Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Student debt forgiveness should be funded by fraudulent colleges that sold worthless degrees, instead of by innocent taxpayers
wordpress ^ | January 17, 2022 | Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

Posted on 01/17/2022 12:43:02 PM PST by grundle

Democrats think that innocent taxpayers should be forced to pay off student debt.

I think this is a horrible idea.

I’m a Libertarian, which means that I am against punishing innocent taxpayers.

It also means that I, unlike Democrats, understand the horrible incentives that would be created if innocent taxpayers were forced to pay off student debt. Such a policy would encourage colleges to raise their tuitions even more than they already have, and would also encourage future students to borrow even more money than what had been borrowed by past students. This would make the problem of student debt worse, not better.

By comparison, my proposal would not do these harmful things. On the contrary, my proposal would cause colleges to think very hard before they encourage their students and potential students to borrow money. It would also encourage colleges to reconsider their current policy of offering worthless majors that cause their graduates to end up working at Starbucks.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Reily

My kid has a loan for a doctoral program which should eventually set him up in a nice practice. But at 7% interest it’ll take him forever to pay the loan back. Especially if he and his wife want to buy a home and start a family before they’re 40.

The bad guys here are the universities & banks.


21 posted on 01/17/2022 1:15:03 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Democrats think that innocent taxpayers should be forced to pay off student debt.

I agree with Democrats about that. But I wouldn't call taxpayers "innocent." Taxpayers are guilty of earning income. The innocent ones are the students who accumulate debt. Say an innocent student goes to an expensive college for four years, cuts class all the time, and gets the bare-minimum GPA required for graduation with a basket-weaving degree. I say the guilty taxpayers should fully pay that innocent student's full tuition. After all, basket-weaving is a tough line of business.

/s

22 posted on 01/17/2022 1:15:07 PM PST by gw-ington (Democrat policies are obviously weakening America, so vote conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

One the one hand, if you have been too lazy to look at the job and salary prospects for some college degree you intend to pursue, and from that have no idea how or when you can pay back the sums you borrowed to pay your extravagant college for its extravagant degree, then YOU are still the one most responsible for your education debt.

On the other hand, it is clear that those to whom the largest boon is given by government supported student loans and grants is the continually extravagant colleges. It is also clear that the constant push for greater government backing for all that has encouraged the colleges to go ahead and be wasteful and extravagant, the political class is going to get the taxpayers to cover it.

Therefor, unless there is (a) vast reductions in government assistance for college tuition, and (b) some accountability on the part of colleges for the useful prospects of the degrees they hand out, then (1) college tuition will continue to rise faster than inflation, which it has for decades and (2) the student debt crisis will be a permanent unresolved issue with (3) current “remedies” - more government aid - repeated as the “solution”.


23 posted on 01/17/2022 1:16:09 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

It’s similar to the Planned Parenthood rat laundromat. Student loans for being sent to government indoctrination centers result in students being rat voters and teachers being rat contributors to keep it all going.

Why do colleges with billions in endowments need to charge so much? I suppose if they didn’t they’d lose “prestige” (not to mention even more money).


24 posted on 01/17/2022 1:17:15 PM PST by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Student debt forgiveness should be funded by...those who borrowed the money. When they repay their debt, their loan is forgiven. Pretty simple concept, yes? Works every time it is used.


25 posted on 01/17/2022 1:17:25 PM PST by Tudorfly (All things are possible within the will of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

In a more ideal world, any college with an endowment above a certain number, let’s say one billion dollars, has their endowment taxed at 50% with all proceeds going to a central fund for repaying tuition debt.


26 posted on 01/17/2022 1:24:21 PM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Get the government out of the student loan business.

This is exactly the problem. First of all, the U.S. government has already spent the money. Government bureaucrats have used these loans, especially defaulted loans, to justify large budgets to recover the money. How much taxpayer money is being spent to try to collect money from people who are unable to repay? I've long thought that the trade off for writing off this debt is to abolish the U.S. Dept. of Ed. and stop all future loans. The result is that many expensive universities would fold up when the easy money stopped. Since the people employed at such places tend to be leftists, this would be a good thing for all. Using expensive education as a way to keep people out of the job market and unproductive, has always been a bad idea.
27 posted on 01/17/2022 1:27:46 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grundle

University of Michigan president is fired from *****$927,000-*****a-year job

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4030235/posts


28 posted on 01/17/2022 1:29:27 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Why student debt forgiveness at all? Crazy inflation is shrinking their debt month by month and yes, they should meet their obligations.

We need to go back to adults being adults.


29 posted on 01/17/2022 1:32:29 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jz638

Why? What’s special about student debt?

Should the responsible schlubs who go married, started families, and bought a house instead pay both their mortgage and the irresponsibles’ “student debt”?


30 posted on 01/17/2022 1:34:11 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I agree re: a real college education not being a jobs program.

But I don’t think you’re in touch with modern higher ed if you don’t think many college programs are at least close to worthless and, given the indoctrination, often worse.


31 posted on 01/17/2022 1:35:31 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Why ever should it take massive giveaways to the irresponsible as a “trade off” to get the federal government out of something they should never have been involved with at all?


32 posted on 01/17/2022 1:36:36 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Some may just be clueless about the whole situation.

Some? More like damn near all of them.

While I love this proposal, I don't think it is politically saleable. What I think might be would be something like the following:

  1. Taxpayers suck up 25%. In return, the government gets gets out of the student loan business completely and permanently, selling off the loan portfolios within two years.
  2. Lenders acquiring loans have two ways to collect:
  3. Originating institution of higher learning is stuck with collecting the remaining 75%. If they have sold a worthwhile degree, this should NOT be a problem by explaining to the student that they have a choice of getting a repayment plan set up or getting their transcripts withheld or degree suspended.
  4. If, however, the degree they sold is worthless, then the student can give the lender the middle finger and they can go after the institution as a secondary borrower.

    Yeah, there will be a lot of screaming and shouting, but the pain gets spread around. And best of all, the government beast is dead; meaning new lenders can make rates based on the marketability of the degree or even make small loans to someone going to trade school to learn welding or cosmetology.


33 posted on 01/17/2022 1:37:47 PM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FLNittany

Because that is gimmicky grandstanding.

With the exception of a few professional programs at a level that the private sector is willing to underwrite loans, we need to get college back to a pay-as-you-go plan except for the gifted students who earn scholarships.


34 posted on 01/17/2022 1:37:57 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Have the colleges co-sign the loans, with them taking the hit if the student can’t pay.

Suddenly colleges would stop offering worthless majors and accepting unqualified students.


35 posted on 01/17/2022 1:38:55 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Agree with all you said.


36 posted on 01/17/2022 1:40:15 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: throwthebumsout

Everyone posting on this thread should keep in mind that government-backed student loans are not intended to help the students. They are designed to subsidize the schools.


37 posted on 01/17/2022 1:43:38 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

“She was 19, had signed up to go to online classes at Phoenix College, got a student loan for about 20k...”

A very common tale regarding Phoenix and colleges like it.


38 posted on 01/17/2022 1:44:21 PM PST by moehoward (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Something sounds wrong with that story. A black female would have been at the top of the list for almost any scholarship or financial aid program in any university. Why the heck was she borrowing money to go to an online school?


39 posted on 01/17/2022 1:45:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Have the colleges co-sign the loans, with them taking the hit if the student can’t pay.

Suddenly colleges would stop offering worthless majors and accepting unqualified students.

That's a great idea.

40 posted on 01/17/2022 1:45:58 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson