Posted on 05/29/2021 11:12:01 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin
Sidney Powell: We’re definitely in uncharted territory. There are cases where elections have been overturned. But there’s never been one at the presidential level where everybody will jump to point out. That doesn’t mean it can’t be done, though. There’s always the first case. And as far as I know, this is the first case of abject fraud and obtaining a coup of the United States of America. So, it’s going to have to be dealt with. It should be that he can simply be reinstated, that a new inauguration day is set. (cheers) And Biden is told to move out of the White House. And President Trump should be moved back in.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Oh really? You are living in a constitutional republic?
What's it called? Can I move there?
I have not lived in one since the election of LBJ on 11/22/63.
“June 1, eh...”
June 1st for the med beds or just something for the presenter?
The military leadership was subverted by Obama into some idiotic "Rainbow Warrior" force necessitating the purge of all true American patriots.
The new trans-military is also the enemy.
Am I now?
The court can determine the facts of the election, solely as to its LAWFULNESS.
Indeed courts can. But the Quo Warranto process is not the place for doing that. And there has been a marked lack of success getting the matter before any other court.
If criminal fraud is determined as a fact by the court, the election may be ruled UNLAWFUL, and NONE of the candidates on the ballots in question were elected or re-elected.
Wake me when that happens.
So, after June 1st, when this blogger says that “very interesting developments that even the general public will become aware of....” because bad people in the Deep State have been given that date as an ultimatum to give up any information to save their own lives - how long after June 1st do we wait until we can know if this man is telling the truth or not?
A week? A month? A year? A decade?
This is the med-bed guy?
Yes they did, the state legislatures spinelessly & legally delegated that down to the voters. Part of the mindless worship of mobocracy (democracy) we’ve had going on since 1912.
There's no other way, period.
If you try to seize power by some kind of military force, you will have destroyed 233 years of Constitutional government and that just will not stand.
Whatever corruption happened in the 2020 election needs to be exposed & rooted out, but you just won't "restore the Constitution" by overturning it with force.
Sorry about that.
Well... since JFK's dad paid Chicago Mayor Daily to steal the 1960 election for JFK, nothing important constitutionally happened on 11/22/63.
And Nixon's close stolen loss in 1960 may have helped elect him later, twice, in 1968 & 1972.
It's the pattern I'm expecting to see repeated with Donald Trump.
He is very upfront about the med beds. I think very quickly a lot of them will be rolled out.
Military statutes dictate that when there is evidence of a foreign actor or actors interfering in our election process they can act to restore the legitimate civilian govt. In fact it is their duty to do it.
Sure there is...
No. you have no direct evidence that the military has been "in control all along" since January 14.
Agreed. Unfortunately, there are some lovers of tyranny masquerading as conservatives in the current times.
What about using time travel to go back in time and redo the election challenges? Makes about as much sense as some of the other ideas floating around.
What do you think about this hypothesis that I posted in another thread:
-PJ
Actually, there is one Constitutional avenue to pursue that nobody has discussed yet. It is a longshot because it involved unique interpretations.It's Amendment 20 Section 3:
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.An argument can be made about the nature of "failed to qualify." What if this failure to qualify isn't discovered until after the President's term begins? Is that President still unqualified via the 20th amendment?
If so, and if both Biden and Harris are found to not have qualified under the 20th amendment, Congress can then "declar[e] who shall then act as President." Furthermore, Congress can determine "the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected," perhaps meaning a special election, a vote in the House (either by delegation or member), or even reinstalling the prior President.
However, this would involve SCOTUS to interpret that "fail to qualify" is permanent, and doesn't expire at the oath of office even though the election was provably stolen by the new President who would otherwise have failed to qualify if the theft had been uncovered sooner.
You might make a better case through the 9th and 10th amendments.I think the difference between 9-10 and 20 is that 9 and 10 are generalized statements of states rights while 20 is a specific procedure.
The question with the 9-10 approach is "then what?" If a state was denied a fair election due to bad-faith actors, then what? If a state can revoke certification, then what?
Part of the answer to "then what?" is the procedure in 20. If it is found that certification was based on falsified ballots, falsified counts of legitimate ballots, counts of illegitimately received ballots, etc., then we enter "failed to qualify" territory.
The question then becomes, must these failures of qualifications be discovered before the safe-harbor date for the Electoral College, be discovered before the Congressional count, or be discovered before the oath of office to be valid for the 20th amendment? If so, it rewards cover-up by any means by the very same bad-faith actors.
If it can be retroactively applied via the 20th amendment, then both Biden and Harris can be removed and Congress can appoint an interim President while a new President is chosen via a means established by Congress.
Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi will become acting President while Congress dithers over this. On the other hand, Pelosi would have to resign from Congress in order to succeed the Presidency. On the other other hand, Congress could retain Pelosi as Speaker if they act quickly to name a different acting President via the 20th amendment, declaring that the rules of succession don't apply in this case.
I hear this buzzing sound, moving from right to left... there it goes.
Just a passing fly.
You live in an unsanitary environment infested with flies.
Get a job, build a decent life for yourself.
I know what flies are attracted to.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.