Posted on 07/10/2021 12:48:56 PM PDT by blam
We have been discussing the movement in journalism to discard out-dated notions of objectivity and define journalism as a form of advocacy. Now, Lauren Wolfe, the recently fired freelance editor for the New York Times, has not only gone public to defend her pro-Biden tweet but published a piece titled “I’m a Biased Journalist and I’m Okay With That.” It is a full-throated endorsement of the new journalistic model of open bias and advocacy. Indeed, Wolfe may have only been undone by her expressly declaring bias as opposed to reflecting bias in her writings.
Wolfe was fired by the Times after she expressed the joy of watching the arrival of then-President-elect Joe Biden at Joint Base Andrews ahead of his inauguration by writing “I have chills.”
Now, in her column in the Washington Monthly, Wolfe insists that the is nothing incompatible with being biased and being a journalist. Indeed, she noted ever since she began as a journalist “angry people come out of their hidey-holes to yell at me.” It is certainly true that writers today are constantly barraged by trolls and critics. However, Wolfe then proceeded to fulfill that very stereotype by embracing bias as right and good in journalism. She attacks the very notion of objectivity that was once the touchstone of modern journalism.
“I’ve always believed it is better to be open about my views on the issues I cover, which for a long time have been war and international human rights. And yes, I often do write with an agenda—with an eye toward creating change. So yes, I am biased, and consciously so when it comes to certain subjects—especially when I’m reporting on criminality. But I don’t see that as a bad thing.”
According to Wolfe, the “bad thing” is the “relentless need to find objective balance” by news organization which “has actually led to dangerous imbalance—with outlets too often giving as much space to lies as to facts.” It is the liberal version of the “fake news” mantra. Views that you reject are “lies” and thus you cannot publish lies as a journalist. Done.
While Wolfe insists in the end that “I work very hard to create unbiased journalism—that’s what a professional does,” she makes objectivity itself into a form of journalistic malpractice. She is not alone. Everyone agrees that journalists like other professionals have bias. However, the defining struggle of modern journalist was overcoming bias to report objectively on news stories. The new journalistic model flips that principle on its head. Now the bias is simply a preference for the truth and thus it is perfectly appropriate to frame news according to what you believe is true and correct.
We have have been discussing how writers, editors, commentators, and academics have embraced rising calls for censorship and speech controls, including President-elect Joe Biden and his key advisers. Even journalists are leading attacks on free speech and the free press. This includes academics rejecting the very concept of objectivity in journalism in favor of open advocacy. Columbia Journalism Dean and New Yorker writer Steve Coll has denounced how the First Amendment right to freedom of speech was being “weaponized” to protect disinformation. In an interview with The Stanford Daily, Stanford journalism professor, Ted Glasser, insisted that journalism needed to “free itself from this notion of objectivity to develop a sense of social justice.” He rejected the notion that the journalism is based on objectivity and said that he views “journalists as activists because journalism at its best — and indeed history at its best — is all about morality.” Thus, “Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity.”
These journalists are killing their very profession. While many now prefer to get their news for echo journalistic sources that offer consistent and confirming coverage, most people are not interested in learning about news through the filter of what Wolfe considers valid. For years, we have been discussing the decline of journalism values with the rise of open bias in the media. Now, a newly released report from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford has found something that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. The plunging level of trust reflects the loss of the premier news organizations to a type of woke journalism.
The Wolfe firing was a surprise given the New York Times’ heavy bias shown in the Cotton controversy and the tolerance shown for conspiracy theories from other writers. However, Wolfe’s defense sounds a lot like the closing argument of her editors in justifying her termination.
Being “OK” with something doesn’t make it right. It could just mean a lack of conscious or integrity.
She is not a Journalist, she is an Opinion Columnist
She just needs to understand the difference.
There is no such thing.
You can be liberal or conservative or whatever, but once you come to the office you are a journalist.
Period.
How would she like it if the bartender or restaurant owner of phone shops owner refuses to serve her because she is hard core, fanatic Democrat?
I actually don’t disagree with her. Not at all, I don’t think. The history of journalism as being partisan goes back to the beginning of the republic. It’s the insufferable pretense that it’s not so if what aggravates me
The difference is that we used to have a choice, most cities used to have two newspapers, one was generally more conservative than the other.
I would love to come out of my Heidi Hole and yell at this propagandist.
I remember when the New York Times was a great newspaper...many many years ago
This woman is too deranged to realize how useless she is to this planet.
I agree. But there may be people who are close to being a Journalist but can you give me their names?
The list of nonpartisan investigative journalists is a short one.
most are ‘propaganda repeaters.’
Everyone has some bias and that will filter in to one’s writing to some extent. But real journalism tries to be better. You should try to cover events as objectively as possible. And you shouldn’t write as if it were a team sport with you being on one of the teams. That’s the real problem. Leftist and establishment journalists are often pushing an agenda.
The Times hasn’t been a great newspaper since I was a kid and that was a long time ago.
“I have chills.”
If only this God-forsaken country just had “chills”. What it has is 4th stage metastatic cancer and there are no competent doctors left in the house. And people like this foul woman are the root cause of the terminal illness.
I would read Glen Greenwald and see what you think. He is a world better than any of the partisan Democrat/fauxjournalists that get all the airtime.
There. Fixed it.
I’m okay with her being fired. Cuts both ways.
So what do they think it is that makes their opinion something that we should care about? Everyone has one and most are garbage. The privilege of sharing has to be earned. And we know that their bias distorts and omits facts that we might consider important, making the news value of what they say absolutely worthless. So what, exactly, do they bring to the table?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.