Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.
Jon Rappoport's Blog ^ | Oct 8, 2021 | Jon Rappoport

Posted on 09/04/2021 8:06:21 AM PDT by foundedonpurpose

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available. Oct 8 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport

October 8, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39 [The ‘Dec 1, 2020’ version moved it to page 42], in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Education; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: assdr; cdc; covid; covid19; dipshitonpurpose; isolates; quantified
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: flamberge

“Turns out the S1 protein is toxic all by itself and causes pathological blood clotting.”

Can you provide a source for the toxicity of the vaccine spike protein?


41 posted on 09/04/2021 5:55:15 PM PDT by Pelham (No more words, now we fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

Thank you. Makes sense.


42 posted on 09/04/2021 6:39:32 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

FREEgards and Enjoy rest of your night :)


43 posted on 09/04/2021 7:04:05 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Don't Australia my America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose
WHAT covid you talkin' 'bout, Willis ?
44 posted on 09/04/2021 7:15:13 PM PDT by knarf (qa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Israel has a completely different set of stats but keep slurping the DS ejaculate.


45 posted on 09/04/2021 8:36:04 PM PDT by wgmalabama (We will find out if the Vac or virus risk was the correct choice - can we put truth above narrative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I guess you don’t have to slurp you mainline it. Line up for the never ending ejaculate shots. You scared selfish little itched. You deserve what is coming. It’s coming. In this life or the next. Cowards live eternity in fear.


46 posted on 09/04/2021 8:39:54 PM PDT by wgmalabama (We will find out if the Vac or virus risk was the correct choice - can we put truth above narrative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Can you provide a source for the toxicity of the vaccine spike protein?

Yes. Quite a few actually.

See this article by Canadian researcher Byram Bridie of the University of Guleph, Ontario

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/

See also this article by Robert Gorter, MD

http://robert-gorter.info/covid-19-spike-protein-potentially-unsafe-toxic-endothelial-pathogen/

See also this article by Danish Idress and Vijay Kumar (and some of the referenced articles

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33789211/

See also this article by researchers Andrey V Letrov, Vladisslav V Babenlo, and Eguene E. Kulikov

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33838638/

See also this article by Dr J Patrick Whelan, Pediatric Rheumatologist

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-spike-in-vaccines-cause-blood-clots-brain-inflammation-and-heart-attacks/

There are hundreds more. It just gets tedious to list them.

A large number of medical researchers have some real serious doubts about the safety of S1 protein and preliminary data from the researchers does not look especially reassuring. To be sure, it is not at the level of "proof beyond reasonable doubt" - yet.

There seems to be an increase in the number of young people who have cardiac inflammation, embolisms, strokes, and kidney problems, and those seem to correlate with receiving the mRNA treatment. Maybe it is coincidental and other factors are involved.

This should be very carefully watched. It is not being carefully watched.

47 posted on 09/04/2021 9:11:40 PM PDT by flamberge (Time has run out. Work with what you've got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

* * *


48 posted on 09/04/2021 11:28:36 PM PDT by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“If you read the report:

Serial dilutions of quantified inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus (USA-WA1/2020; 100 RNA copies/µL)
in lysis buffer were added to pooled negative upper respiratory tract specimen matrix”

I assume you are referring to the 80 page CDC report. Could you please identify the page in question?


49 posted on 09/05/2021 12:58:45 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Thanks for the discussion.

I first heard of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) reaction from Dr. Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors. I was not familiar with the term before. I’m confident that few Americans have ever heard of ADE.


50 posted on 09/05/2021 1:04:25 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DHerion

“Moderna admitted, in a TV interview, they designed their vaccine based on a digital file of the Spike Protein uploaded by the Wuhan Lab in China”

Well isn’t that encouraging? (sarcasm)


51 posted on 09/05/2021 1:07:34 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

“There are still virologists who maintain that the variants of COVID-19 all contain sequences which bear markers as “gain-of-function” inserts which could have only occurred by manipulation in a laboratory settings.”

“Gain-of-function” is yet another “novel” term for me since this pandemic first appeared. It is suggestive, but what does it really mean?


52 posted on 09/05/2021 1:14:50 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Lonny

“Yet China’s vaccine is not a mRNA “vaccine” but uses the actual dead virus to trigger antibodies:

“The Beijing-based biopharmaceutical company Sinovac is behind the CoronaVac, an inactivated vaccine.”

I wouldn’t be the first in line to get a vaccine from communist China. That said, I would prefer a traditional vaccine over our novel experimental gene therapy.


53 posted on 09/05/2021 1:18:16 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

“NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.”

I believe this has been addressed in posts 8, 10, 15, 30 and 32. :)


54 posted on 09/05/2021 1:25:52 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Viruses are too small to be stopped by our porous masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
Gain of function.....but what does it really mean?

This is a technical term of art used by the researchers who are manipulating virus and bacterial genomes.

It means exactly what it sounds like. The genetic sequences are altered using CRISPR technology to create a new organism which has capabilities the ancestor did not have.

COVID started out as a research program at the University of Toronto where they were altering coronavirus. They were specifically looking at ways to make the virus more capable of entering human cells.

You might think this was a really bad idea. Eventually, so did the folks at Toronto. In 2015, they discontinued the program, judging it to be too high risk.

The Chinese scientists working on that program were promptly hired by the laboratory at Wuhan. They took their research notes and stolen samples of virus with them. It was a noted scandal at the time. Look it up. The stories are still out there.

Oddly enough, the US Government got involved, to the extent of a four million dollar grant to Wuhan. This was arranged by no less than Dr Fauchi himself. Presumably the people involved expected they were buying access to reports on the program.

COVID-19 was most likely (IMO) an accidental release due to sloppy lab procedures, and the accident probably happened in late September of 2019.

I am reminded of a line from the Science Fiction/Horror Story by Stephen King, "The Stand", which started out with a leak from a bio-warfare laboratory.

"Now you know it works. Any questions?"

55 posted on 09/05/2021 4:24:06 PM PDT by flamberge (Time has run out. Work with what you've got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download


56 posted on 09/07/2021 8:06:56 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

What they arent telling you is that many hospitals aren’t even testing vaxxed for covid UNLESS they are specially they’re because of covid.

Using percentages instead of real numbers is a great way to manipulate the reader also.

What they WON’T tell us is how many vaxxed are actually infected or how that compares to the number of hospitalizations/deaths. The couple of times it has been attempted, the hosp and death rates for vaxxed were WAAAY more than unvaxxed.

Get those numbers then let’s talk.


57 posted on 09/09/2021 5:48:29 AM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson