As it should be. I get the idea of “public accommodation”. But as conservatives, we should have a great respect for property rights. So in the example below, either have the proper attire or go shop somewhere else.
As it should be. I get the idea of “public accommodation”. But as conservatives, we should have a great respect for property rights. So in the example below, either have the proper attire or go shop somewhere else.
But as conservatives, we should have a great respect for property rights.’
in this case, not really; the only reason they’re requiring the stupid face coverings is because the governor said to do so...pin them down, ask them why they’re harassing paying customers, and that’s the song and dance you get from them...
no shirt, no shoes, no service relates to culturally accepted norms that have been in place for generations; no shirt genrally means a dirty person in a clean environment, no shoes is a recipe for a lawsuit if a foot gets hurt, and no punk governor has ever made it a one size fits all mandate...can we say that about the face masks...?