for the covax damage that is, and will, occur


13 posted on 02/19/2022 9:51:15 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

“Science” argument went out the door when politics trumped common sense.

The coming year will see a host of ‘shifting’ positions as CYA.


14 posted on 02/19/2022 9:58:14 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob; All
The states have never expressly constitutionally given the federal government the specific power to make policy for children's standards.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

So these so-called children's standards established by the non-elected bureaucrats running the constitutionally undefined CDC are an unconstitutional expansion of the already unconstitutionally big federal government's powers imo.


15 posted on 02/19/2022 10:21:56 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

This comes as no surprise, but is sad and maddening all at the same time.

As a homeschooler, I would hope that regardless of their new milestone dates, that MANY parents have EXCEEDED them.


16 posted on 02/19/2022 10:39:09 AM PST by Whatever Works
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Nice


17 posted on 02/19/2022 11:11:42 AM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

They are, however, accepting Ebonics and Gangsta as language proficiency because, equity (and science).


18 posted on 02/19/2022 11:22:36 AM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

The Left continues to sacrifice kids to achieve their goal of total control.


19 posted on 02/19/2022 11:22:58 AM PST by antidemoncrat (somRead more at: https://economicti Astronomers see white dwarf 'switch on and off' for first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Do the Democrats think that there will be more “equity” by lowering the average IQ in the United States to that of Third World countries? If so, they are evil. In addition, kids with right thinking parents will just make more and more progress compared to those that acquiesce to the mask wearing etc.


20 posted on 02/19/2022 11:41:11 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson