Posted on 02/07/2021 5:19:02 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
This sunnyklown's head is thick as a brick, eh, rl?
Enough said.
No, I was referring to the Detroit Gay Press "article" by Clara "Newsliarchick" Hendrickson.
She mentioned Shane Trejo to get in some smears from various sources.
Heh, I realized that at post #25 almost as soon as I clicked the “post” button...!
Look. I suspect that you, like many people have a good deal of skepticism and irritation with the Gateway Pundit.
I understand that completely, and even I roll my eyes now when I see an article from them with “bombshell” and all that.
But given that...this is not a bad piece of journalism by them, even with the all caps and exclamation points and such. It actually asks some very valid questions that real journalists should be asking.
Why don’t you take a good gander at the article and let us know what you think.
So they unloaded 61 boxes of tacos at 3:30 AM? WTF?
And make sure you watch Mike Lindell’s doc. He has more proof in one place than I’ve seen so far.
I find it strange that the weekend update section of the February 6, 2021 broadcast of Saturday Night Live mentioned Mike Lindell. They’re afraid that millions of people have seen his over 2 hour video. They tried to make fun of the length of the video.
Bkmk Rumble video
The election fraud is only real so long as we say it is. If we give up, it goes away.
They deny deny, shift explanations but the witnesses keep getting corroborated time and time again
Even if you arrest them, corrupt prosecutors will release them without bail or corrupt judges will let them go free.
+1 Classy reply! And TigersEye’s follow up is perfect. :-)
Exactly!
I don’t understand some people. We have a poster who attacks this presentation relentlessly. He obviously has some understanding, but there are things that don’t add up, so he wants to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I came to the realization some time ago that the case against the Left and many supposedly on the right on this fraud isn’t going to be like a white paper, because they simply won’t allow the physical evidence or facts to be seen.
Rational people cannot look at the body of evidence, affidavits, eyewitnesses, erased files, vans dropping off boxes and so on, all in five key battleground states, and not have the gut feeling there was massive fraud.
I really don’t get some folks who I would have expected otherwise from.
> but there are things that don’t add up, so he
> wants to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I think some people expect that life is like the movies where they can watch in slow-motion and replay every move the villains make, at will.
I fear Americans have watched so much trash entertainment they no longer actually understand how things unfold in real life; they do not understand how to critically evaluate whether or not the witnesses stand to gain from potentially lying, whether or not the evidence is authoritative, whether or not the witnesses are themselves competent and able to evaluate for themselves whether or not what they have seen is objective and true, whether the sources are truly independent or simply echos of one another, whether or not small differences truly matter, whether or not it is realistic to believe that every witness’ memory is 100% fool proof, etc...
But I *ALSO* think there are many leftists who come to this board simply to troll and astroturf; and I do suspect that in this case.
Hm. I appreciate that analysis with the lack of realistic expectations.
And I am sure we do have Leftist trolls on here, some of longstanding, I suspect.
Like almost every other claim from Hoft the grifter, when pressed it crumbles.
In his own words:
...these were highly suspicious and likely illegal ballots...
Suspicious and likely huh? Not ABSOLUTE?
What a con man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.