Posted on 07/29/2021 7:52:57 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Great questions from Harrison Smith!
Can the government inject anything into our veins without our informed consent?
What mitigating factor at all is there in a mandated vaccine order?
What threshold have we reached that makes it an appropriate response now and not later?
If you can't consent to the jab, and it's being force on you anyway. Do you have to know about it? After all you can't reject it?
If you know about it or you do not know about it. You are still getting the shot so why should they have to tell you?
Can they administer anything to you that way if it's for your own good? If it is for public safety?
https://twitter.com/Harrison_of_TX/status/1420915689443926016
Not if they can’t catch me.
how we burned in the camps....
They can inject it into my corpse.
Or perhaps even into my restrained, unconscious but still alive body, if they are stealthy.
Oh yes. They can do this. As someone who has worked with mentally ill adults, I know a person can be 5150’ed, or involuntarily committed to a hospital or qualified facility for up to 3 days.
If, during that time, the patient becomes violent or actively suicidal, then, I believe they can be ‘denied egress’, meaning they can’t leave a particular room.
If the aggitation escalates, they can be ‘administered’ a sedative via pill or injection, usually something like Haldol or Risperadahl.
I hope that by many having read and internalized that, we will be able to avoid the same fate.
Can the government inject anything into our veins without our informed consent?
yes, the ‘government’ is filled with maoists, ‘political power comes out of the barrel of a gun’...
No.
The answer is not going to change.
These are medical devices. I thought they cannot mandate medical devices into/onto individuals.
Isn’t that what the Nuremberg Trials were all about?
I will consider anyone trying to physically force me to get “the jab” exactly the same as I would someone holding a knife to my throat. Exactly the same. I will respond just as I would in that case - with deadly force.
We can always administer lead to those who try.
They may decide to just put it in the water supply
they would abuse it and illegally assign a 5150 to someone who does not want it though
color of law doesn’t make it legal, which it would be in this situation
no more legally correct than a chinese show court
Karens:
His arm, your womb.
Control yourselves.
I’m pro-vax, but I must reserve the basic human right to control what is put into my body and I know that others must also have the full ability to do so too.
Since 99%+ of the people dying of Covid now are unvaccinated, persuasion is possible and is the proper way forward.
The media can make it well know that Trump, Pence, Biden, Harris, Pelosi and her House Democratic teammates and Schumer and his Senate Democratic teammates are all fully vaccinated. 100%.
Professional ballplayers and community leaders can appear on TV to persuade minority holdouts.
not just devices, treatments and experiments as well
Good luck with that.
I have a private well.
And ill share
Site me an instance where the federal government did this post Nuremberg Code?
maybe but it doesn’t have a long life once out of the deep freezers
further who knows if water filters might reduce it for you
but this is just one vector
consider the blood supply, it is now tainted
organ transplants
saliva
Licensed paramedics and RNs can inject chemical restraints on the grounds of ‘protecting the safety of others’ but I don’t think that’s likely to happen in a gen pop
Military - government issue, one each: members are required to maintain the human body in fighting condition. This would include mandatory vaccines. Military may allow for conscious objector type status but the person would be reassigned to counting bullet casings on the firing range or sweeping roofs, away from the gen pop.
Civilians - depends on state/county health dept order - vaccine or quarantine is pretty much the standard. People having a right not to be vaccinated but no right to infringe on other’s rights to not be intentionally exposed. (this would lean on laws that make it unethical and illegal to intentionally expose vaccine trial participants to disease, and since we’re one huge ‘trial’...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.