Posted on 08/12/2021 8:34:44 AM PDT by White Lives Matter
One of Mike Lindell’s cyber experts bailed on the China hack theory earlier this week and spoke with the media. Why now? Why would he wait until the week of the symposium to bail?
Josh Merrritt, aka “Spyder” spoke to the media this week:
The cyber expert on the “red team” hired by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell now says the key data underpinning the theory that China hacked the 2020 election unveiled at the Cyber Symposium is illegitimate.
TRENDING: Mike Lindell Opens Thursday Cyber Symposium with SHOCKING Developments: Another Home Raided, Credible Threats, Conference Infiltrated
Mr. Lindell said he had 37 terabytes of “irrefutable” evidence that hackers, who he said were backed by China, broke into election systems and switched votes in favor of President Biden. The proof, he said, is visible in intercepted network data or “packet captures” that were collected by hackers and could be unencrypted to reveal that a cyberattack occurred and that votes were switched.
But cyber expert Josh Merritt, who is on the team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, told The Washington Times that packet captures are unrecoverable in the data and that the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyber incursion by China.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Money changes people.
Big money changes people bigly.
They want the $5 Million Prize that Lindell offered for discrediting
I don’t think the symposium will over turn the election...
I think it WILL open a lot of eyes though.
Face it, there is no resolution to this at least not the one we are looking for. This guy, although not working for Lindell directly, is going to be held up as ‘the “expert” who worked on Lindell’s team and completely disputes Lindell’s ‘theory’ of fraud. And this will be the end of it. The wind has been taken out of that sail.
Did this guy speak there or bail before. Sorry I didn’t read the whole thing. Maybe going after the 5 million or paid off.
I think what Dr. Shiva pointed out in the 10am central time section is quite damning. What are the chances that the difference in the vote count reported by the media vs the vote count reported in Lindell's data is exactly 4.2 percent for all the states? They didn't use some convoluted algorithm to do the hack. They used a monkey wrench!
John Gotti used to buy jurists and judges. Same thing here.
It’s off the table.
Montgomery supposedly procured the data packets. Lindell hung with flea bags and now has a big case of them.
LOL! Of course, THIS guy’s opinion is irrefutable....
Lindel said he’d pay $5MM to anyone who could discredit his data. If this dude were credible he would go after the money and wave it on camera. As it is, he is just making a random assertion that he can’t back up. Just something for the media to glom on to.
Between Franks and Shiva, I am absolutely convinced America has been usurped by thieves, some of whom Joe Biden’s ‘team’ were communicating with. we had a good run, but we do not have enough patriots left in the federal system to save the Republic.
And Montgomery had an alleged stroke on the eve of the symposium and hasn’t been seen or heard of since.
It creates a lot of food for thought but not conclusive evidence. Lindell promised deliverables that he can’t deliver.
He sold Lindell the data. The data which is apparently locked in proprietary “blx” format (Montgomery runs a front called “blxware”), so nobody can access it or analyze it.
Lindell just disputed the claim from writer Larry Johnson in the Gateway Pundit article. Said they are checking him out believe he may be CIA???
Live on the symposium just a few minutes before 11AM CST, they remarked on this “story” and said that it is... and I quote, “A lie.”
Ok... “I want to believe”. I see the smoke. We’re choking on smoke and dying from hypoxia.
Now show me where the fire is...
He first admitted to people at the symposium where they got the data and that it couldn’t be accessed after Dennis Montgomery, the source of the data, bailed on the symposium due to an alleged “stroke”.
But cyber expert Josh Merritt, who is on the team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, told The Washington Times that packet captures are unrecoverable in the data and that the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyber incursion by China.
They why are they called packet “captures” then? I watched his Absolute Proof. They had a spread sheet displaying the to and from IP addresses. You can perform a simple nslook up on the IP address from a cmd wimdow and prove where they came from, and from what I tested were dead on accurate.
Money, or threats against family are frequently effective in changing analysis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.