Posted on 07/02/2021 11:51:30 AM PDT by A.M. Smith
Newly resurfaced video footage appears to confirm speculation that the man who shot and killed Capitol protester Ashli Babbitt was Capitol Hill Lt. Michael Leroy Byrd, who was NOT assigned to protect Vice President Mike Pence, as reported by mainstream media outlets.
The video footage of the black man in the suit has been extensively archived on the internet, and it plainly contradicts mainstream media accounts, citing anonymous intelligence community sources, which claim that a Secret Service member assigned to Mike Pence shot Babbitt.
Independent journalist Tayler Hansen stated that Capitol Hill Lt. Michael Leroy Byrd was the one who shot Babbitt on April 13 of this year. No instance of this assertion being challenged is known at this time.
(Excerpt) Read more at en-volve.com ...
With all those Glocks in the hands of this glorified mall security it’s a wonder there aren’t a whole ton more AD’s of themselves and others.
Not sure. Whenever I violently storm a federal building like Antifa does in this way in Seattle or Portland, break through glass protecting the physical inner security of the place with a federal LEO aiming a handgun at my chest ordering to stop (and others warning around me) and deep in a hardcore violent unlawful MOB yelling for the assassination of US officials inside just a few yards away, **I**usually wear quality Coolmax Pro 100% kevlar bulletproof protection and survival.
Then again, I don’t do such foolish stuff to endanger my life or others around me. And I’m here alive to post about it.
just great....take out the women holding babies first , it will disorient the primary target
Geez, I meant Jan 6.
Say slowly after me: "Da .... vid ... Bai ... ley". That's the name of the shooter who 100%, money-back guarantee, bet your house on it, fer sure, fer sure, fer sure! shot Ashli Babbitt, according to all the Elite Conspiracy Theorists back in Jan (and Feb, and Mar, and Apr ...) - and who was the subject of the thread we were posting on.
And you doofuses swallowed it hook line & sinker, based on a few pixels that showed what could be a bracelet with white & black beads in the photo of the shooter, and also in a photo of Bailey receiving an award for saving Scalise's life at the GOP softball game. Plus a few pixels of the shooter's skin in the shade that they unconvincingly interpreted as black skin.
And so now, you all jump from one conspiracy bandwagon to the next without any shame or even a single "Oops, guess I was wrong". But rather, like something out of 1984, you instantly rewrite your past pronouncements by pretending that you didn't spend all those weeks trumpeting that Bailey shot Ashlii. Instead, you instantly pivot to: "Hey! We knew it was Lt. Michael Byrd all along, and that's what we've ALWAYS said".
LOL! It's you who needs to eat crow son. Shouldn't be too hard, as it appears you're one who feasts on roadkill regularly.
Never heard of this Byrd until now. Gosh, the conspiracies change so fast with each one contradicting the previous one, it makes your head spin.
A quick google of Lt Mike Byrd shows he is ID-ed as the shooter by a whole slew of internationally-known websites with stellar reputations for accuracy: "dnronoline" & "tigerdroppings" & "sfcmac" & "volnation" & "bandcamp" & reddit & twitter & that's just the first page .... Wow! Anything you see on websites like these which have such unimpeachable reputations, you can certainly take to the bank, eh?
So .... let's just take a look at the proof of the pudding in this article above, that says Byrd did the deed: "Independent journalist ... stated that ... Byrd was the one who shot Babbitt.... No instance of this assertion being challenged is known at this time..."
Oh my word, that last sentence ... now if that isn't the gold standard of Proof-Of-Truth, then I certainly don't know what is!
Let's apply this same Gold Standard of Truth to you, Mr. illogi_cal869: I will right here & now assert that your mother was a princess and your father was a frog. And if by this time tomorrow, "No instance of this assertion being challenged is known at this time," then Voila! It must be true.
LOLOL! Your offer of crow to someone else sure backfired with both barrels on you, eh?
I look forward to next month, when you pin it on Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson or whatever the latest harebrained bandwagon is, and claim that you knew it was them all along, and you've never, never claimed otherwise. I breathlessly await.
Crazed and unbelievable (you, not whomever you’re attacking). Sorry to intervene, but this post appeared on my thread...or whatever the list of posts is called.
I said he was black; you fantasized that he was white and now harbor some delusion of grandeur.
Whatcha smokin, dumbass?
Recordings indicate Babbitt was actually trying to stop the people breaking the windows, which would fit in with her military security background. Sullivan who filmed the melee we know was in the pay of the media and was actually trying to egg on the attackers. If the security staffer with the gun was in on the egged on riot, too, akin to Sullivan and his companion or companions, there may be a motive for killing Babbitt rather than it just being defense. Killing the one moderate person trying to stop the rowdy crowd would be considered useful, even necessary, to anyone not interested in quelling violence but rather, interested in exploiting it. This might be far fetched but then, we are living in a country where almost the entire media can’t even correctly identify the sex of people they report on, because they are in lockstep with evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.