Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: New Judge Assigned to Democrats’ Maricopa County Case – Parties Have 10 Days to File Motions – Audit Continues!
GP ^ | April 26, 2021 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 04/26/2021 1:55:32 PM PDT by White Lives Matter

A new judge has been assigned to the Democrats’ Maricopa County case. The parties are now to take 10 days to describe to the judge what they think should take place.

Brahm Resnic in Arizona tweeted out moments ago:

.... Snip....

We don’t know much about the new judge, Judge Daniel Martin, at this time but he has been a judge in Arizona since 2007:

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Local News; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: arizona; bidenlovershatehoft; brahmresnic; danielmartin; democrats; electiontheft; fakewaypundit; hoftisapimp; joebiden; joehoft; maricopaaudit; maricopacounty; perkinscoie; trump; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: White Lives Matter
Yeah, this was obvious self sabotage by the Senate Republican's legal team.

Conflict of interest checks are a fundamental aspect of representation and this guy never should have been let on the Senate's team. .

On the other hand, the justification for recusal was pretty lame so it's obvious that Judge Coury wanted off this case in the worst sort of way. I think Coury did a basic gesture towards fairness when demanded a 1 milllion dollar bond for the emergency restraining order incorrectly assuming that the Democrats would pony up cash and shut down the audit before it had a chance to get started.

He got blindsided by their refusal to post bond and was shocked that the audit got rolling. After that, he was probably looking for any way out of the case. The only judges who wnat this case are the one who want to shut down the audit. For any one else than a dem operative Judge wanting to shut the door n the audit, this case is totally lose-lose.

41 posted on 04/26/2021 3:28:06 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BiglyCommentary

That will not work. No Dim lawyer would buck the fix.


42 posted on 04/26/2021 3:49:41 PM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yes the audit is continuing...but the new judge has ruled against the 10 day pause and has scheduled hearings to start tomorrow.


43 posted on 04/26/2021 3:50:52 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Gee. How convenient.


44 posted on 04/26/2021 3:52:38 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists are The Droplet of Sewage in a gallon of ultra-pure clean water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter
Why is it that Dems can use strategy like this to get a new Judge favorable to them and the Republicans can't do the same. Rhetorical question.
45 posted on 04/26/2021 3:53:18 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1
Yeah, this was obvious self sabotage by the Senate Republican's legal team.

How so? The person who had been an intern was added to the Democrat team.

46 posted on 04/26/2021 4:02:15 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The intern was on the legal team representing the Senate Republicans


47 posted on 04/26/2021 4:06:18 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

The only party that ever surrendered was the democrat party at Appomattox court house.

Try again.


48 posted on 04/26/2021 4:07:55 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

10 days? Should be able to find enough fraud, although I prefer they find all of it.


49 posted on 04/26/2021 4:08:54 PM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Roadrunner383

Or they just repeat the tactic until they get the judge they want.


50 posted on 04/26/2021 4:11:05 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1; All
The intern was on the legal team representing the Senate Republicans

I checked. You are correct.

There is some serious bad reporting on this case.

51 posted on 04/26/2021 4:25:59 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

OK then 13/40ths, sheesh.


52 posted on 04/26/2021 4:41:42 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

I believe the AZ attorney general says they will ignore the suit as a county judge does not have jurisdiction over a state. The arena is also a state owned building.


53 posted on 04/26/2021 5:41:06 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter

Apparently the demo hired a lawyer that worked for the judge within the last 5 years, creating a conflict of interest.


54 posted on 04/26/2021 5:45:05 PM PDT by MortMan (Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The Supreme court case is about separation of power. The Legislature claims, (and I believe correctly), that once the subpoena was deemed legal by the courts and the documents/equipment were delivered that the courts have no authority in dictating what and how the legislature can conduct the audit.

It also argues that persons and companies contracted by the legislature to perform the audit also have the same “speech and debate” immunity that the legislature has.

The Supreme Court refused to “stay” the audit and set specific dates for filing of arguments. They also agreed that the trial court judge was correct to not stay the audit once the Dems refused/failed to post the bond, (1 million dollars). The issue before them now is the accusations of voter identity/secrecy and security of the subpoenaed documents/equipment. The Legislature is arguing the separation of powers, (the court can not dictate how the Legislature conducts its business), and the speech and debate immunity when in session.

The trial court’s new judge has extended the time for pleadings in their case beyond the original timeline, and if he does not order the audit stopped, (which would immediately be appealed to the Supreme Court), then the audit will be finished before the case is fully briefed, argued and decided, at which point the case will be MOOT.

Possibly the new judge is going to do to the Dems what they did to Trump; dismiss it on technical grounds without ruling on the merits.


55 posted on 04/26/2021 7:37:38 PM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

This post is for #23 and #25. The judge recused himself because the defendant, Cyber Ninjas, hired a former clerk of the judge. It was not the Dems. This new lawyer was hired for the appeal to the Supreme Court against the trial judge and the Dem Plaintiffs. Since the judge was made a party to the Supreme Court case and he was associated with the new lawyer less than 5 years ago, the trial judge had to recuse himself.

The initial news reports were very confusing and until I read the filing in the Supreme Court it appeared that the Dems were the ones that hired the new attorney. The SC filing clearly list him as an attorney for Cyber Ninjas.


56 posted on 04/26/2021 7:46:32 PM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: usnavy_cop_retired

“Possibly the new judge is going to do to the Dems what they did to Trump; dismiss it on technical grounds without ruling on the merits.”

This is where we all throw our heads back and laugh.


57 posted on 04/26/2021 8:11:38 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

This is the argument that Schiff is making on the Judicial Watch lawsuit requesting the subpoenas issued to the phone carriers during the impeachment “investigation” in which they got phone call data for numerous Republicans including elected folks.

Schiff claims that the courts have no authority to order release of the subpoenas since they are the legislative property and the legislature can keep them “secret” or make them public as they see fit.

This line of argument appears to me to be valid based on separation of powers and the speech and debate article of the constitution. Possibly one of the people who had their data provided to Schiff by these subpoenas would have standing to sue, and potentially be able to win.

But in the AZ case there is no one that can sue, (standing), since the identity of the voter of an individual ballot can not be determined/identified.


58 posted on 04/27/2021 1:10:28 AM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson