The DemSocRats are in 100% control of the USSA today.
It's just taking most normies a long time to recognize contemporary reality.
Amy Phony Barrett - the new David Souter
Barrett betrayed the IU students with one stroke of her pen.
She should resign for being a fraudulent appointment.
The Deep State is deeper than we thought.
“I’ve noticed that on all these high profile cases she gets, she never gives a reason for her decisions. It’s like “I’m ruling this way and I have no comment” lol.”
Since the appeals court cited a 1905 USSC ruling on states rights regarding vaccines she did not have to give a reason.
Amy Coney Roberts is compromised already?
Isn’t she a conservative?
Makes you wonder if she was a plant from the very beginning.
yes well after Texas hopefully no one should be surprised—especially President Trump.
obviously these were uniparty pics that Trump basically signed off on.
This seems like the right decision. I don’t see a federal legal issue here; each state can make its own laws in this area. Just like there would be no federal legal issue to challenge Florida’s mandate that masks/vaccines can’t be required.
SPIT!
Wow, she sure pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes huh? She’s no conservative.
The DemSocRats are in 100% control of the USSA today.
It's just taking most normies a long time to recognize contemporary reality.
I knew she was a bad’un when I looked into her background so I’m not surprised. All hat and no cattle. Now we have to live with for quite a while and no chance of divorce. This request was a no-brainer and she, of course, took the wrong side.
What a mistake Trump made choosing her and the other two. I’m sure the swampers infiltrated Trump’s circle of advisers in order to produce those three scoundrels. Maybe it’s time to start using computers that are programmed to decide legal cases based solely on the original US Constitution and accepted moral standards.
Or she feels she does not need to answer or explain to we, the little guys. What arrogance.
I just can’t understand how Trump whiffed in some degree on all three picks. As bad as they were at other things, at least Bush the Elder got us Clarence Thomas and W got us Alito. Those surrounding Trump gave him very bad advice. He should sue for fraud and the opportunity to make replacement picks.
1. Unless there is legal reasoning for a judge to not hear a case, then why should the judge refuse the case. 2. And if there is legal reasoning to refuse the case, then shouldn’t that reasoning be made known? I think it should but I think we cannot obtain that demand without getting it spelled out in the Constitution.
Very few men can be trusted to be a SCOTUS justice however looks like never for a woman.
Never forget, no matter how digraceful, disgusting, egregious, deplorable, or demented today may be, tomorrow will be worse. Because the libs are in charge and we’re being held captive in the Cuckoo’s Nest. As bad as it seems at the moment you will look back on today as the good old day by tomorrow afternoon. 😷
Boy, we can pickum!