Posted on 06/11/2021 8:16:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
However, to your point, does it seem that "medicine" seems surprised by the side-effects that are occurring?
In the procedures that you listed that never have 0.00% risk, these risk are known and have been in practice for decades, even centuries. Can the same be said about these vaccines?
Am I wrong to say that the scientists seem to be caught off-guard when a new side-effect pops up? What's the deal with the recent discussion of muscle tissue and the vaccine supposed to stay there or not? Is this something to be concerned about? Did I read correctly that they expected the vaccine to remain localized in the muscle tissue but it's spreading to the organs? If so, even if it's not a danger it was an unexpected surprise, yes?
Does it concern you that these "surprises" still seem to be popping up on something that was deemed to be safe? Does it put into question the credibility of a "safe" designation when new surprises keep popping up after something was deemed safe? Is it possible that there is a desire to stick to the "safe" designation because too much reputation is at stake to back away from it now?
-PJ
It isn’t just about casualties though, it’s about causing disease and hospitalization plus potential permanent heart damage and disability in the young <30. Whose Covid risk is less than the vaccine risk, which also needs to be calculated in number of lost life years not just life, because dying or being disable at 20 is not the same as if you were 55 or 70.
The backlash is much harsher when you kill/disable people’s children rather than their grandparents.
Fauci and his bureaucrats failed to make this calculation because he was/is a grandiose narcissist who wanted to make a place for himself in history as the man who eradicated covid. He wanted to be the next Salk.
In re a cult of anti Covid vaccine people, all I ask is that people be told the truth. Like with all the other vaccines.
“These are the actual risks of severe injury or death from Covid for you. These are the risks of severe injury or death from the mRNA vaccine for you.”
And then we should be allowed to decide. There should be no mask requirements or restrictions or denying work etc for those who decide the vaccine risk is not worth the reward. There should be no special lottery or gift cards or advantages of any kind from the government if they decide to get vaccinated.
and there shouldn’t be any discrimination...
I agree with your points. So far it has been mostly older folks have been vaccinated. The need for young people to be vaccinated must be evaluated thoroughly.
“Also, we want 5 year olds to take it.”
Hey, so how do you “evaluate carefully” how safe these vaccines are for children when
1) MRNA technology is completely new
2) There is no long term testing on vaccines.
You know what the science says about the long term safety of these new MRNA vaccines? Nothing. Nothing at all.
You see people talking about how hey look very few side effects and deaths after getting vaccinated. But these are the short term effects. What effects long term on various organs? We have no idea.
It’s like the people who say, hey I got the shot, it hurt a little, then I was fine. It’s safe. Oh really? Are you a time traveller? How surprised would you be if many years down the road we find out the unintended consequences of these shots.
The risk reward equation is going to be different for everyone.. But for children? En masse? Really??
At our local hospital, half the doctors are not vaccinated. Why? Concerns over the long term
Nice 95% confidence intervals.
Because SCIENCE!™
Don’t you have a cruise to go get sick on, troll?
Too late for all the people under 50 who already got the jab just because narcissistic Boomers insisted on “feeling” safe as they go off on yet ANOTHER self-indulgent cruise.
““Possibilities include only vaccinating children without prior infection as there is an association between prior COVID and this adverse effect; giving 1 dose instead of 2 below the age of 20; addressing the dosage of the vaccine (currently at 30 micrograms down to the age of 12, which is the sam”e dose as in adults); and extending the duration between doses 1 and 2 for younger people,” she said.”
In other words: “We’re watching the test rats (vaccinated people) to see what our next experiment should entail.”
No thanks!
Bkmk
YOU STUPID, STUPID STUPIDS.
This was so predictable. pic.twitter.com/oHKFgR9vF4 — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Congrats you fuckwits you are about to destroy confidence in ALL vaccines and ALL public health measures for a generation. — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) June 10, 2021
Does anyone else not find it odd that after discovering 800 cases in the VAERS database the “emergency” meeting is in 7 days? ... and in the meantime, every public health authority figure is encouraging parents to get their young children vaccinated?
* * * Good enough for me * * *
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.