Posted on 12/29/2021 11:23:11 AM PST by Mount Athos
So we know how it went, from “getting a vaccine means Covid stops with you”, down to “it protects you from getting sick”, down to “it mostly protects you from getting hospitalized”.
Well, the new data from the UK says: the “vax” does not reduce your chances of hospitalization at all.
Look at Page 2 of UK Daily Omicron report (to be soon discontinued due to Delta dying out).
The UK has 23% of vaccine-free persons. And of Omicron hospitalized, only 26% of persons are vax-free. In addition, Omicron has mostly been infecting younger persons as it did not spread to the older population as much. This will happen, of course, but as of now Omicron cases are mostly younger persons 20-49 years of age, who like to party and shop.
Their vaccination rate is around 60-70% (see page 21).
So we get: about 30-35% vaccine-free persons get about 26% hospitalizations for Omicron.
This means that the vaccine does ZIP for them: nada, nothing. It is possible that by breaking the data further you can find a small slice of people, such as the “boosted, but past 14 days, older persons who are less than 10 weeks away from booster” who get hospitalized less due to the short term effect of the booster. I wrote several articles about that. But the protection from boosters wanes very rapidly.
About 26% of those hospitalized with Omicron are Vaccine Free.
I guess another booster shot is coming. That should work/s.
bttt
Should say "un-jabbed" or "jab-free". The jabs should not be called "vaccines" since they do not meat the traditional definition. The recent change in the definition of "vaccine" to cover them is obviously a disingenuous move to fool people who do not pay close attention. It is playing into dishonesty to adopt term "vaccine" when describing the jabs.
Why are people in the hospital? If they are in BECAUSE of covid then this would suggest the vaccines do nothing. But if they are in for other things (broken bone, surgery, etc) and tested positive for COVID while in there then it suggests that hospital populations are representative of the vaccination rate (i.e. it's equally likely both vax and unvax people can get COVID) but says nothing about comparative severity.
It still protects you from the low opinion of your betters.
Another way that the government/media complex is lying to us is by using the expression “ EUA authorization”. Most people do not know that EUA means emergency use authorization. They just see the word “authorization” and figure that the FDA has given the full go-ahead to these so-called vaccines.
Given the "rigor" this guy applied to his analysis it says nothing about nothing.
Ka Ching!
What?! 23% of all vaccine-free people in the world reside in the U.K.?!
This article needs copy-editing!
Regards,
that’s my comment, not the article
Hiw about pure blood or non GMO?
good point i will try to follow this
Really not a good ratio.
Hints into nightmare kitty
It's spreading among younger people because the young are the most cavalier and indifferent to masking and distancing. They drink and party in bars and clubs and spread the virus around.
The person who wrote this apparently thinks that made sense.
I’ll translate if it didn’t make sense.
The unvaccinated are only slightly overrepresented among hospitalizations. This goes against the narrative that it is overwhelmingly the unvaccinated.
The vax might not be working very well against omicron
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.