[TexasGurl24]

I’m curious about something.

Do you know by chance which group of elected U.S. Representatives and Senators voted on and approved the Nuremberg Code to make it binding in the United States? Do you by chance have a link to the roll call vote on that?

Can you also cite to the place in the U.S. Code where the Nuremberg can be found?

I’d appreciate that information.

Thanks.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

--- "Do you know by chance which group of elected U.S. Representatives and Senators voted on and approved the Nuremberg Code to make it binding in the United States?"

Equally fine question to ask about the climate change treaties? Or the sustainable development treaties? Or the quasi-open borders treaties? Or the "policeman" to the world treaties? Or the Pfizer and Moderna secrecy agreements?

[Lurkinanloomin]

It’s internationally recognized that subjects of medical experiments must give informed consent.

[Carry me back]

It is federal law. They can’t be forced on anyone and no one can lose their job. Not one Republican has tried to bring it up and stop it.

[zeugma]

# Can you also cite to the place in the U.S. Code where the Nuremberg can be found?
This is something I would like to know as well.

I do not think it was ever actually voted on as a treaty, nor was it ever incorporated into the U.S. Code. I’d be happy for someone with more information who might correct me on this.

Personally, I think most o the comments about the Nuremburg code are statements of morality(which I agree with BTW), but they are not actual statements regarding law.

I was thinking about this the other day and came to a rather surprising (to me) conclusion that if it is a fact of law that those executed after WWII were executed because they violated this ‘code’, they were actually executed via a bill of attainder.