Money changes people.
Big money changes people bigly.
They want the $5 Million Prize that Lindell offered for discrediting
I don’t think the symposium will over turn the election...
I think it WILL open a lot of eyes though.
Face it, there is no resolution to this at least not the one we are looking for. This guy, although not working for Lindell directly, is going to be held up as ‘the “expert” who worked on Lindell’s team and completely disputes Lindell’s ‘theory’ of fraud. And this will be the end of it. The wind has been taken out of that sail.
Did this guy speak there or bail before. Sorry I didn’t read the whole thing. Maybe going after the 5 million or paid off.
John Gotti used to buy jurists and judges. Same thing here.
Montgomery supposedly procured the data packets. Lindell hung with flea bags and now has a big case of them.
LOL! Of course, THIS guy’s opinion is irrefutable....
Lindel said he’d pay $5MM to anyone who could discredit his data. If this dude were credible he would go after the money and wave it on camera. As it is, he is just making a random assertion that he can’t back up. Just something for the media to glom on to.
He sold Lindell the data. The data which is apparently locked in proprietary “blx” format (Montgomery runs a front called “blxware”), so nobody can access it or analyze it.
Live on the symposium just a few minutes before 11AM CST, they remarked on this “story” and said that it is... and I quote, “A lie.”
Ok... “I want to believe”. I see the smoke. We’re choking on smoke and dying from hypoxia.
Now show me where the fire is...
But cyber expert Josh Merritt, who is on the team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, told The Washington Times that packet captures are unrecoverable in the data and that the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyber incursion by China.
They why are they called packet “captures” then? I watched his Absolute Proof. They had a spread sheet displaying the to and from IP addresses. You can perform a simple nslook up on the IP address from a cmd wimdow and prove where they came from, and from what I tested were dead on accurate.
Money, or threats against family are frequently effective in changing analysis.
One guy. Out of how many?
Lindell was conned. Fake whistle blower with fake data. All used to discredit him forever.
IIRC Lindell said the results would be what everyone was talking about the day after the symposium. He now has less than 24 hrs to prove his case unless we have to wait another two weeks.
Montgomery is a longtime scammer. The only question is whether you believe that Lindell was somehow a huge patsy who was impervious to all those who knew better warning him—or was in on it as well. I certainly don’t know.
This thread has been debunked. Lots of trolls these days.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3984519/posts