There are NO approved shots available.
They are mandating that you get an experimental substance injected.
This is against the Nuremberg Code.
I’m curious about something.
Do you know by chance which group of elected U.S. Representatives and Senators voted on and approved the Nuremberg Code to make it binding in the United States? Do you by chance have a link to the roll call vote on that?
Can you also cite to the place in the U.S. Code where the Nuremberg can be found?
I’d appreciate that information.
Thanks.
When I think of Nuremberg, I think of those mandated one-time trips to the shower.
To begin with, people have probably been getting mixed, disturbing messages about alleged problems with experimental CV19 mRNA jabs. So people are understandably taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting jabbed, especially where harassment for not getting a jab is concerned.
Study Reveals That Unjabbed Are Better Informed Than Jabbed (12.27.21)
The Nuremberg Code, ‘Informed Consent’ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)
Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)
Next, the EUA law, probably unconstitutional imo, mandates, in part (II), that we should have been officially informed about things like possible spike protein problems and other alleged concerns before getting jab, due process counseling arguably ignored by many pro-vax talking heads.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (excerpted)
"(e) Conditions of authorization(1) Unapproved product(A) Required conditions(i)...(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."
Also, note that part (III) of EUA requires that people be informed of other possible remedies before choosing whether or not to get jab.
Finally, as a consequence of what is seemingly growing evidence of poorly planned, poorly executed, alleged vote counting fraud by Democrats to steal 2020 elections, Democrats had arguably destroyed their credibility concerning election before they took over management of government-promoted jabs, foolishly bullying everybody to get jabbed. So a growing number of people understandably aren't “buying” what Democrats are trying to “sell” them concerning election or jabs imo.
Corrections, insights welcome.
It’s also against US Federal law. Hear any repubs speaking out about it ? Nope, not one.