Posted on 11/07/2021 7:22:28 PM PST by bitt
I discussed the Igor Danchenko indictment here, laying out some of the more eye-raising parts of the facts and charges against Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source.
Taking a closer look at the Danchenko indictment, there is a curious question presented by the FBI to Danchenko in June 2017. A question that indicates the FBI might have known more about the true sources to the Steele Dossiers sooner than they have let on.
FBI Questions about Danchenko source Charles Dolan
On June 15, 0217, the FBI interviewed Danchenko regarding the Dossiers (labeled “Company Reports” in the indictment). Here’s the line of questioning from the indictment:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F809ca7f4-fe27-4b99-800c-d4961e7ca263_706x593.png
These FBI questions – asking Danchenko specific questions about Dolan and his interactions with Dolan – are significant for a number of reasons:
It indicates the FBI had specific information linking Dolan to Danchenko. It is quite possible the FBI knew on June 15, 2017 that Dolan was a source for Danchenko.
The suspicion that Dolan was a source is explained by the FBI Agent stating that he thinks there are other Dossier sources, immediately followed by a question about Dolan.
If that is the case, then the FBI would have known that Danchenko lied about his communications with Dolan.
This information may have come from surveillance on Danchenko source Olga Galkina. As observed by Chuck Ross: “The IG report indicates that the FBI had Section 702 coverage on Galkina, which would have allowed the agency to surveil her communications.”
If the FBI had Section 702 coverage on Galkina, it would have swept-up the communications of Dolan and Danchenko - providing them with knowledge that a Hillary Clinton supporter was a source for the Dossiers.
Again, the dates are important. The Danchenko interview where he was questioned about Dolan took place on June 15, 2017, before the 4th FISA warrant on Carter Page, which was submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on June 29, 2017.
...MORE...
P
John Ratcliffe was on Sunday morning futures and said there is a lot more come. He said he knows this because he gave Durham over 1000 declassified documents and implied the public has only seen a few of them
They knew he was fake.
found the clip
John Ratcliffe: I gave Durham over 1000 other documents that the public hasn’t seen
Igor Danchenko
2006 caught (on surveillance) entering Russia embassy giving them files
2009 offered money for classified (Military) info to Obama officials
2009 - wanted info on latest Naval ships
After Danchenko tells FBi that Doisier is unreliable, they use it to get FISA warrants. Never saying he was a Russian Agent / asset or that he repudiated the Dossier.
.
We are just seeing the legal Kabuki surrounding the part of this process which is visible by necessity. It’s quite possible no ultimate outcomes are in doubt.
It’s quite possible Putin handed all these traitors to Trump when he became POTUS-elect in 2016. Out of professional courtesy.
If you think the current representation of an administration disproves the above, consider what other course of action could have inflicted as much damage on the bastards than what is happening now. Trump drove them bat poop crazy for four years and then “lost” the election last year. We know the election was a farce and the bastards are actually thin as Joe’s elderly skin, and their attempts to govern are destroying their brand FOREVER.
Because Trump is all about branding, and this is how you make your adversary die by branding.
Trust Durham! Two weeks!
.
Durham must be against raids, on principle.
The new narrative is the FBi was fooled.
.
Good break down
Makes a lotta sense
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.