Posted on 12/14/2021 1:40:36 PM PST by Hojczyk
Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down with “Meta” CEO Mark Zuckerberg and finally said out loud what many people have been warning for over a year about the rushed mRNA vaccines: They may actually make the Covid pandemic worse.
Dr. Fauci was commenting on a recent study that showed that the Covid vaccines may actually make a recipient more likely to be reinfected than someone with natural immunity from a prior infection.
“This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse,” Fauci said. “There was the history of the Respiratory Syncitial Virus vaccine in children, which paradoxically made the children worse.”
Pause and read that again. Now consider all of the announcements made by “public health experts” that promised the “vaccines” were “100% safe and effective,” even for children who are at nearly zero risk.
Dr. Fauci wasn’t done yet, though. He went on to state another example that he was directly involved with where a treatment made individuals worse.
“One of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected,” Fauci added.
The RSV vaccine’s failure was exposed in 2008 by researchers who finally untangled the decades-old mystery.
It should be noted that in 2019, the NIH admitted that “we are still lacking a safe and effective RSV vaccine.” But it somehow developed a “safe and effective” Covid-19 vaccine in a matter of months?
As noted before, the American public has no way of knowing if the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was rigorously tested, because the FDA refuses to fully release the documents for 75 years. A “whistleblower” on the inside of Pfizer’s clinical trials has documented many alleged serious issues, including “falsifying data.”
(Excerpt) Read more at trendingpolitics.com ...
Will they react with enough anger to cause a Revolution? Or will they just meekly accept it because they now have no choice?
Or will they angrily seek out the “lucky” unvaxxed because they are not afflicted as they are?
Personally, I think the first scenario is the LEAST likely one.
What the heck is his actual job anyway? And who is his boss?
———-
Klaus Schwab and the orher psychopaths, techno tyrants and other good ole boys at the Great Reset club? With many puppet strings also pulled by the likes of Pfizer gansta Andrew Bourla ( who calls US the criminals)
Lock him up.
So the shovel ready shots weren’t shovel ready, after all. Hmmmm.
Shouldn’t this be censored from the internet as misinformation?
They will have to throw him under the bus to protect Dems. “Biden trusted him.”
I think we figured that out over a year ago. He says one thing one day, another thing the next. He’s so back and forth and attempts to weasel his way out of it all.
Only people who believe him are those who swear by the shots and politicians.
Little 💩.
As Fauci is a career civil servant, the President cannot "fire him" in the sense of terminating his federal employment without a showing of cause. At the same time, the President can remove Fauci from his position as Director of NIAID. Fauci would still have to be paid, but he need not have any position of authority or control over any aspect of NIH operations. He could, in effect, be assigned to sit in a metaphorical broom closet, with no one reporting or answering to him.
Trump could have, and should have, done that on Day One.
Can some organization not sue the FDA under FICA?
Some other petty functionary with big idea would have taken his place.
I knew a GS-15 once that they wanted to get rid of, but couldn’t fire because of civil service protection.
He was stripped of all responsibilities, given a windowless office with a computer, a printer, and only an application on the PC to fill out SF-171s.
Fauci caught ducking, dodging and dancing once again. What a surprise.
How pathetic can this charade get!
Every vaccine, every drug therapy in general, every single one is "contra indicated" for some people. How many, who, why, how serious it is varies. But there are always people for whom a treatment is fatal.
With a plan to push experimental vaccines onto 300 million or more people, even a 0.03% fatality rate meant they were going to kill over 100,000 people. Not quite enough to crack the top 5 Nazi extermination camp records, but it beats out #6. Or for more perspective, that's about the combined total of initial deaths at Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. Yes, your FDA, and people cheered.
They still do not have any idea who should not get the vaccines. The only "no" they'll grudgingly go along with is if someone is "allergic" to one or more of the components. Makes it sound so minimal, so safe. They are not.
But they have themselves a beautiful system here. Near-term issues are simply recorded as "unvaccinated" or "not fully vaccinated" hospitalizations and deaths. That is the real reason for the 2 week buffer to be "fully" vaccinated. Any complications crop up later, they are "rare" and "unexpected."
I can’t t believe he keeps his job.
It's become pretty obvious, they've done everything possible to get rid of Trump except assassinate him.
FauciDingDong apparently just said a quiet part out loud.
Coronavirus PING!
FauXi said that about gain of function research not vaccines. You would know that if you had simply followed the conversation you were replying to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.