Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kenosha Marshal Reveals Why Two Jurors are Hesitant to Come Forward with Rittenhouse Verdict: They are Afraid of ‘Backlash’
Trendng Politics ^ | 16 Nov 21 | Kyle Becker

Posted on 11/16/2021 5:21:26 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Major update: The judge in the Rittenhouse case has just informed the media, “I think the jury is going to retire for the evening.”

The twelve jurors in the Kyle Rittenhouse case are in deliberations after a tense court trial that has national ramifications. The prosecution has botched a weak case that alleges Rittenhouse is guilty of killing two men and injuring a third man during a Black Lives Matter riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin in August 2020. Rittenhouse’s defense maintains he acted in self-defense.

Although all of Rittenhouse’s victims were white,all of them had serious criminal records, and they were caught on high-definition video openly chasing and attacking the boy, who was seventeen years old at the time, the U.S. media has once again turned a clear case of self-defense into a racially politicized circus.

The Kenosho Sheriff even released a statement ahead of the Rittenhouse verdict, which was expected to be delivered today or tomorrow.

“The Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department and Kenosha Police Department understand and recognize the anxiety surrounding the Kyle Rittenhouse trial,” the statement says. “There are many questions being asked from our community as well as media outlets.”

“Our departments have worked together and made coordinated efforts over the last year to improve response capabilities to large scale events,” the statement added ominously. “We have strengtheneed our existing relationships with State and Federal resources.”

(Excerpt) Read more at trendingpolitics.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; corporatemedia; corruptiedia; didyousearch; didyoutroll; enemedia; fidorkus; jurorintimidation; jury; kenosha; kylerittenhouse; mediabias; rittenhouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

You can’t coexist with people who are willing to loot, burn, destroy, and even kill any time they don’t get their way. Period.


21 posted on 11/16/2021 5:43:23 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Patient bill of rights .
Sue Tenet the Woke For Profit .
This is a lefty health care company now !


22 posted on 11/16/2021 5:43:39 PM PST by ncalburt (they Gop DC Globalists are the evil )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

Regardless there will be a riot soon, Ben Crump hasn’t had a settlement check for awhile


23 posted on 11/16/2021 5:43:42 PM PST by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

If that’s the case these jurors are disqualified. They are allowing non trial, outside forces to influence them. Bring the first two alternates.


24 posted on 11/16/2021 5:43:50 PM PST by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
 
 
Saw video of the courthouse earlier today, about half a dozen Antifa-looking sad sacks lurking out front. Not much of a turn out.
 
 

25 posted on 11/16/2021 5:44:02 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy

Not ALL peaceful ... “mostly peaceful” ... This expression was repeated by the propaganda media so many times that those who watch only them believed it. “Mostly peaceful” turned out to be one of the most creative but dishonest terms ever devised. No matter what pictures came out showing murder, mahem, arson, etc., they claimed that was just the rare exception to the “mostly peaceful” protesters.


26 posted on 11/16/2021 5:44:19 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Mob Rule Verdict


27 posted on 11/16/2021 5:44:33 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

Exactly.


28 posted on 11/16/2021 5:45:12 PM PST by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Agreed. I’m surprised it hasn’t been done yet.


29 posted on 11/16/2021 5:45:26 PM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

BLMlash?


30 posted on 11/16/2021 5:49:30 PM PST by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
"This case is a big deal and if he’s found guilty which I don’t think he will, it will be just another step towards outlawing self defense."

And there you have the REASON for this FALSE FLAG! To OUTLAW DEFENDING ONESELF FROM ANTIFA/BLM/ETC..

WHY DO YOU THINK THE FBI HAD DRONES OVERHEAD? IT OBVIOUSLY WASN'T FOR THE PURPOSE OF CATCHING THE BAD GUYS.. IT WAS SO THE FBI COULD DIRECT ANTIFA/BLM ON THE GROUND and entice a GOOD SAMARITAN TO REACT WITH FORCE.. AND THE FBI GOT IT ALL ON VIDEO. And NOW the MEDIA is busy doing all they can to get a good Samaritan thrown in prison. Grosskreutz had his charges DROPPED. Notice the FIB OPERATIVES either NEVER get charged, or they GET THEIR CHARGES DROPPED. OH YEAH, AND WHERE'S RAY EPPS? OR JOHN SULLIVAN?

WAKE UP, FReepers. IT'S WORSE THAN YOU THINK.

31 posted on 11/16/2021 5:49:54 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my b"ack for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

32 posted on 11/16/2021 5:50:21 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Alec Baldwin has killed more people than the Jan 6 protesters. And he will serve less jail time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Sure. Any news reports on the feds being on hand? No. If a US Marshal happened to be in the building, and I’d suggest that is a relatively rare occurrence in a state courthouse, how would he become privy to what would be tightly held info. Info that even the bailiff in charge of the jury should not be privy to. The answer is he wouldn’t. The article specifically says a US Marshal and I’m sticking by my BS call


33 posted on 11/16/2021 5:51:00 PM PST by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas

Or maybe ‘marital’.


34 posted on 11/16/2021 5:51:54 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I stand corrected. That’s pretty cool.


35 posted on 11/16/2021 5:51:56 PM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

“how would he become privy to what would be tightly held info”

Who knows? Go ask Posobiec. Maybe he overheard it in the bathroom.

All I said is there are plenty of valid reasons for a US Marshal to be in a state courthouse, because there are. I’m not here to argue anything with you.


36 posted on 11/16/2021 5:52:52 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cyn

Great comments on this thread.

“Your surprise is waiting”


37 posted on 11/16/2021 5:53:08 PM PST by Ezekiel ("Come fly with US". Ingenuity-- because the Son of David begins with Mars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

who do they think they are... the SCOTUS???


38 posted on 11/16/2021 5:58:48 PM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Agreed. I’ve tried several high profile jury trials, and only saw a hint somewhat like this only once - and it proved to be incorrect.


39 posted on 11/16/2021 6:00:41 PM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

You mean like Gunsmoke’s Martial, er Marital, er no, Martian Dillon?


40 posted on 11/16/2021 6:01:17 PM PST by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson