Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
enVolve ^

Posted on 05/08/2021 4:27:30 PM PDT by A.M. Smith

A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs. We urge you to read and share this damning report.

There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.

You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.

(Excerpt) Read more at en-volve.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: adverseeffects; aliens; antivaxxers; boosterdr; cdctrolls; chinatrolls; chinavirusvaccine; conspiracynuts; covidvaccine; devolve; forcepeople; hcq; ignorebagtroll; ivermectin; liableforcoviddeath; moratorium; nofeedbagstroll; quacks; sheeple; sideeffects; vaxpushers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-470 next last
To: ransomnote
People who were vaccinated are becoming ill and can still die from Covid-19.

Just like the inflated numbers of Covid cases and deaths, you can bet the farm the are deflating the numbers of vaccine injury and deaths, too.

261 posted on 05/08/2021 10:47:25 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Oh OK, I suppose I could be wrong. Would anyone that had their mind changed please let me know?


262 posted on 05/08/2021 10:48:26 PM PDT by sageburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: bagster

I can’t read those, and I don’t believe that they were drawn and published by Jefferson himself.

(But they are certainly better in execution than what I see you publish.)


263 posted on 05/08/2021 10:52:51 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: sageburn

What do you think he SHOULD have done?

And do you know everything that he knew from his own advisors when this virus first came on the scene?


264 posted on 05/08/2021 10:54:16 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: sageburn
Lol, i agree, I’m not a toddler and i love nookie.


265 posted on 05/08/2021 10:55:47 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

You sound like all of the ‘cancel culture’ people.

If someone disagrees with you, they must be insulted, ridiculed and shut-up.

That seems a pretty leftist approach to me, so I guess I have your number, too.


266 posted on 05/08/2021 10:57:36 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
I can’t read those, and I don’t believe that they were drawn and published by Jefferson himself.

Oh, now they have to be written by Jefferson himself? Like as if all memes today are written by Trump himself? And you don't have to be able to 'read them' to get the point that 'memes' didn't just pop up yesterday and are a legitimate means of communicating ideas.

You are a dishonest broker, Jamestown. Learn to admit defeat and move on the the next battle.

(But they are certainly better in execution than what I see you publish.)

Didn't you just get done saying that you 'can't read those'? Now, all of a sudden, they are better executed than what I 'publish'?

I assume you can read mine. I try to make the letters big enough even for old ladies with bad peepers to read. The English seems appropriate.

You are a jumble of contradiction and inconsistency, Jamestown, and hard to follow.


267 posted on 05/08/2021 11:04:21 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
If someone disagrees with you, they must be insulted, ridiculed and shut-up.

Just the dumb ones.

It is the way of the pack.


268 posted on 05/08/2021 11:06:16 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
This article says the mnra technology was first tested in mice in 1990.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89998

269 posted on 05/08/2021 11:06:43 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Most of your ‘memes’ are just silly and self-congratulatory.

If you did one that was actually clever and had the capacity to influence intelligent people, I might pay attention.

Yes, the old ones are better executed - someone actually drew those pictures. Someone else made use of very primitive technology to have them reproduced in a published form.

All you do is point and click - copy stuff from movies or other pop culture sources, paste, and maybe do a little html.

You obviously have an agenda; I’ve never figured out exactly what it is, but I’ve never seen you post anything inspiring and sincere, from your own heart.


270 posted on 05/08/2021 11:14:07 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

You just want to argue.


271 posted on 05/08/2021 11:14:37 PM PDT by sageburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: bagster

I’ve seen more wisdom come out of a lot of so-called ‘dumb’ people than I’ve seen come out of you.

Good Night!


272 posted on 05/08/2021 11:16:54 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: sageburn

that sounds like the typical response of someone who doesn’t HAVE an argument.


273 posted on 05/08/2021 11:17:50 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

This article says the mnra technology was first tested in mice in 1990.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89998
~~~~~~~~~~~
THe technology upon which the mRNA ‘vaccines’ are based hails from 2005. Prior to 2005, the mRNA failed because the body’s immune system detected the ‘vaccine’ and defeated it as if it were a pathogen.
In 2005, there was what was then considered a ‘breakthrough’. They placed the mRNA within a lipid capsule that functioned like a mail pouch and ferried the ‘vaccine’ to the cells without detection by the body’s immune system.
So they got it into the cells, but they still couldn’t make it work because test animals develop the antibodies but then sicken/die when exposed to the virus.
At this point, the person discussing the topic in an article usually says this problem has not been addressed because little is known about t-cell immunity and there’s a piece of the puzzle missing.

This to me is a failed excuse - they can’t explain it because there’s a piece of the puzzle missing but we should trust it to vaccinate the whole world ASAP, when treatment protocols are available that are 85% effective. *SMH*

But, they have no research to show they found that piece, and suddenly we have mRNA vaccines and the risks, known and documented, are obscured and dismissed because it’s an ‘emergency’ based on fake numbers. It’s really a toxic scam.


274 posted on 05/08/2021 11:19:07 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Lol, you don’t have an argument, you just want to argue. Get a life...


275 posted on 05/08/2021 11:22:19 PM PDT by sageburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
If someone disagrees with you, they must be insulted, ridiculed and shut-up.

Nope, I reserve that behavior for those who are acting in bad faith.

If people are aiming above their head intellectually, but admit "hey, this is my best guess" or "hey, these are my sources" or say "gee, tell me more, that doesn't match what I've heard" , great.

But people who spout off stuff that they've already been told is false; or, who, upon being corrected, come up with another totally erroneous comeback which is also discredited, and act like "I answered back, so I WON!" or they are literally too stupid to know that they don't know, and STILL try to condescend, then they become fair game.

276 posted on 05/08/2021 11:27:06 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

277 posted on 05/08/2021 11:36:44 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
His a slice of history for you.

Adenoviral vectors are the new COVID-19 vaccine front-runners. Can they overcome their checkered past? (acs.org)

"CanSino Biologics, Johnson & Johnson, and the University of Oxford are all using genetically engineered common cold viruses to make COVID-19 vaccines. The technology is more than 30 years in the making, but it’s yet to yield an effective vaccine for humans"


278 posted on 05/09/2021 12:08:22 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

whether this is a trial run to set a precedent for something further down the road.
———————
I do believe we are, as you say, being “tested”, or set up to see how far they can go. Disease/ pandemics run in historical cycles, we have just entered this cycle....increasing into 2024. They were able to shut down the world economy over a virus with a 99.8 percent survival rate, imagine what they can achieve if a real killer emerges/ is unleashed? .....t.o.t.a.l control.


279 posted on 05/09/2021 12:25:03 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The odds of dying from covid is 1.8%
——————
False, the odds differ with age. The mean is less than .02 percent.


280 posted on 05/09/2021 12:29:30 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-470 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson