Posted on 09/04/2021 8:06:21 AM PDT by foundedonpurpose
The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available. Oct 8 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport
October 8, 2020
(To join our email list, click here.)
The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.
Buried deep in the document, on page 39 [The ‘Dec 1, 2020’ version moved it to page 42], in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.
As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.
And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.
If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.
This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.
“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.
“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.
“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.
Science is not assumptions.
“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”
They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…
Science is not assumptions.
The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.
The Matrix Revealed
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Even the stupidest of people can discern that samples of the virus are available in every hospital in the world.
And samples of the original available in nearly every graveyard.
Apparently it’s conspiracy theory Saturday.
Why did you change the date to Oct 8 2021?
This is a completely ridiculous assertion. FR should be renamed to MoonbatRepublic, if this keeps up...
OK, if the virus is available why don’t we have a typical vaccine made using it?
What further cracks me up is that a smoking gun is absolute proof of something. This idiot says rust the smoking gun is lack of proof. Some of the people who enjoy putting their moonbattery on full display do not even have a rudimentary understand of the language.
“If this is incorrect, prove it because the experts keep running away from this question, or they ignore it.”
If you read the report:
Serial dilutions of quantified inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus (USA-WA1/2020; 100 RNA copies/µL)
in lysis buffer were added to pooled negative upper respiratory tract specimen matrix
You’re not suppose to read the report and then outline details……..
Just base your comments on the EXPLOSIVE, BOMBSHELL Title.
Also, if the Date was changed…….ignore it. Its for our own good.
Thanks for posting. I’m disappointed with the insulting responses that you received. I think there has been a lot of faulty information provided by the MSM and Government. That engenders skepticism. We are right to be skeptical, but skepticism alone does not give us the truth.
Here’s an article which claims that the Wuhan virus has been identified:
https://theconversation.com/i-study-viruses-how-our-team-isolated-the-new-coronavirus-to-fight-the-global-pandemic-133675
Uh, yeahhhh... Ok. Whatever you say, Shakespeare.
You forgot BOOM
I’ll try and put it in iambic pentameter next time
I was gonna add it but I was caught up with typing “Boom”, or “Boom-ola”, and “Boomology” followed by 40 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your conclusion is incorrect - and, I have explained why many times at Free Republic since 2020.
The paragraph you quote is referring to lab prepared TEST samples that had a precise number of COVID viruses per unit volume.
Because the original PCR COVID test was set for something like 44 cycles, no one could tell if a positive test was for a large or small number of viruses.
Clinics were asking the CDC for a test that could give the exact number of viruses per unit volume.
The CDC was explaining that they did not have the technology to make a test like that.
The original COVID virus was isolated and universally published in January 2020.
Because it is too hard to do.
At least three previous attempts to make a coronavirus vaccine using killed or inactivated virus samples failed. The failure was due to the infamous Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) reaction.
Which killed all of the laboratory test animals in each of those projects.
That approach was considered a dead end. The clever plan shifted to creating synthetic protein fragments from part of the coronavirus and provoking an immune response to them. What a clever idea!
So, which protein fragment? How about that S1 protein? It is stable and does not provoke the ADE response. And how do we generated it? Lets use RNA injections and get the patient to generate it themselves. What a clever idea! Have our lobbyists get some government sponsors and project money right away!
Oops. Turns out the S1 protein is toxic all by itself and causes pathological blood clotting. Just ignore those D-Dimer tests. They are not proof of anything. And all those heart attacks and stroke in 20-somethings and 30-somethings? Merely coincidental, we assure you.
Oops, the S1 protein can invade all tissue including the brain. But that vaccine fog will clear up in a couple of months, and it only affects a tiny percentage of the test subjects - err patients. Not to worry.
Oops, turns out the COVID virus mutates daily and has new seasonal variants of the S1 protein which evade the original immune response.
Oops, the new vaccine does not protect against the new seasonal variants. You'll need a booster after 8 months. Oops, make that six months.
Well, actually, if you die from COVID and your last vaccination was more that three months ago, we are going to classify you as "un-vaccinated".
Oops.
iirc there are reports with it containing part of the AIDS virus and monkeystuff, etc,
true or not, how did they sequence it to come to those conclusions without a sample?
You are embarrassing everyone here on FR. Just another post seemingly intended to make “conservatives” look stupid. Are you a troll?
Thanks - that was helpful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.