Posted on 09/04/2021 8:24:39 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
"Nearly everyone dying of the virus now is unvaccinated."
That has been the trope of anyone who has a platform or a modicum of power in America the past few months. And indeed, that is what we would expect from a vaccine that is as effective as the ones our government has traditionally endorsed. The problem is that a new CDC analysis, when coupled with Israel's experience of waning immunity, demonstrates that this statement is already untrue and will only become more obvious in the coming weeks.
"Population-based hospitalization rates show that unvaccinated adults aged ≥18 years are 17 times more likely to be hospitalized compared with vaccinated adults," concluded CDC researchers in a new analysis of COVID hospitalizations from Jan. 1 to June 30. That sounds very compelling, but when you look at their chart on page 23, it offers a very different perspective and is an ominous sign for the coming weeks.
Throughout the past two months, politicians have repeated the line ad nauseum that 97% of the people in the hospital are unvaccinated. Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R), who oversees one of the 13 states studied by CDC, claimed that 100% of all deaths in June were among the unvaccinated. But this analysis from the CDC states that instead, 76.6% of hospitalizations were unvaccinated, and that was in June before this wave got really bad. Given the rapid acceleration of waning immunity, inquiring minds would like to know what that number will look like heading into September.
As a stagnant percent of efficacy against critical illness (they've already given up on stopping transmission), this would not be a bad record for the vaccines. But given what we already know from Israel, our government needs to be honest with us about where things stand now.
Israel has already concluded that there is a "significant increase of the risk of infection in individuals who received their last vaccine dose since at least 146 days ago, particularly among patients older than 60." The CDC in this study also recognized that older people — who are both more vulnerable and were vaccinated earlier — composed a greater share of the vaccinated hospitalizations. So again, what is the true percentage of hospitalizations that are from vaccinated individuals, especially among seniors, as it stands now? Unlike in Israel and the U.K., our government refuses to publish that data, other than exaggerate with anecdotal numbers that are already contradicted by their own data from June.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, as of earlier this week, "the percentage who have been fully vaccinated ranges between 7% and 40%, doctors say, depending on the time period measured." If I were a betting man, I'd say the time period means the more recent it is, the higher the percentage of vaccinated.
Another important point to keep in mind is that the CDC has instructed vaccinated people not to get tested in most circumstances. As such, there is a massive differential between the number of mild cases that are picked up incidentally in the hospitals among those who are unvaccinated (but automatically tested when they come in for surgeries or other ailments) and those who are vaccinated. Keep in mind that during a period of prolific spread, it is very likely that people coming to the hospital for non-COVID issues will either pick up the virus there or have just gotten over it but can still test positive.
It's also important to note that although the CDC found a much higher hospitalization rate among the unvaccinated, once they were hospitalized, the number and proportion of fully vaccinated persons admitted to the ICU or who died were similar to unvaccinated persons. Furthermore, "Median length of stay was significantly longer in fully vaccinated persons (median 5 days (IQR 3–8) v. 4 days (IQR 2–9), respectively." That might be due to the vaccinated cohort being more weighted toward older people, but again, these are the people who needed the vaccine the most.
If it is the position of our government, like in Israel, that everyone will need a booster, then it raises the obvious question: Who says that it will even work as well for the next five months as the first one did, and what is the cost-benefit analysis, given the widespread side effects of the shots and the fact that there are other early treatments available that are being suppressed? Meaning, now that vaccines do not stop symptomatic illness and their protection against critical illness wears off over time, we need to revisit the four most important questions:
1) What is the true extent of the side effects from the vaccine? Just in the VAERS system alone, there is a 98-fold greater risk of dying from the COVID vaccine than from the flu vaccine, and the FDA admits in its approval letter (p. 6) that VAERS "will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks" like myocarditis and pericarditis.
2) Once we know the vaccine wears off, why is there no concern about the leaky vaccine creating viral immune escape and allowing the virus to become stronger and more durable, inducing a vicious cycle of mass vaccination and antibody dependent disease enhancement reinforcing each other with each subsequent booster? This is what happened with the leaky chicken vaccine that induced Marek's disease, in which the vaccinated chickens were temporarily spared from serious symptoms but carried a much greater viral load, compared to those who weren't vaccinated. With Israel having vaccinated 80% of its adults, 25% of whom have been given boosters, they now have the highest case per capita rate in the world. How is this not a concern about some form of vaccine-induced viral immune escape?
Israel now has the highest current case rate in the entire world.— PLC (@PLC)1630437327.0Oddly, Israel was also the first country to vacc… https://t.co/DLxUkgABUR
3) We are already seeing people hospitalized for COVID in Israel after the third shot, and data suggests that, just like with the first shot, people are actually more vulnerable to the virus in the week or so after getting the booster before it kicks in. Why are we not concerned about boosting during a period when the virus is circulating prolifically?
4) Given the censorship of dozens of potentially lifesaving preventive and early treatments with a much better safety record – from monoclonal antibodies on down – isn't that a better route to pursue?
On that last point, it's important to keep in mind that the "vaccine" is the one form of preventive that is being sanctioned. So, by definition, those who don't have it will be hospitalized more because they have zero options outside the hospital. Were we to even up the score with safer and more effective treatments, we'd be seeing a very different split in the hospital numbers. Then again, those who are vaccinated also need early treatment.
Those who say that nearly every COVID death at this point is avoidable are 100% correct. If we would allow and even guide all primary care doctors into prescribing early and often for their patients, the virus would have been done a long time ago.
How long ago did big pharma know there “needs” to be a booster because they knew their jab was a fail? What is inside the booster? Fight the delta, then the lambda? When did they know it’s been messing with the immune system?
Great article, thanks for posting.
True. There are other flaws in the reporting from CDC, etc. Unvaccinated people have experienced ZERO deaths and ZERO maimings from the vaccines. Those deaths and maimings (severe adverse vaccine events that will lead to disabled status and early death) must be added to their Fauci figures to see the real picture, and that increases the “vaccinated deaths,” whether by Covid19, a CV variant, or the vaccine itself, to a level that is thoroughly unacceptable. And we have no idea about all the vaccinated who claim to be fine, no immediate side effects - because in one year they might have cervical cancer, or in two years they have kidney failure - the potential mid and long term potential damage is all unknown.
The methodology for reporting is always parsed in various ways to report what the paying party wants reported. They extract a data set that supports their push to take these vaccines. So the people are left watching the bouncing ball until someone points out another study flaw.
For all people of all ages, the survival rate is exceptionally high 98-99.9% survival. The best conclusion is to Just Say NO to this mRNA permanent potental damage gene therapy garbage.
Good point. And I consider that another sneaky trick of massaging the numbers (you can prove anything with statistics!). The vaccine spike proteins go all over the body, and it is entirely a crap shoot if they will settle on any given organ in a devastating way since the spikes attach to ACE2 receptors. If they settle in the vessels of the lungs, then doesn’t that person present as a Covid19 patient, shedding virus proteins, unable to breathe? But they are counted as “unvaccinated” even though the vaccine itself induced the illness?
Nonsense. The critical number is how many people are being hurt and killed by the vaccine. Especially considering how treatable covid is with synthetic antibodies. And last I checked, smallpox vaccines don’t require injections of trillions of spike protein inducing nanoparticles every six months for the rest of your life.
You have no idea what the death rate is for vaccine adverse events because there are no studies of mid and long term effects. You are only noting immediate adverse events like a sudden heart attack death in a 20 yo right after the jab. But if a heart is unknowingly damaged, and leads to early death in 5 years or 20 years for that 20 yo, you cannot say.
The jabs cause the body to produce spike proteins that are released to the bloodstream. While your immune system is training... the spikes attach to ACE2 receptors wherever they go leading to blood clots (that’s my understanding of it from the doctors calling them “clot shots” - forgive me if I am oversimplifying). Which one of your vital organs do you want to sacrifice, or are small clots (scar tissue) everywhere okay for you - wait, you don’t get a choice, it’s a crap shoot.
The blood clots remind me of the damage from vascular dementia where the sufferer is having mini-strokes all over the brain leading to slow loss of brain tissue and function.
If you don’t mind could you give a few details. What group do you fall in age-wise? We’re you taking any prophylactics (zinc,C,D, etc.)? What did you take when you found you were COVID positive? Thanks.
61, male, coronary artery decease, High blood pressure, high cholesterol, bmi=29
I take vitamins including extra D, C and Zinc daily. And my meds from the above ailments. I could not get a single doctor to prescribe me anything, not even a cough drop. But I did get Z-Pac from a friend that had extra. I started the Z-Pac as soon as I suspected I was sick for 5 days.
Thanks.
I love my Doctor but she disappointed me for the first time when I was diagnosed. I was expecting a list of things to do and try and she wrote me this: âÂÂGet better soon!âÂÂ. Kid you not.
Later on I messaged her again and asked for a little more detail on options and she replied she could write me a prescription for an inhaler and steroids. Besides that I suspect she wants me to go to the hospital if I get worse and not her office.
There is no better experience in life than PERSONAL experience.
My 100+ neighbors in our condo complex who have received 2 jabs report no adverse side effects. Me personally at age 81, 6 months after the 2 jabs am healthier now than 6 months ago.
I trust experience from people I know more than anything from CDC.
By all means give everyone else’s choices away based on your limited data. Get on your knees slave. Pathetic response. Put your neighbor and country under political lockdown under penalty of law / loss of god derived freedom based on your limited “experience “. 🐓 👅
I have dealt with more than a dozen different doctors during my 81 years on earth. Not a single doctor asked me if I had a regular exercise routine. This daily exercise routine for 23 minutes is keeping me out of doctor’s office.
https://youtu.be/I55ZxIwbuOU
Where did you read lockdowns in my post?
Are you suffering from paranoia? May be see a shrink could help.
You have been a cheerleader for 18 months now. You have eyes where this is going. Yet you keep cheering. You need to see a shrink for cognitive dissonance. You want both the deep state cure / vaccines (I think they are now saying 4) plus your on FR pretending to want individual liberty. Can’t have both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
