Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

But as conservatives, we should have a great respect for property rights.’

in this case, not really; the only reason they’re requiring the stupid face coverings is because the governor said to do so...pin them down, ask them why they’re harassing paying customers, and that’s the song and dance you get from them...

no shirt, no shoes, no service relates to culturally accepted norms that have been in place for generations; no shirt genrally means a dirty person in a clean environment, no shoes is a recipe for a lawsuit if a foot gets hurt, and no punk governor has ever made it a one size fits all mandate...can we say that about the face masks...?


54 posted on 05/09/2021 5:32:21 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: IrishBrigade

As usual “follow the money”...liability issues...a businesses’ liability insurance company may be requiring masks for customers to protect employees. Congress failed to pass COVD-19 liability protections for businesses.

https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2020/09/covid19-raises-various-employment-practices-liability-insurance-considerations


58 posted on 05/09/2021 5:42:05 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson