Victoria’s Secret Ditches Its ‘Angels’ Models For Megan Rapinoe And Transgender Models

The Mix ^ | 6/17/2021 | Erin Perri

[doc11355]

Go woke; go broke...

[z3n]

Victor/Victoria’s secret

[vespa300]

Just what I want to see. Caitlyn Jenner in panties. Well, actually, I’d rather see that then Rosie Odonnell or Joy Behar in panties. Just trying to find a silver lining.......

[Governor Dinwiddie]

16: "Young women don't need lingerie. They are sexy in fleece jackets and flannel."

Amen! That's the FReeeper Word of Wisdom for the day!

And old gals need not fret. A feminine woman with a Godly and kind personality wrapped in fleece and flannel works too!

[Brooklyn Attitude]

Revised headline: Victoria’s Secret ditches “Angels” models for devils.

[howlinhound]

There’s not enough Viagra or alcohol in the world to make me even look at that twice!

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

“..a Soviet Fashion Show....”

I remember that old advertisement on TV. What a hoot!

[BradyLS]

“Evenink vear!”

[tbw2]

How transgenderism erases women.

[Pollard]

That’s a man btw.

[tbw2]

Is that real?

[tbw2]

As if men want to buy fashion products worn by butch lesbians. Or make their female partners look like one.

[nickcarraway]

Posted here: Megan Rapinoe and Priyanka Chopra Join Victoria’s Secret Rebrand

[entropy12]

[SamAdams76]

The one in the middle had me fooled. Until I saw the legs.

[nickcarraway]

Actually, that wasn't the first: Megan Rapinoe and Priyanka Chopra Join Victoria’s Secret Rebrand

[algore]

In Sweden per legislation passed in 1972, to undergo a sex change operation a person must be over 18-years-old, a citizen, be sterilized and unmarried.

https://www.thelocal.se/20120112/38466/

don’t know if it was repealed.

I wonder what would happen if such a bill were introduced here ?

[MissEdie]

Um no- I do NOT want to look like a man. Sorry, I just want a good quality bra that keeps my girls comfy and supported.

[ResponseAbility]

****Now Victoria’s Secret will resemble a Soviet Fashion Show...****

“Svimvear, verrry nice.”

[Fungi]

Another reason for Deut. 22:5
“The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”