Posted on 10/15/2021 10:59:55 AM PDT by Mount Athos
Virginia law requires public schools to report specifically named serious crimes.
Rape is obviously a serious crime on that list.
But the Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) has refused to report those. They have a clean record.
It is little wonder that they claimed they had "no reports" of sexual assaults in bathrooms. They have no reports of any sexual assaults -- it's their policy.
They've been covering up sexual assaults at least as early as 2018.
Luke Rosniak dug up a sexual assault that took place in the LCPS system in 2018. A boy was sexually violated by other boys, who inserted "objects" inside him.
Not reported! To protect the children, you understand.
You will not be shocked to discover that the entire media has joined in the cover-up.
And remember, the incident where an LGBT activist taunted the girl's father, claiming she was lying, is one of the key "incidents" the National School Board Association used to justify demanding DOJ and FBI targeting of parents.
The "targeting" of school boards the media all reported on. National news.
But the whole reason for the incident that largely started this? They refuse absolutely to report on.
The Washington Post, possibly worried that they had been caught not covering a story of obvious interest to Washington Post readers (more people reading the Post in northestern Virginia than in DC proper), now admits that there were two sexual assaults that took place in Loudoun schools -- but refuses to report that the school board tried to cover it up, or that it was a case of a "boy in a skirt" attacking a girl in a restroom.
Which is not a point made simply to denigrate trans people, but to prove what is obvious, that a woman is an extremely difficult situation when she's in an isolated area with a biological male -- which is why we had sex-segragated spaces from the beginnings of human civilization.
Not "gender" segregated. Biological sex-segregated.
But this would add nuance to a public controversy the Sexual Left wants to pretend has no nuance to it at all, so they forget to report that part.
Note that they refuse to say why this particular crime has a political, policy-oriented edge to it. Just a random boy r4ping a random girl, which was allegedly "mishandled."
If you want to know the details of that, why, you must be a Racist and a Domestic Terrorist.
But would the Washington Post even be allowed to report on the perp, even if they wanted to?
YouTube, a monopoly video posting site, and a child corporation of Google, a monopoly in the two key businesses of search and ad placement, has given Steven Crowder a "hard strike" -- the last warning before a complete ban -- for daring to mention the transgender part of the story.
They're taking the position that transgenders are never to be accused of sexual crimes, ever.
Even when the transgender nature of the perp is directly relevant to a major public issue involving schoolchildren's safety.
This monopoly has decided you're simply forbidden to mention the gender expression of any perp who isn't "cis" gender.
Straight white males? You can propagandize and propagandize how these little r4pists are constantly attacking young girls.
But put a skirt on that white male who has a normal heterosexual (he would say "homosexual" or "lesbian") attraction to girls...? Then his demographic traits are officially forbidden to be spoken.
So our Tech Overlords have decided that schoolgirls can be freely r4ped due to dangerous and misguided policies favored completely by the Tech Overlords, and you're simply not permitted to say that one helped cause the other.
Yes, it's that simple. The cause of transgenderism will be won by Tech Monopolists by deleting/censoring any evidence that it causes harm.
p
Evil plain and simple...and extreme cowardice
The mainstream enemedia are, by their own behavior, enemies of the United States of America.
Where is this? Florida?
Virginia
At the end of the day… a dude in a dress, is still a dude in a dress.
They are using public airways. This partisan censorship is grounds for terminating their licenses, IMO.
If it were my kid who was raped, the perpetrator had better hope for a long jail sentence because I’d hold a grudge - maybe even include members of the skool board in my displeasure.
Democrats protect rapists.
Luke Rosiak was on Bongino this morning and he said the principal was going to have a news conference today ...
This is a good opportunity to point out hypocrisy and double standards. If feminists are so passionate about rape and “rape culture”, then the left ought to be outraged over this, but they’re going to look the other way because the rapist chose to identify as female which makes them a protected member of the alphabet community. And because that he is now a repeat offender.
If I was the father that fag rapper
better watch over his shoulder 24/7
So why is the Biden administration providing cover for child rapists?
Same here. I really have to commend the Father of the victim for such self control. The School Board took advantage of this guy’s good nature with their disregard of the serious nature of the crime with their denials of any misconduct on campus.
Good thing the perp didn’t play lacrosse at Duke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.