It seems to be a compromise between the traditional vaccine and the mRNA franken jab but you still get the spike proteins but in a predictable dosage.
I would take the title “vaccine is safe and prevents COVID-19” with a grain of salt but it just comes with the URL.
I think this is the pill version, not jab
& not mRNA..
Someone correct me if wrong
PREVENTS? The others were touted to do that too initially. Maybe if Pedo Joe garran-damn-tees it safe and effective.......nah. Still not.
So they tested it for ten years to make sure there were no long-term side-effects?
And long term 5-10 year testing happened in a time warp?
So was thalidomide.
The Shadow of the Thalidomide Tragedy | Retro Report | The New York Times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41n3mDoVbvk
12 minutes and extremely fascinating and educational.
Noravax may hold some promise, but how will we ever be able to trust that's true?
The claim is that all these ‘vaccines’ that are killing people are labeled ‘safe’.
My wedding ring has thus far prevented me from attack by elephants. Well, except for my wife.
Seriously though, how does one prove that the subject of a vaccine has also been the subject of an attempted virus invasion?
This should be the hypo version.
āā¦show that the investigational vaccine known as NVX-CoV2373 demonstrated 90.4% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 disease. The candidate showed 100% protection against moderate and severe diseaseā¦ā
*********************************************************************
Note that, just as for Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, they are NOT SAYING THAT THE VACCINATED CAN NEVER BE INFECTED. If you are vaccinated against a pathogen and later are exposed to that pathogen and then tested, you can test positive. If the only thing present in the test sample are fragments of dead viruses killed by your immune system, you will test positive.
My understanding is this is much more like a flu shot and is technology that has been used for years. This shot introduces a spike protein to create anti bodies.
https://www.verywellhealth.com/novavax-covid-19-vaccine-5093292
NIH says that? Should I believe NIH? NIH does not have a good record for veracity.
It is a traditional vaccine using proteins from the virus with an adjuvant that has been studied for decades. Itās the safest vaccine so far.
Hard pass on this also
A few for the crowd, since Iāve read that there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine.
You need to isolate a virus to make a vaccine, basically the same way you need snake venom to make an antidoteā¦ā¦Have they ever isolated the virus? Iāve read that they havenāt. And is that a reason that these āvaccinesā which arenāt really vaccines, are doing weird things to peoples bodies?
Also read that there has never been a vaccine of any kind that is ā90% successfulā. So, why are these ones, that have been developed in months so much better than ones that have been around for decades and donāt do the damage these things seem to be doing?
Finally, at this point is there a reason anyone should believe anything that comes from this administration, the CDC, the NIH, the WHO, or any of the drug companies?
The same companies that are just cashing checks for treatments that they said would prevent covid, then said you can get it but it would lessen the symptoms, now say youāll need a booster or two, for now. And yes, you may end up in the hospital.
Then why do we need mask and mandatory vax?
You lost me at .gov
No vaccine is warranted for this virus. There is already safe, effective and inexpensive treatment. I’d rather take a drug that’s been around for 30-40 years (HCQ, ivermectin, etc) and has a proven track record than chance my health to a new, unproven, untested, potentially dangerous injection.