Posted on 06/16/2021 12:29:47 PM PDT by karpov
Karl Marx is a common fixture on college course syllabi. From English to sociology to philosophy, the German socialist’s writings are explained, analyzed, and dissected. I find myself, a teacher of modern social theory, often explaining the nuances of Marxist concepts like “commodity fetishism” and “species being” to students. But there is one thing you will not find on many of these syllabi: a thorough critique of Marx’s ideas.
In many courses, you will find Marxist theory as a sort of taken-for-granted way of analyzing the social world. The anthology I use for my own courses, Lemert’s Social Theory: Classic and Multicultural Readings, presents about 50 pages of Marx’s writings and some from Engels, but not a single selection offering a critical examination of Marxist ideas. At best, Marx’s ideas might be critiqued as not going far enough, or for focusing too much on class exploitation and not enough on other forms of repression.
That needs to change.
The first reason is simple: All ideas are subject to debate, criticism, and revision. Teaching students how to subject ideas to good-faith critique is a core mission of liberal arts education. Marx relied on many ideas that can be challenged such as the labor theory of value, the idea that there is no human nature beyond historical circumstance and economic system, and the idea that societies naturally evolve bitter class divisions.
By identifying a philosopher’s key ideas, students can learn to critique political arguments of any stripe. Higher education should not be a church of true believers. The college experience should nurture skepticism.
The second reason to include critiques of Marxist ideas is that socialist governments have an incredibly poor record and students need to know about it.
(Excerpt) Read more at jamesgmartin.center ...
100 million murdered , billions enslaved and terrorized. I guess you could call that poor.
All socialist doctrines claim to be “democratic”, but the actual connection to democracy is only applied one time - by the near-unanimous consent of the majority, then it cannot ever be questioned again.
One man - one vote - one way - one time.
The election is very deftly steered so a “democratic” board is elected to power, then never again challenged. Sounds about what has happened in that territory once know as “The United States of America” in the 2018 and 2020 elections, which were not honest, open and transparent elections, but an orgy of fake voter registrations, curious algorithms of counting the ballots, and simply manufacturing facsimiles of ballots already pre-marked, and introduced into the ballot counting process under cover of night, untouched by human hands up to that point.
Machine politics taken to its ultimate level.
some field trips appear in order...
Only stupid people fall for Marxism. This says all you need to know about the education profession.
If we just Required all Advanced Degree Students in Universities nationwide to spend 90 consecutive days in a Utopian Socialist Paradise like Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, the problem would go away. In fact maybe it should be Required Before Enrollment Acceptance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.