Posted on 07/01/2021 6:34:46 PM PDT by blam
The unraveling of social cohesion has consequences. Once social cohesion unravels, the nation unravels.
My recent posts have focused on the systemic financial risks created by Federal Reserve policies that have elevated moral hazard (risks can be taken without consequence) and speculation to levels so extreme that they threaten the stability of the entire financial system.
These risks are well known, though largely ignored in the current speculative frenzy.
But there is another systemic risk which few if any see: the collapse of social cohesion.
President Carter was prescient in his understanding that a nation’s greatest strength is its social cohesion, a cohesion that America’s unprecedented wealth / income / power inequalities has undermined. Consider this excerpt from his 1981 Farewell Address:
“Our common vision of a free and just society is our greatest source of cohesion at home and strength abroad, greater even than the bounty of our material blessings.”
In other words, a nation’s strength flows not just from its material wealth but from its social cohesion–a term for something that is intangible but very real, something that doesn’t lend itself to quantification or tidy definitions.
Here is my definition:
Social cohesion is the glue binding the social order; it is the willingness of the citizenry to sacrifice individual gains for the common good.
Social cohesion is the result of the citizenry sharing a common purpose and identity and working toward the common good even at personal cost. Social cohesion arises from a national identity based on shared values and sacrifices.
To maintain social cohesion, opportunities to better their circumstances must be open to all (the social contract of social mobility) and sacrifices must be shared by the entire citizenry. If the privileged elites evade their share of sacrifice, social cohesion is lost and the entire social order unravels.
The glue binding the privileged elites to shared sacrifice is civic virtue, a moral code that demands elites devote a greater share of their own resources to the public good in exchange for their political and financial power.
Though no one dares confess this publicly, America is now a moral cesspool. As a result, the moral legitimacy of the nation’s leadership has been lost. Every nook and cranny of institutionalized America is dominated by self-interest, and much of the economy is controlled by profiteering monopolies and cartels which wield far more political power than the citizenry.
Civic virtue has been lost. What remains is elite self-interest masquerading as civic virtue.
In his Farewell Address, President Carter explained that “The national interest is not always the sum of all our single or special interests. We are all Americans together, and we must not forget that the common good is our common interest and our individual responsibility.”
Social cohesion, civic virtue and moral legitimacy are the foundation of every society, but they are especially important in composite states.
America is a composite state, composed of individuals holding a wide range of regional, ethnic, religious and class-based identities. The national identity is only one ingredient in a bubbling stew of local, state and regional identities, ethnic, cultural and religious identities, educational/alumni, professional and tradecraft identities, and elusive but consequential class-based identities.
Composite states are intrinsically trickier to rule, as there is no ethnic or cultural identity that unifies the populace. Lacking a national identity that supersedes all other identities, composite states must tread carefully to avoid fracturing into competing regional, ethnic or cultural identities.
Composite states must establish a purpose-based identity that is understood to demand shared sacrifice, especially in crisis. In the U.S., the national purpose has been redefined by the needs of the era, but never straying too far from these core unifying goals: defending the civil liberties of the citizenry from state interference, defending the nation from external aggressors, and serving the common good by limiting the power of special interests and privileged elites.
We’ve failed to limit the power of privileged elites, failed to demand greater sacrifices of the wealthy in exchange for power, and so the moral legitimacy of the regime has been lost. And with the ascendance of self-interest and the elite’s abandonment of sacrifice, social cohesion has been lost.
This loss is reflected in the bitter partisanship, the increasingly Orwellian attempts to control the mainstream and social media narratives, the debauchery of “expertise” as dueling “experts” vie for control, the fraying of social discourse, the substitution of virtue-signaling for actual civic virtue, the institutionalization of white-collar crime (collusion, fraud, embezzlement, etc.), the increasing reliance on Bread and Circuses (stimulus, Universal Basic Income) as real opportunity dissipates, and the troubling rise in shootings, crime, random violence and plummeting marriage and birth rates.
The unraveling of social cohesion has consequences. Once social cohesion unravels, the nation unravels.
What’s the solution? At the national level, all that has been lost will have to be restored: civic virtue, moral legitimacy, the social contract of opportunity, shared sacrifice that falls most heavily on the wealthiest and most powerful, and a renewed national purpose centered on serving the common good.
Is such a restoration of moral legitimacy and shared purpose even possible? No one knows. If history is any guide, such a renewal is only possible after the empire of rampant self-interest implodes.
So what do we do in the meantime? Nurture our own social cohesion by living purposefully and sharing sacrifices and bounties with those we trust and admire–those in the lifeboat we chose to join.
It’s why the Great Jubilee was instituted by God, to prevent well-to-do Israelites permanently being separated.
I say certain powers are hoping for ethnic cleansing. Given how successful the US has actually been in assimilating many people from many lands over many decades, it would normally be very difficult to get Americans to turn on each other in a true Rwanda-style bloodbath.
But, if you can tear town the social cohesion enough, then your neighbor will happily come over and kill your entire family.
Another solid article by Charles Hugh Smith—he is one of the smartest folks in the room.
Our (western civilization) problems are deeply systemic late empire problems—and homo sapiens still has proven totally incapable of solving large scale systemic problems.
Our elites have gone insane because they know that their days of power and luxury are short—and they are panicking and have given up any pretense of long term thinking.
Interesting read.
I’m well aware that China, and “globalists” use our free media to destroy out social construct- for their, and the media’s, profit.
They also support prison gangs in their expansion of power over the populace.
A more serious problem than the author addresses.
S.I Hayakawa has an excellent chapter. “The Language of Social Cohesion”, in his classic book, “Language in Thought and Action.”
It is well worth one’s time & money to locate and purchase a copy.
We’re either living in the final days of the USA (and likely the West in general), or “The Final Days.”
Time will tell.
Breaking the social cohesion is the whole point of flooding the country with foreigners.
They will get a good war going to fix this problem
But of all the possible symptoms which one could cite - Wokeness and the attempt to sow Black/White enmity, illegal immigration and the resultant dilution of voting rights, etc. - to focus solely on the growing wealth of the top 0.1% is madness.
Insofar as the 0.1% make money due to Crony Capitalism, they are a fair target. But aside from that, promoting social envy because some market actors can accumulate more wealth than others is despicable.
Regards,
Thank you for posting this!
"Insofar as the 0.1% make money due to Crony Capitalism, they are a fair target. But aside from that, promoting social envy because some market actors can accumulate more wealth than others is despicable."
I agree completely.
“But of all the possible symptoms which one could cite - Wokeness and the attempt to sow Black/White enmity, illegal immigration and the resultant dilution of voting rights, etc. - to focus solely on the growing wealth of the top 0.1% is madness.”
Totally agree. Great income disparity has always existed and if we’re wise we will always aloow to exist and even encourage as long as it’s merit based and not the result of criminal behavior.
The author is endulging in a bit of virtue signaling and is falling for the leftist propaganda and language.
He’s equating “justice’ with equality of outcome as opposed to the idea what you get should be commensurate with what you put in in terms of efforts and talent.
He also pushes sacrifice a lot. But he never defines what he means by it or how that sacrifice should come about. Reading between the lines, I think he believes that sacrifice should be imposed on some people. That’s not sacrifice that’s punishment.
True sacrifice is a voluntary decision to forego of some short happiness in the belief that it will result in greater happiness in the long term.
Was at a funeral yesterday, and as the cortege was getting ready to depart from the church, a group of kids drove by and purposefully rudely yelled “wooo-hoooo” from their passing car.
What sort of person does this, and what sort of person raises their kids to think this is ok to do?
Captain Obvious quotes Carter. I guarantee that Carter did not say those words meaning anything that would agree with what posters on FreeRepublic think.
Karl Marx couldn’t have put it better.
At best, this article is imprecise - it is the willingness of the citizenry to defer short-term gains and accept delayed gratification that supports the so-called “common good”. Even if these actions benefit an individual tremendously in the long run, they also benefit society - as that individual’s focus changes from smoking pot or robbing a liquor store today to studying medicine or building a commercial property for tomorrow.
In a heterogeneous society, there can be no common good - but here can be common benefit from a system that allows all to be rewarded for efforts to better themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.