Posted on 06/11/2021 8:16:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Update (2000ET): The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Thursday that it will convene an "emergency meeting" of its advisers on June 18th to discuss rare but higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.
The new details about myocarditis and pericarditis emerged first in presentations to a panel of independent advisers for the Food and Drug Administration, who are meeting Thursday to discuss how the regulator should approach emergency use authorization for using COVID-19 vaccines in younger children.
As CBS reports, the CDC previously disclosed that reports of heart inflammation were detected mostly in younger men and teenage boys following their second dose, and that there was a "higher number of observed than expected" cases in 16- to 24-year-olds. Last month, the CDC urged providers to "ask about prior COVID-19 vaccination" in patients with symptoms of heart inflammation.
We'll leave the judgment up to someone far more qualified...
YOU STUPID, STUPID STUPIDS.
This was so predictable. pic.twitter.com/oHKFgR9vF4 — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Congrats you fuckwits you are about to destroy confidence in ALL vaccines and ALL public health measures for a generation. — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Does anyone else not find it odd that after discovering 800 cases in the VAERS database the "emergency" meeting is in 7 days? ... and in the meantime, every public health authority figure is encouraging parents to get their young children vaccinated?
* * *
As The Epoch Times' Zachary Stieber detailed earlier, Federal authorities have received over 800 reports of heart inflammation in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine, a health official said Thursday.
The reports of myocarditis or pericarditis were submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a passive reporting system run jointly by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration, through May 31.
The bulk of the reports described heart inflammation appearing after the second of two doses of either the Pfizer of Moderna vaccines, both of which utilize messenger RNA technology.
Authorities stress that anybody can submit reports through the reporting system but authorities have already verified that 226 of the reports meet the CDC’s working case definition, Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a deputy director at the agency, said during a presentation of the data. Followup and review are in progress for the rest.
Of the 285 case reports for which the disposition was known at the time of the review, 270 patients had been discharged and 15 were still hospitalized, officials said. Myocarditis typically requires hospital care. No deaths were reported.
A slide on myocarditis reports post-COVID-19 vaccination is shown during the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting on June 10, 2021. (FDA/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
The CDC announced last month that it was investigating reports of heart inflammation in teenagers and young adults who received a COVID-19 vaccine, though it took no definitive action besides saying it would continue reviewing case data.
An advisory committee to the agency, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said in a little-noticed update published dated May 24 and published on June 1 that data from VAERS showed that in the 30 days following the second dose of mRNA vaccinations, “there was a higher number of observed than expected myocarditis/pericarditis cases in 16–24-year-olds.”
Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, an active reporting system that relies on nine healthcare organizations in seven states, did not show higher than expected cases, it added.
“However, analyses suggest that these data need to be carefully followed as more persons in younger age groups are vaccinated,” the advisory committee’s vaccine safety workgroup said in its report.
Israel’s Health Ministry said that same day that it found 275 cases of heart inflammation among the more than 5 million people in the country who received a vaccine between December 2020 and May. An Israeli study found “a probable link” between receiving the second dose of the Pfizer jab “and the appearance of myocarditis among men aged 16 to 30,” the ministry said.
Shimabukuro said the U.S. passive surveillance data “are consistent with the surveillance data that emerged from Israel.”
The figures are also consistent with other case reports and data from the Department of Defense.
The vast majority of the U.S. reports deal with male patients. Approximately 300 preliminary reports indicated the patients suffered chest pain, with nearly as many having elevated cardiac enzymes.
Family members watch as a 12-year-old is inoculated with Pfizer’s vaccine against COVID-19 at Dekalb Pediatric Center in Decatur, Ga., on May 11, 2021. (Chris Aluka Berry/Reuters)
A case report examining myocarditis in seven adolescents following vaccination with Pfizer’s jab, published in Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, this month, said all seven developed the inflammation within 4 days of receiving the second dose, did not have evidence of COVID-19 infection, and did not meet the criteria for MIS-C, a rare disease.
The seven males, between the ages of 14 and 19, all required hospital care but each was eventually discharged.
Authors, who did not respond to requests for comment, said no link has been established between the vaccines and myocarditis and that the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks. But they also urged healthcare workers “to consider myocarditis in the evaluation of adolescents and young adults who develop chest pain after COVID-19 vaccination.”
A commentary on the study published in the same journal, said “there are some concerns regarding this case series that might suggest a causal relationship and therefore warrant further analysis through established surveillance systems.”
“First, the consistent timing of symptoms in these seven cases after the second vaccination suggests a uniform biological process. Second, the similarities in clinical findings and laboratory characteristics in this series suggest a common etiology. Finally, these cases occurred in the context of a dearth of circulation of common respiratory viruses known to be associated with myocarditis, and thorough diagnostic evaluations did not identify infectious etiologies,” they added.
The expected number of myocarditis/pericarditis cases in those aged 16 or 17, based on background incidence rates and the number of doses administered to that population through May 31, is between two and 19. But based on the VAERS reports, the number is 79.
Likewise, the expected number for cases among young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 is eight to 83. The number based on the reports is 196.
“In the 16- to 17 year-olds and the 18- to 24-year-olds, the observed reports are exceeding the expected based on the known background rates that are published in literature,” Shimabukuro told members of a Food and Drug Administration vaccine advisory committee in the meeting on Thursday, though he cautioned that not all the reports will “turn out to be true myocarditis/pericarditis reports.”
“Of note, of these 528 reports after second dose with symptom onset within 30 days, over half of them were in these younger age groups, 12–24 years old, whereas roughly 9 percent of total doses administered were in those age groups, so we “clearly have an imbalance there,” he added later.
A slide on myocarditis reports post-COVID-19 vaccination is shown during the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting on June 10, 2021. (FDA/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which comes from nine healthcare groups that have collectively administered over 8.8 million doses—only some 284,000 of those have been given to 12- to 17-year-olds—did not indicate safety concerns, with just 60 myocarditis or pericarditis events reported through May 29, the doctor continued.
A Food and Drug Administration surveillance system, the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which utilizes claims data from CVS and two other partners, has detected 99 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis in the 42 days following vaccination among some 3.1 million shots given to people between the ages of 12 and 64, the panel was told earlier by an official from the drug regulating agency.
Another 1,260 were reported in people 65 or older through claims data from Medicare claims data.
Neither number raised safety signals, Steve Anderson, director of the FDA’s Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology said.
Dr. Cody Meissner, chief of the Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease at the Tufts Children’s Hospital, and a member of the panel that heard from Shimabukuro and others, said after the presentations that he was “struck by the fact” that myocarditis “occurs more commonly after the second dose.”
“It’s a pretty specific interval of time, it’s primarily after the mRNA vaccines as far as we know, we know that the consistent age, there’s a lack of alternative explanations even though these patients have been pretty well worked up, and it’s a widespread occurrence because, as you said, Israel has found a pretty similar situation,” he said during the meeting.
He asked Shimabukuro about the rates of blood clots seen in women between the ages of 30 and 49 after vaccination—most of the clots appeared in that population after getting a Johnson & Johnson shot, though officials ultimately lifted a pause, saying the benefits outweighed the risks—and to restate the rate of incidence of myocarditis in adolescents after a jab.
Shimabukuro said that in contrast with the clotting situation, when data showed “strong evidence of a causal relationship fairly early on,” further study is needed on heart inflammation.
“At this point, I think we’re still learning about the rates of myocarditis and pericarditis. We continue to collect more information both in VAERS and continue to get more information in VSD, and I think as gather more information we’ll begin to get a better idea of the post-vaccination rates and hopefully will be able to get more detailed information by age group,” he said.
“It’s still early,” he added, noting that authorization for a vaccine for 12- to -15-year-olds didn’t come until mid-May while immunization of older adolescents largely came later than shots for adults.
“I believe that we will ultimately have sufficient information to answer those questions,” he said.
A general view of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta, Ga., on Sept. 30, 2014. (Tami Chappell/Reuters)
Another panel member, Dr. Jay Portnoy, director of the Division of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology at Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics, asked for a comparison between the adverse events in vaccinated versus unvaccinated persons, saying if the adverse event rate was lower in those who are vaccinated, then it would still be worth getting a jab.
Shimabukuro said a risk-benefit assessment would be provided by the CDC’s advisory panel, known as ACIP, on vaccines during a meeting next week.
A CDC spokeswoman also referenced the upcoming meeting, which will take place on June 18, after saying reports of myocarditis remain rare, given that over 300 million doses have been administered in the United States.
“Given the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered, these reports are rare. More than 18 million people between ages 12-24 have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine in the United States,” she told The Epoch Times via email.
“CDC continues to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for everyone 12 years and older. Getting vaccinated is the best way to help protect yourself and your family from COVID-19.”
A Pfizer spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that the company is aware of federal data indicating “rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis, predominantly in male adolescents and young adults, after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.” It noted that federal officials have not concluded that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cause either condition, before expressing support for an assessment of suspected adverse events.
“With a vast number of people vaccinated to date, the benefit risk profile of our vaccine remains positive,” the spokesperson added.
Moderna did not return an inquiry.
Dr. Monica Gandhi, professor of medicine and associate chief at the University of California, San Francisco, told The Epoch Times in an email that in light of the increased risk of myocarditis above expected rates among young people, especially after the second dose, parents should keep a close eye out for when guidance is issued by federal authorities.
“Possibilities include only vaccinating children without prior infection as there is an association between prior COVID and this adverse effect; giving 1 dose instead of 2 below the age of 20; addressing the dosage of the vaccine (currently at 30 micrograms down to the age of 12, which is the same dose as in adults); and extending the duration between doses 1 and 2 for younger people,” she said.
“I look forward to ACIP guidance on this over the next few weeks.”
However, to your point, does it seem that "medicine" seems surprised by the side-effects that are occurring?
In the procedures that you listed that never have 0.00% risk, these risk are known and have been in practice for decades, even centuries. Can the same be said about these vaccines?
Am I wrong to say that the scientists seem to be caught off-guard when a new side-effect pops up? What's the deal with the recent discussion of muscle tissue and the vaccine supposed to stay there or not? Is this something to be concerned about? Did I read correctly that they expected the vaccine to remain localized in the muscle tissue but it's spreading to the organs? If so, even if it's not a danger it was an unexpected surprise, yes?
Does it concern you that these "surprises" still seem to be popping up on something that was deemed to be safe? Does it put into question the credibility of a "safe" designation when new surprises keep popping up after something was deemed safe? Is it possible that there is a desire to stick to the "safe" designation because too much reputation is at stake to back away from it now?
-PJ
It isn’t just about casualties though, it’s about causing disease and hospitalization plus potential permanent heart damage and disability in the young <30. Whose Covid risk is less than the vaccine risk, which also needs to be calculated in number of lost life years not just life, because dying or being disable at 20 is not the same as if you were 55 or 70.
The backlash is much harsher when you kill/disable people’s children rather than their grandparents.
Fauci and his bureaucrats failed to make this calculation because he was/is a grandiose narcissist who wanted to make a place for himself in history as the man who eradicated covid. He wanted to be the next Salk.
In re a cult of anti Covid vaccine people, all I ask is that people be told the truth. Like with all the other vaccines.
“These are the actual risks of severe injury or death from Covid for you. These are the risks of severe injury or death from the mRNA vaccine for you.”
And then we should be allowed to decide. There should be no mask requirements or restrictions or denying work etc for those who decide the vaccine risk is not worth the reward. There should be no special lottery or gift cards or advantages of any kind from the government if they decide to get vaccinated.
and there shouldn’t be any discrimination...
I agree with your points. So far it has been mostly older folks have been vaccinated. The need for young people to be vaccinated must be evaluated thoroughly.
“Also, we want 5 year olds to take it.”
Hey, so how do you “evaluate carefully” how safe these vaccines are for children when
1) MRNA technology is completely new
2) There is no long term testing on vaccines.
You know what the science says about the long term safety of these new MRNA vaccines? Nothing. Nothing at all.
You see people talking about how hey look very few side effects and deaths after getting vaccinated. But these are the short term effects. What effects long term on various organs? We have no idea.
It’s like the people who say, hey I got the shot, it hurt a little, then I was fine. It’s safe. Oh really? Are you a time traveller? How surprised would you be if many years down the road we find out the unintended consequences of these shots.
The risk reward equation is going to be different for everyone.. But for children? En masse? Really??
At our local hospital, half the doctors are not vaccinated. Why? Concerns over the long term
Nice 95% confidence intervals.
Because SCIENCE!™
Don’t you have a cruise to go get sick on, troll?
Too late for all the people under 50 who already got the jab just because narcissistic Boomers insisted on “feeling” safe as they go off on yet ANOTHER self-indulgent cruise.
““Possibilities include only vaccinating children without prior infection as there is an association between prior COVID and this adverse effect; giving 1 dose instead of 2 below the age of 20; addressing the dosage of the vaccine (currently at 30 micrograms down to the age of 12, which is the sam”e dose as in adults); and extending the duration between doses 1 and 2 for younger people,” she said.”
In other words: “We’re watching the test rats (vaccinated people) to see what our next experiment should entail.”
No thanks!
Bkmk
YOU STUPID, STUPID STUPIDS.
This was so predictable. pic.twitter.com/oHKFgR9vF4 — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Congrats you fuckwits you are about to destroy confidence in ALL vaccines and ALL public health measures for a generation. — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Does anyone else not find it odd that after discovering 800 cases in the VAERS database the “emergency” meeting is in 7 days? ... and in the meantime, every public health authority figure is encouraging parents to get their young children vaccinated?
* * * Good enough for me * * *
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.