Posted on 06/18/2021 8:25:33 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Our team frantically worked around the clock to rebuild our website from scratch while utilizing servers around the world at great expense to our AFLDS team.
We were forced to take immediate action because we will never allow Jeff Bezos and Amazon to censor us from speaking freely about medical treatments, medical studies, individual liberty, or challenging the government narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.
If you would like to help these courageous doctors in their efforts to share the truth and to maintain their website you can donate here
Amazon’s motives are suspect, as they are closely aligned with the Biden Administration due to massive government contracts. These contracts are worth billions, yet Amazon pays almost no corporate taxes.
Jeff Bezos and Amazon cannot argue with our scientific data and facts, so they would rather delete us entirely. We have already been blacklisted on social media, and cannot host videos on YouTube. We must build our own internet servers that cannot be silenced by Big Tech, Big Pharma, or Big Government
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
That’s a constitutional violation.
While hate speech, unfortunately, is a legalized concept, “misinformation” is NOT and IS PROTECTED by constitutional rights.
Amazon forcing the site down is a violation of constitutional rights.
Sue them into oblivion.
Oh get off of it. It’s one lady from Africa and that stuff is part of the culture and beliefs where she’s from.
Well it’s fine that they went with wordpress open source CMS but they still have amazon & google tech running https://builtwith.com/?https%3a%2f%2famericasfrontlinedoctors.org%2f
I have seen Frontline Doctors presentations.
They have advocated use of HCQ and Ivermectin. Which the CDC said were ineffective and not approved for Covid19.
But the CDC gave no alternative treatment and said we had to wait for the “vaccine”.
People stayed home and either got well or got sicker and were taken to the hospital with advanced COVID19 and many died.
So what the CDC and Fouci did is indefensible.
Both HCQ and especially Ivermectin have been shown to have great benefit in early treatment.
So who is the criminal in this?
There is more to a rational discussion of this than what I stated.
I blame this insanity on arrogant Bureaucraps and politicians’ political agenda.
(not lizard men and other nonsense)
It’s much easier to attack someone’s character than actually dispute the evidence that they present. It’s a typical leftist tactic. The work that those docs are doing is backed up by evidence all over the world, but for some reason medical professionals feel threatened by them apparently, and are trying desperately to discredit them any way they can. Ivermectin and hcq work in certain. Cases, yet for some reason, medical professionals don’t want folks to know about it so they paint the whole group at that website as wackos who beleive In Alien sex. Pretty disgenius to do that, but as mentioned, it’s far easier to do that than to disprove the claim that those docs have saved countless lives using nothing g but ivermectin Or hcq
[[But the CDC gave no alternative treatment and said we had to wait for the “vaccine”.
People stayed home and either got well or got sicker and were taken to the hospital with advanced COVID19 and many died.
So what the CDC and Fouci did is indefensible.]]
Exactly, and some here on fr recommend doing nothing too, when there is a very real chance that nearly harmless meds could infacf save .ives. it’s a heck of a lot better tha. Doing nothing g and waiting. It certainly ly wouldn’t hurt. If it helps, then I don’t see what the problem is, if It ends up not working, at least it was an attempt to help rather tha. Telling the person to go home and hope they don’t die fro the virus
The opposition to somehting that could be used safely in addition to traditional medicine protocols is just weird. Wo Der why they feel so threatened by folks doing everything g they can, along with traditional treatments, to try to beat what could be a deadly virus?
Leftists usually are.
It’s no fun when you can’t broad brush an entire group of people.
And ever notice how stridently they object when someone does it to them?
The usual *Do as I say, not as I do* control freakishness of lefties.
Isn’t it interesting that the pro-vaxxers objected so much to trials of HCQ and Ivermectin and yet have no problem experimenting on the population in general with a vaccine technology that has never been shown to work as of yet?
Just another reason to be suspicious of this injection.
Heard Amazon stopped selling NAC, a totally safe OTC supplement that is effective (amongst other supplements and vitamins) against Covid-19.
Well said.
I won’t take it. I’ve been exposed to Covid19, might have had a very mild case when the first outbreak took place. I was taking some remedies at that time.
Was exposed later, did not get sick. I will rely on my own immune process. The governor of Texas has stated many times it is totally voluntary.
If the ever try to force me, I will refuse.
Yes and top down dictates coming from central government or statements from the WHO, fall quickly on a deaf ear.
They can put it where it does not shine.
I think this crap is about over. It took the public getting so sick of it to tell “leaders” NO MORE.
It is just not the nature of US citizen and more especially Texans to accept dictatorial rule.
“Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may.” -Sam Houston
Question doc: if hcq and ivermectin help in certain cases, and there is evidence worldwide that it does, despite the lefts feverish agenda to discredit it for some odd reason, and given how safe the meds are, with decades of proven safety for most Individuals, why wouldn’t a doctor want to try it in adDITION TO, traditional medicine being used to now treat covid? Why wouldn’t doctors want to give them in addition to treatmentz now being used to treat the covid? Why wouldn’t doctors want to use every possible means within reason to try to save people’s lives? And don’t say ‘because they are unproven’ because the medicines that the establishment are scramb,ing to get approved to treat covid are unproven for covid treatment too.
Why wouldn’t docs want to try complimentary treatments at the same time? ‘Go home and do nothing but take aspirin if you start to feel bad seems like horrible advice whe there are medicines that ery well could turn the virus around if given early enough. Why the massive obsessive medical opposition to these drugs?
If they don’t work, the so be it, at .east a person will have tried everything possible that they are aware of to try to save their own .ives, and at nearly zero risk too, but if they do work, And there is a large body of anecdotal evidence that they do work, all over the world, again, despite the lefts incessant denials, then all the better, right? No? If no, then why not? Why the reluctance to try everything possible, safely, under doctors supervision of course, to try to save people’s lives?
Seems,like liberals are vehemently opposed to we the people’s ‘right to try’
[[Isn’t it interesting that the pro-vaxxers objected so much to trials of HCQ and Ivermectin and yet have no problem experimenting on the population in general with a vaccine technology that has never been shown to work as of yet?]]
1000% exactly. Their opposition to the right to try medicines that have a large body of anecdotal evidence to support the idea that they are infzct life savers in certain circumstances, is truly bizarre behavior for a profession that advocates ‘doing no harm to their patients. Hcq and ivermectin have a very ,ong history of being safe and effective medicines, far safer I fact than many over the counter meds on shelves today. It is very suspicious that doctors wouldn’t, in light of zl, th3 anecdotal evidence pouring in weekly, support tryi g everything possible, in Addition to, the new unproven meds they are giving folks now, to try to save a person’s life. What possible reason could they have for trying to denounce hcq and ivermectin so vehemently? It s very odd indeed.
Bezos is hypocritical totalitarian leeching scum.
Texas Fossil wrote: “I have seen Frontline Doctors presentations. They have advocated use of HCQ and Ivermectin. Which the CDC said were ineffective and not approved for Covid19. But the CDC gave no alternative treatment and said we had to wait for the “vaccine”. People stayed home and either got well or got sicker and were taken to the hospital with advanced COVID19 and many died. So what the CDC and Fouci did is indefensible.”
Advocating ineffective and potentially dangerous drugs is indefensible. The AFLD encourages people to use ineffective and potentially dangerous drugs instead of the safe and effective vaccines. That is indefensible.
There is no credible study (peer reviewed, double blind, published in reputable medical journal) that establishes the effectiveness of these drugs.
Are you a doctor?
I’m not a doctor either.
BUT
My 95 year old father was diagnosed with Covid19 in December. My local doctor prescribed Ivermectin, Heavy D-3, Zinc and Loratadine (OTC). Ivermectin 3-X per day for 3 days. On day 3-4 he was totally symptom free. He was very sick and had a pacemaker, 15-20 years ago he had Quadruple heart bypass surgery and had Pick’s disease for ~6 years.
He did die in March, but NOT from Covid19. And he died at home in his own bed. He was a great man. A WWII Vet and as independent as they come. He worked for himself all his life. He chaffed at Bureaucrap.
Don’t try to tell me some crap that it does not work.
It has worked in Central and South America and in India. Anyone trying to convince people otherwise is flogging a dead horse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.