Posted on 01/23/2022 11:50:41 AM PST by ProfessorGoldiloxx
"If you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes....
For regular American Thinker readers, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Roughly two weeks ago, Jay Valentine wrote about the extent of fraud he and his team have discovered as they’ve uploaded voter rolls (which often had corrupted data that seemed deliberately intended to keep information opaque) into Valentine’s system. Once the information for any given state was loaded and sorted, it invariably revealed rather surprising information in both red and blue states. Among other things, in one red state, there were “4,300 people over 100 years old on their rolls. Some were 121. Those were the kids. The really old ones were almost 2,000 years old, and there were a bunch of them – and they voted.” ..."
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
This should not be surprising to anyone.
The only good democrat is a dead one that doesn’t vote after they’re dead.
And they are going to vote again this year..
There’s no fraud in US elections, the Ministry of Propaganda told me so...../s
I’ve been saying all along this has been a conspiracy of states against Trump. Thanks you idiots.
No registration date = birth date + 18 years = 1/1/1918
Thanks for the explanation - that explains part of it; but I’m still suspicious
A conspiracy of BOTH parties against Trump.
The Big Steal was completely BIPARTISAN.
He was a threat to their plan to steal the country from the citizens by flooding it with foreigners.
The January 1 is a pretty significant tell.
Oh well why not. Let us not discriminate against the dead. /s
“No birth date = 1/1/1900
No registration date = birth date + 18 years = 1/1/1918”
If the birth date or registration date were missing...wouldn’t that mean it’s an ineligible vote?
“Don’t get caught into arguing HOW the data is erroneous. That’s a straw man.”
As long as they’re on the voter rolls, the mail-in ballots go out and, literally, ANYONE who gets them can fill them out and return them.
“If the birth date or registration date were missing...wouldn’t that mean it’s an ineligible vote?”
It SHOULD be an ineligible vote. But if they’re in the database of registered voters, those votes WILL be counted.
It should be simple and required by law to remove someone from the voter rolls after they are deceased. I’ve been part of a project for a different use case in my careeer, but it involved flagging customers who fit a certain profile.
You can do the same thing with deceased people. It can be done monthly, but it’s not that hard and should be something that governments are forced to do.
Of course any democrat controlled government will cry racism and voter rights over just making sure dead people don’t vote.
“showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918”
“Well, you see that 01/01/1918 date is just a placeholder that they use when they don’t have the actual DOB readily available.”
^^^^ What you’d hear from a lib if you confronted them with this data. (They’d think this perfectly fine, and that there is no need to do anything about it, or to think it “odd” that a government DB wouldn’t have such a basic bit of voter info.
I’d bet a lot of them will have died by the next election.
I'm not sure about currently, but I'm almost 100% sure the recently failed Democrat "Voting Rights" bill did.
Why not? As long as they vote Democrat, they have as much right as anyone to vote.
Searched on ‘124’ and nothing came up. Should have though, huh.
The date issue is an artifact of the consolidation of the states county based voters lists (that used a variety of standards and protocols) into a single cohesive list administered by the state instead. Some data did not transfer properly, hence a “default” registration date.
Nothing nefarious or criminal about it.
This is the third posting (at least that I have seen) of this article in the last two days, so that’s why it’s “The ugly recurring trolling thread.”
The first posting I saw of the thread actually had a concise explanation of why the date issue came up, my earlier post here is what little I remember of that clear description of the causes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.