What’s Going On? Arizona Recently Processed 673,000 Voter Identities with the Social Security Administration – 58% Had NO MATCH FOUND

GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 9/19/2021 | Jim Hoft

[bitt]

In the last 10 weeks, Arizona has checked the voter registration credentials with the Social Security Administration (SSA) on 673,560 applicants.

This is a massive volume considering most States including Arizona typically process around 2,500 a month. They’ve processed more identities in the last 2 months than they’ve done in the last 9 years combined. Is someone scrubbing a database, or auditing “Federal Only” voters?

During “new voter registration” States are to verify the driver’s license number against their own MVD database. Only in situations where no driver’s license can be provided should the State check their identity through the Help America Vote Verification (HAVV) interface provided by the SSA. The 43 States that participate provide the last 4 of the SS#, the applicant’s name, and DOB. The interface responds if a match was, or was not found, if they are deceased, and so on. This entire HAVV Excel dataset can be downloaded here from the SSA.

“No Match” was found on 58% of the voters submitted by Arizona over the last 10 weeks.

[simpson96]

“What difference, at this point, does it make?!”

-HRC

[LastDayz]

Now where’s them two brain cells to rub together? They were here just a minute ago.

[dragnet2]

Bookmark

[stylin19a]

yikes.

673,560 voters without a Driver’s License? seems like a lot. is that possible in this day and age?
I wonder how many registered online ? by mail ? in person, to vote?

[elpadre]

“...Who cares?”

me, and many millions more!

[lepton]

While the SS records are notoriously bad, this would be incredibly excessive.

[GOPJ]

Thanks Civ

[SunkenCiv]

My pleasure.

[Gritty]

The bigger question is-WHY have republicans DONE NOTHING to stop it???????

Ask Gov. Ducey, Kemp, SOS Raffensberger, Sen. McConnell, etc. and the list goes on and on. They are all OK with this as long as they get their piece of the pie - and nobody rats out their deep, dark secrets through which many have been compromised and blackmailed.

[roadcat]

Let me guess, the non-matches are all Democrats, and their first name is Jill or Hillary.

[Candor7]

Now that is a gigantic effing problem for the Dems in Arizona.

Now the FBI should be rolling the Arizona Dems up for election fraud and federal crimes.

But whaddaya hear? .....................Crickets.

[zek157]

Ray Charles could see that.

[AZLiberty]

More likely, the system returns a non-match when the data submitted for name and/or birth date (especially the name) doesn’t exactly match what’s on file in the SS database.

Arizona appears to have many more non-matches than other states. Do you think we are just worse spellers?

[upchuck]

Guess we’ll find out Friday, Sept 24, 2021 1pm local when the “Arizona Voter Audit” is finally released. Unless they push the date back again. Shades of Durham.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3995608/posts

[fuzzylogic]

Either known corruption keeping them in line or they have relationships that compromise their judgement. Just look at Mitch McConnell’s wife.

[SuperLuminal]

I seriously doubt that the same test in CA would result in closer to 80% not matched...

[Paleo Pete]

Huh? Say what?

YOU posted something sarcastic? Say it ain’t so...lol

I’m gonna see pigs fly any minute now...

No, I can’t type any of this with a straight face...

[ladyjane]

I’m guessing it started in the later 70’s building each election.

JFK. Chicago, Illinois, 1960.

[Hojczyk]

Elections have been rigged for years....why else would democrats control big cities for fifty years...

[firebrand]

Whatever is going on, looks like they’re winning.