Bannon’s ‘War Room’ just became must-see TV at 5 p.m.
Bennett replied: “You wouldn't.”
Unless, of course, you very high resolution digital machine vision images and sophisticated digital pattern matching software to compare ballots to search for and identify duplicates. Like what we saw in the Georgia presentation yesterday
No serial number equal fraudulent ballot. That should have been caught in the original recount.
Of course it's the Supreme Court "justices" themselves who are the shame.
... and, amazingly enough, they were all votes for Joe ...
None of this was supposed to be exposed. Like a mobster with cement overshoes, it was supposed to “sleep with the fishes”. But, something washed ashore, then, divers were sent to explore the wreak of the “Election of 2020”. What they found will change the narrative, to say the least.
A bigger discrepancy was the mail in votes sent out vs. those received. The hearing on OAN was very interesting!
Bookmark
Charlie Kirk reported the following.
According to sworn testimony in front of the Arizona State Senate: 11,326 voters in Maricopa County were NOT on the voters rolls on 11/7/20 but WERE on the voter rolls on 12/4/20 AND were marked as VOTED in the November 3 election. The margin of “victory” in Arizona was 10,457 votes.
Why would ballots ever NOT have a serial number?
They must be produced by a process. The process either includes marking each ballot with a unique serial number, or it doesn’t.
Is there a law that says AZ ballots must have a serial number?
Won’t they just claim ballots were sent without them and too bad? Seems obvious if every ballot was supposed to have a serial and many didn’t that would have been found months ago. Someone clarify.
So what can be done at this point?
I’m surprised the Dems haven’t swooped in and shut all this down, all in the name of “spreading falsehoods and mis-information.”
They could do this.
Who/what would stop them?