Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Breyer Forced Out by the Left
https://patriotpost.us ^ | January 28, 2022 | DOUGLAS ANDREWS

Posted on 01/28/2022 12:08:35 PM PST by Red Badger

Still stinging from their loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat, Democrats aren’t about to let it happen again.

Eighty-three-year-old Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, a Bill Clinton appointee, is being forcibly retired by bloodthirsty partisans after nearly 28 years on the High Court. The timing is odd, though, in that Breyer doesn’t plan to step down until early summer, at the end of the current term. The lack of an official announcement yesterday from the Court itself is remarkable, and it tells us a great deal — namely, that Breyer himself wasn’t ready to make the announcement.

In a faux show of solidarity, Breyer will attend Joe Biden’s remarks on his retirement at 12:30 this afternoon. But make no mistake: He’s being put out to pasture; he’s being kicked to the curb and replaced by an as-yet unnamed black woman. So it goes in the race-obsessed world of the Left.

How do we know Breyer’s replacement will be a black woman? Because Joe Biden promised as much on the campaign trail, and because White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed it yesterday: “The president has stated and reiterated his commitment to nominating a black woman to the Supreme Court and certainly stands by that.”

Moreover, Biden will choose the next Supreme Court justice based on skin color and female chromosomes because that’s what he and his fellow Democrats have been reduced to: buying votes by doling out identity-based favors. Frankly, we wonder how Biden’s obsession with racial preferences has been working out — especially his promise to choose a Jamaican Indian an “African American” woman as his vice president.

On that note, there’s been speculation that this is Biden’s big chance to dump the aforementioned Kamala Harris by nominating her to the High Court. Nope. While Biden would indeed love to dump the woefully unpopular Cackler, he wouldn’t dare do so in this manner. After all, he promised to appoint a black woman, not a deeply unlikable, dimwitted Jamaican Indian who isn’t even popular among American blacks. Aside from those optics, Harris failed to pass the California Bar Exam and, er, well, let’s just say she might not have earned every position she held. A nominee as brazenly unqualified as Harris, then, wouldn’t pass the judicial giggle test. So unless Biden is aiming for a three-fer — a nominee who is at once black, Indian, and idiotic — Biden won’t be offloading his veep to the High Court.

The odds-on favorite to fill Breyer’s seat is probably Ketanji Brown Jackson. She currently sits on highly influential DC Circuit Court of Appeals, having been placed there by Biden to fill the seat vacated by former Obama Supreme Court nominee and current awful Attorney General Merrick Garland. Jackson, who once clerked for Breyer, is just 51, so she also checks the all-important “age” box. As for a dark horse candidate, that’d be J. Michelle Childs. She too was appointed to the DC Circuit by Biden, and, at 55, also has plenty of years ahead of her. But here’s the kicker: Childs is from South Carolina, and she’s the favorite of another South Carolinian, House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, whose crucial endorsement of Biden just before the do-or-die South Carolina primary pulled tired old Scranton Joe out of the dumpster and set him on the course to the Democrat nomination. Indeed, it’s not a stretch to say that without Clyburn’s help, Joe Biden wouldn’t be president today.

Regardless of whom Biden nominates, though, just remember: You were sexually assaulted by her 25 years ago. Yeah, yeah, we know you can’t remember much in the way of specific details, and we know you can’t produce any corroborating witnesses, but, still, it happened. (Hey, turnabout is fair play, right?)

As for the angry leftists who forced Breyer out, it’s hard to blame them. To this day, they’re still cursing the once hallowed name of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who overstayed her welcome on the bench and thereby allowed Donald Trump to replace her with a constitutional conservative, 49-year-old Amy Coney Barrett. She turns 50 tomorrow and, much to the Left’s chagrin, her votes and opinions will likely grace the High Court until 2050 or so.

The Democrats can’t let that happen again — not with The Great Shellacking on the horizon, not with Republicans poised to retake majorities in the House and, crucially, the justice-confirming Senate in November’s midterms.

When Breyer was confirmed in 1994, all but nine Republicans voted for him. Clinton’s other appointee, Ginsburg, got all but three Republican votes. Those days, it’s safe to say, are gone forever — or at least for the foreseeable future.

Years ago, knowing that their leftist policies rarely enjoyed popular support and could rarely withstand constitutional challenges, Democrats began vesting our nation’s third co-equal branch of government, the judicial branch, with ever-increasing power. And now both sides see judicial nominations — and particularly Supreme Court nominations — as a blood sport.

One final thought: Could Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell somehow derail this nomination? It’s unlikely, but this is a 50-50 Senate, and a backroom power-sharing deal he made with Chuck Schumer could possibly come back to haunt the Senate majority leader — perhaps long enough to make him the Senate minority leader once again. It’s unlikely, sure, but it’s fun to imagine hard-left heads exploding once again.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: conspiracies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2022 12:08:35 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

He should share his common experiences with Pope Benedict.


2 posted on 01/28/2022 12:11:20 PM PST by fwdude (My pronouns are "Let's, Go, and Brandon." Use them when addressing me or else. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Guess they want a more lefty type that can subvert the constitution for decades in to the future. Could be the constitution may not last that long.


3 posted on 01/28/2022 12:13:14 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is there like maybe some evidence that he is being “forced out”? Anything more than rumors? You know, actual evidence?


4 posted on 01/28/2022 12:13:43 PM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They have to pressure him out because they could not possibly deny Sleepy Joe his chance to appoint a justice and they don’t want this to drag out a year or more.


5 posted on 01/28/2022 12:14:32 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson


6 posted on 01/28/2022 12:14:48 PM PST by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

While they can badger him, I don’t see how they can force him out.

Also, 83 is way past the normal retirement age.


7 posted on 01/28/2022 12:16:50 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Stephen Breyer knows the Senate could become Republican and that to keep his seat leftist he needs to retire within months.


8 posted on 01/28/2022 12:17:34 PM PST by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

is being

forcibly retired

by bloodthirsty partisans after nearly 28 years on the High Court.

/

Who forced him ?

Who has authority to make anyone retire from the Supreme Court ?

Is that even legeal ?

Is he being threatened ?

Who forced him ? !!!

They kept Ruth’s corpse on the bench till they couldn’t hide the decomposition stench anymore , but he’s got to go ?

WHO is FORCEING him ?


9 posted on 01/28/2022 12:18:17 PM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

One piece of evidence, though hearsay, is that usually Supreme Court justices announce a retirement at the end of the Court year, late June/early July time frame. The Supreme Court itself usually makes an announcement of a retirement.

This one appears to have been leaked to the media in January, in the middle of the court’s year. While he may have made up his mind, normally the official announcement would not have been made at this time.


10 posted on 01/28/2022 12:20:14 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Young, radical, black female (birthing person) wanted. Others need not apply.


11 posted on 01/28/2022 12:21:06 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Ginsburg was different, because she was trying to outlast the term of office of Trump, so that Trump wouldn’t nominate a replacement for her. She chose to hang on in hopes the Nov. 2020 election would result in Biden being elected. But, she died ahead of schedule.


12 posted on 01/28/2022 12:21:33 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Eighty-three-year-old Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, a Bill Clinton appointee, is being forcibly retired by bloodthirsty partisans criminal Democrats after nearly 28 years on the High Court."

Fixed it.

13 posted on 01/28/2022 12:22:17 PM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. Never be a peaceful slave in a new socialist America.o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

.


14 posted on 01/28/2022 12:24:11 PM PST by sauropod (Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That’s one heck of a long stretch to turn that into a threat. Light years long.

Bloggers will blog and post anything to try to get more clicks.


15 posted on 01/28/2022 12:24:34 PM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No matter who Biden picks, it will always be considered an Affirmative Action hire- not based on abilities. In the long run it doesn’t really matter, because all votes on the court are counted equal. But everyone knows why she’s there.


16 posted on 01/28/2022 12:27:36 PM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

It will be Stacy Abrams sister.........................YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST..............


17 posted on 01/28/2022 12:28:31 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They can’t force him out. He has a lifetime appointment. He should tell them to pound sand. I would.


18 posted on 01/28/2022 12:28:53 PM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; All

The Rats want to keep the issue of a new SC Justice as far as possible from the midterms.


19 posted on 01/28/2022 12:29:25 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Ginsburg was different,

because she was trying to outlast the term of office of Trump, so that Trump wouldn’t nominate a replacement for her. She chose to hang on in hopes the Nov. 2020 election would result in Biden being elected. But, she died ahead of schedule.

/\

I can’t follow your reasoning. Ruth was different in that she wasn’t forced to retire.

The rest of your post I already knew, and didn’t answer any of my questions.

Who FORCED the retirement ?
Is that even legal ?

Choosing to retire is one thing, this being forced is another thing altogether.

If he’s choosing to retire to help the district of cartels political position then good rink riddance.


20 posted on 01/28/2022 12:31:34 PM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson