Posted on 03/20/2021 3:04:26 PM PDT by inpajamas
A synopsis of world history paints a dark picture of humanity rife with mankind’s inhumanity. The weak have always been a prey and even the strong have fallen. The animal kingdom is a suitable allegory for what usually takes in the world: the strong and ruthless prevail. Indeed, for man himself is a beast, and so much more to the extent that conscience lacking. As it is written, "Man that is in honor, and understands not, is like the beasts that perish." -- Psalm 49:20. And again, "I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts." -- Ecclesiastes 3:18
Although wealth and power could be used to benefit humanity, and strength used to secure peace, to the contrary, and more often than not, both have been used to obtain more wealth and power at the expense of civilization. Power has in the past, and still today, is more often used as an oppressive force to conquer and subdue, to kill, spoil, and plunder. The tendency is, the more power is consolidated the more corruption prospers.
The other wonderment is why so often many citizens who are subject to corrupt rulers, who are obviously evil, tend to lend them support. It is a historic reality; most societies embrace bigger governments with more power ruled by corrupt leaders. More often, even when an opportunity arises to pursue freedom, many are willing to remain loyal, even unto death, to protect their despotic rulers and wear the chains of bondage. Tyrants who rule over subjugated citizenry are aware of this phenomenon; and count upon it. They are not alone. Globalist social engineers are also aware of human nature and use the same tactics of insecurity and fear to manipulate populations and cultures into becoming participants of their agendas.
Presently we live in a world is that is very quickly changing, and with change, the balance of world power among nations is shifting. The current shift of powers, however, is not completely driven by nations competing for global influence, it is in part being brought in by the design and manipulation of global social engineers, among whom you find the world's wealthiest men and international corporations.
These globalist change agents, who disregard history and the dangers posed by totalitarian systems of rule, embrace the idea of bringing all, the good, the bad, and the ugly, into a one world system of commerce and international order. However, in doing so, they overestimate their own power and influence to control and manipulate the rogue heads of the multi-headed Beast they are creating once each of those heads determines to exercise their own mind.
On the other hand, what the global elites have fatally discounted is the role of moral principles as an essential element in the foundation of world stability. This has been the case for Western hegemony in the past; that nations who embrace laws that empower individuals and observe human rights for all people, are the only safeguard against universal oppression and totalitarianism. These virtuous ideas have only found their way into a successful order on earth through the realization and acknowledgment of a living God as Creator and Law Giver.
The idea that all nations are equal and deserve equal power and an equal say in world affairs is a fallacy. All nations are not morally equal. All people are not morally equal. To believe that world stability can come about by achieving equality, without having regard to morality, is embracing a foolhardy proposition. Without the embrace of right moral values, any notion of peace, equality, or stability among nations is a pipe dream and a recipe for massive death.
But Western power has waned and at present world stability rests more upon interdependence of nations and compatible or shared interests. Even nations that despise and hate each other sell to, or buy from, one another. Virtually all nations depend upon the resources and revenues from trade ’partners’ to kept their countries afloat economically. But the marriage of nations in a global economic system is more like a shotgun wedding, except everyone is holding a gun to everyone else's head as well as his own and knows it. The current world system, because it has become corrupted is not sustainable. It is destined to fail.
American wealth has been exported to build and bring other nations into a global system which has given birth to new world powers. But what have these evil children grow into as they have become of age? They will kill those who gave them birth and brought them into the family so they can take the inheritance. In becoming a trade partner with China and making “deals’ with hostile nations, America became like a prostitute who picked up a serial killer.
US - Sino Relations: Where we are today and how we got here
The US, is in large, responsible for the rise and empowerment of China. To understand the history of how we got here, we can go back to a key figure responsible for opening the door of trade relations with China. The former US Secretary of State, Dr Henry Kissinger is that man. Over a decade ago during a speech at the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kissinger stated that the future of the United States and China "depends on our capability to create an international system never seen before". To this end, Kissinger said, "the US and China should dedicate themselves to building an international system of cooperation".
Kissinger stated the growing political and economic prominence of China was irreversible and China’s rise as a global power was inevitable; "unless Beijing and Washington can cooperate to create a new global order", he said, "it raises the specter of war." Quote:
"When friends and colleagues in the United States talk about the rise of China and the problems it presents to us, I say the rise is inevitable. There is nothing we can do to prevent it, there is nothing we should do to prevent it…..," he added, "When the center of gravity moves from one region to another, and another country becomes suddenly very powerful, what history teaches you is that conflict is inevitable. What we have to learn is that cooperation is essential"
There is, however, a problem with this “cooperation” which Kissinger himself had once noted when commenting on an international system for which peace is the highest priority;
"[That system he said, is ]….at the mercy of the most ruthless, since there [is] a maximum incentive to mollify the most aggressive state and to accept its demands, even when they [are] unreasonable." The inevitable result: "massive instability and insecurity."
Is not this where we have found ourselves today with China? Be careful who you empower, they may become your enemy or master, or someday, both. But does this detour the global social engineers? No, because they want a New World Order.
At the World Affairs Council Press Conference, held at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel on April 19th 1994" Kissinger stated,
[The New World Order] cannot happen without US participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions."
Kissinger’s call for a “new global order” orchestrated by the world’s most powerful nations is not a new ambition. His work as an architect of a world system spans decades as affirmed in an address before the General Assembly of the United Nations in October of 1975 when he stated,
"My country's history, Mr. President [U.N.], tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order."
How much difference is there in saying: “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth” - Genesis 11:4.
These things were spoken by Kissinger decades ago; so why are they important now? The fact that these ideas were expressed decades ago only serves to show that the current state of affairs is a product of strategies that have been at work for a long time and are on going. A one world government is not a new idea, it is a constant one.
And so at Babel they tried, and the whole earth was one people of one language and under universal rule, but the system was totalitarian. Destruction followed. Every government in world history which persuade global aspirations eventually ended in ruins and disappeared.
Peace is never the result of cooperation with hostile nations. Whatever peace the world has, or will ever know only comes by way of strength with guiding principles, not by an equilibrium of shared power, or by agreement upon common interests. World stability is dependent upon the power of a greater power, which, guided by good principles and values, exerts the proper degree of force as a counter weight to arrest hostile and aggressive forces of evil. Otherwise, the wicked prevail.
Biblical News Christians Jews
its so funny they put an “or” between them, like you have to pick one or the other
My my “The Editor” is long winded. Where is Humblegunner on the rare occasion we need him?
Blessings on you and yours, AW, but please, please do not invite humblegunner into our midst.
True, but in Kissinger’s mind it was a choice of one or the other, peace or war. He imagined he would help engineer a workable world system of nations. But the truth is probably more as you suggest, when all is said and done, both can be the product; which of course means the order will break down. The real question if both come to pass is, which will come first? Another possibility is a NWO could both come out of a war, and then later end in war. Whatever happens, it is a very dangerous world right now.
Once the USSR fell, it was not necessary to tie ourselves to China the way we did. Once the Soviet communists were defeated, we pushed Russia away and eagerly hopped into bed with the Chinese communists and we all know why. $$$ There rise was not inevitable, not to the extent we have seen. It all goes back to the decision no permanently normalize trade relations with them. again, $$$. The claim was that they thought that the sudden spread of Chinese prosperity would be the death of Chinese communism but it clearly was not. Just ask the Uyghurs.
You are absolutely right. China did not become like us, we became like them. A fatal mistake!
Well stated.
The New World Order is the dream created after WWII when the West was the uncontested dominant force in the world. The U.N. was going to be the basis for the world government. The West is no longer uncontested. China will be the dominant power. The rest of the world will be their Uyghurs. They were humiliated in the last century and will be eager to pay back those who humiliated them. They have no regard for the people “with big noses” as they call them. They will use the corrupt Westerners like Hunter Biden to overpower the West. These people would pimp their own mothers.
I agree with the lack of need of the “or” I see it more like NWO will only START with, WWIII
Absolutely. They don’t care about their own people; given the opportunity they would kill as many Westerners as they thought served them well and take great pleasure doing it. They are no more moral than Islamic extremists, just more calculated and careful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.