earlier today with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures.
Fauci is a deep state swamper of the highest seniority!
Evil and money.
The media would say it’s all a conspiracy but if Fauci’s true involvement with Covid-19 were known he in sane world would be in jail at the very least.....
He’s been one of the most fraudulent and destructive bureaucrats in history...
How was fraudster able to fund anything? Isn’t it Congress that handles the money - he’s not part of Congress - how does he get his hands on the money??
Speaking of which, I’m currently at CVS pharmacy trying to get the Covid shot and what did they ask for? Why a photo ID! So to get a free Covid shot, the government demands a photo ID but NOT when you vote because that is racist and Jim Crow
We’ve known about this for a year now, why is it only coming up now?
Go Rand!
p
I don’t think Fauci likes Senator Paul.
Just a hunch, I have.
Why did Gates and Fauci present the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) to the Gates Foundation Event 201 in Oct. 2019 before we ever heard of Covid-19?
Why are Moderna’s competitor vaxs being called out?
Follow the $$$$$$$$$.
GOOD FREAKING GRIEF....WTF DIDN’T YOU DO THIS LAST YEAR??????
YOu PUBBIES ARE SO DAMN SLOW!!!
“We need to ask him why are we doing this in China but are (not) doing this in the US?”
++++++
If there was a Pulitzer Prize for the most under-reported story of the year this one would have been the winner the last 2 years in a row.
And you Senator Paul must answer why you turned-tail and voted to certify the election of a potato, as well as sanctioning unlimited voter fraud.
Oh, my. Perhaps the first thing we should ask is, did whoever wrote this have any formal training in English? This looks like a bad translation from Chinese.
I've already posted this several times, and I will post it again. The researchers at the Wuhan lab did NOT conduct gain of function studies. I read the paper that was used by the fearmongers making this claim (and would link it, but I didn't bookmark the paper at the time). What they did is this:
1) They had a characterized coronavirus in the lab. This virus was perfectly capable of infecting humans. What I mean by "characterized" is that they know how that specific virus attaches to cells and replicates inside them.
2) They collected coronavirus samples from a bat colony.
3) Since they did not know anything about the wild bat viruses, they opted to test a single protein from those viruses. Limiting their experiments to that one protein is a lot safer than throwing wild virus of unknown properties into experiments.
4) The one protein they tested was the spike protein which is responsible for virus attachment to cells.
5) They made several viruses in which they replaced the spike protein of the lab virus with a spike protein of a wild virus. They found that many of the lab viruses that contain wild spike proteins were able to attach to human cells.
6) This only showed that some wild bat coronaviruses have the potential to become human pathogens. It did not show that any of the wild viruses *are* human pathogens, because they only tested the spike proteins, not the complete viruses. It is possible for a virus to attach, but not to cause infection after it attaches.
This kind of research, in which a single component of unknown properties is introduced into a system that is otherwise characterized, is fairly routine and basic. Researchers do these kinds of experiments all the time.
This is from Moderna's SEC filing.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-20200630.htm
Key sentence from the "description of the business" section--
Since inception, we have incurred significant net losses. As of June 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.74 billion. We may continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. In addition, we anticipate that our expenses will increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities to support our platform research, drug discovery and clinical development, infrastructure and Research Engine and Early Development Engine, digital infrastructure, creation of a portfolio of intellectual property, expansion into global markets, and administrative support.
We do not expect to recognize significant revenue from sales of potential mRNA medicines unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our investigational medicines. If we seek to obtain regulatory approval for any of our investigational medicines, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses. Our investigational vaccine against the novel coronavirus (mRNA-1273), which is currently in clinical trials, has been developed rapidly to respond to the global COVID-19 pandemic. We are expending significant efforts to further the rapid development of this potential vaccine and expect to continue to do so over the next 12 months. These efforts have required and will continue to require the expenditure of significant funds and the establishment of significant worldwide infrastructure and partnerships.
= = = =
Not proof, of course, but "things that make you go Hmmmm"
What patents and conflicts of interest does Faux-Xi have?
Note, that as he's not publishing Federally-funed research as an author, but is a government official promoting policy, I don't think he has the same legal obligation to publish any conflicts of interest up front.
Rand is playing a role...like Sessions...serious ...but, what do I know except ....that it won’t happen?!
I Wish the good Senator my best.
How else was he supposed to get the scamdemic going?