Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snopes Editor Doesn't Like the Facts, Comes to the Rescue of USA Today Fact-Checker Covering for Biden Regarding His Watch-Checking
Red State ^ | 09/04/2021 | Brad Slager

Posted on 09/04/2021 10:16:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2021 10:16:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So are they now saying that Biden was checking Corn Pop’s watch and therefore it wasn’t his?


2 posted on 09/04/2021 10:20:40 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Guess Snopes needs to be fact checked-


3 posted on 09/04/2021 10:22:29 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Duckspeakers doubleplusgood.

(or in regular English, the ****ers line up to defend each other in proportion to the absurdity of their lies)


4 posted on 09/04/2021 10:23:03 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They are running out of any prevalence.

Dementia Joe is the “spokesperson” for the deep state.

The Lord will let it leak out.


5 posted on 09/04/2021 10:26:54 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Snopes is a leftwing hack site. Even on non-political things they are often full of it.


6 posted on 09/04/2021 10:50:46 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult; Bob434
Getting defended by Snopes isn't as good as it used to be: The CEO of fact-checking site Snopes was caught plagiarizing dozens of articles
7 posted on 09/04/2021 10:52:46 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Snopes and facts. Doesn’t compute.


8 posted on 09/04/2021 10:54:11 PM PDT by bgill (.Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It’s easy to dunk on journalists when [...]

...and:

Anyone who dunks on that needs a hug and a nap.

I find their diction peculiar.

I am familiar with the transitive verb "to dunk" meaning "to immerse something or someone," as in "He dunked his doughnut into the coffee," or "He dunked the basketball through the hoop" - but to "dunk on someone or something?!"

Well, I guess that they are modern journalists, so we have to cut them some slack.

Regards,

9 posted on 09/04/2021 11:06:34 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
They are running out of any prevalence.

I think you meant: relevance.

Regards,

10 posted on 09/04/2021 11:08:29 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
but to "dunk on someone or something?!"

It's slang for a player in a game of basketball who showboats by not just beating his defender but dunking the ball instead of settling for a layup. The implication is that he is intentionally disrespecting his opponent.

11 posted on 09/04/2021 11:40:26 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
It's slang for a player in a game of basketball who showboats by not just beating his defender but dunking the ball instead of settling for a layup. The implication is that he is intentionally disrespecting his opponent.

Great! Now I have to look up the word "layup!"

So, is "to dunk on s.o." synonymous with "intentionally disrespect s.o.?" But the critics in this story are not "intentionally disrespecting" anyone, are they? That is not the "accusation." Rather, they are criticizing them.

I would have preferred, "to criticize," "to rebuke," or "to reproach s.o."

Regards,

12 posted on 09/04/2021 11:50:42 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
It’s easy to dunk on criticize journalists when we get things wrong confabulate things or distort the truth.

And it's especially easy when the so-called "journalists" and "fact-finders" are so brazen in their attempt to thwart the truth.

Regards,

13 posted on 09/04/2021 11:55:29 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Who will fact-check the fact checkers?

Who will expose the libtard doxxers?


14 posted on 09/05/2021 12:29:16 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Layup is when Kameltoe is on the bottom, as opposed to laid down.

I looked it up in Willie Brown’s dictionary.


15 posted on 09/05/2021 1:06:26 AM PDT by Laslo Fripp (The Sybil of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My, my. Being a fact checker. Always depending on someone else’s report to confirm or deny another’s work. Seems to only be used by liars. Who aspires to such a position?


16 posted on 09/05/2021 1:25:15 AM PDT by .44 Special (Taimid Buacharch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: alexander_busek

Of course, he means “dump on” but did not want to use a phrase with bathroom connotations, so he changed it to “dunk on” rather than write something different and accurate.

Yes, a modern “journalist.”


18 posted on 09/05/2021 4:21:06 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Come on man..."

Funke and Liles should, at the very least, get Participation Trophies!


19 posted on 09/05/2021 6:04:00 AM PDT by moovova (Joe Biden...Making the Taliban great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A beleaguered fact-check reporter at USA Today has been foundering for a few days……..

———————————————

Odd. Foundering is being misused again. A few days ago some one else misused this word and some Freepers and I discussed the difference between foundering and floundering.

Ships founder. Beleaguered fact-check reporters flounder.


20 posted on 09/05/2021 6:59:34 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I love my country. It's my government that I hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson